I agree with both of you. It would be especially helpful if someone would post the first two or three generations to the Cagle web page. This would be the "official" list for newbies like myself and would result in less confusion if someone would maintain it, posting verified information as it is learned. I lack the expertise or I would volunteer to maintain it myself. I have only had a computer about six months and I am afraid I would have it loused up worse than it is now. In fact, I haven't the slightest idea even how you post information to the Cagle web page. Lee Cagle Moore, OK On Thu, 17 Jun 1999 10:24:51 EDT JBCagle@aol.com writes: >David and List, > Thanks for your response David. We Know for sure David is one of >Leonard's sons. The rest in the group are all probabilities. I >wandered in >circles for a long time without any sense of direction and my database >was a >terrible mess. In order to eliminate a lot of confusion I chose to go >with >John G. Cage's suggestions and work accordingly. It was my experience >that >when there was no established order in the first generations, the >later >generations really could get confusing. If new information proves one >of >these men to be otherwise it is an easy task to prune and graft that >particular person to his proper place in the database. Working with >an >established order, even when it is a probable order, makes it much >easier to >keep the train on the tracks. > Jimmy B. Cagle > Long Beach, MS > > >==== CAGLE Mailing List ==== > >Cagle Family Genealogy Forum >http://genforum.familytreemaker.com/cagle/ > ___________________________________________________________________ Get the Internet just the way you want it. Free software, free e-mail, and free Internet access for a month! Try Juno Web: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.