Mary Gene has found a reference to George Bunker and Jane Geoffrey. Since we have never looked at Geoffreys for possible parents of Jane we thought it would be a good idea to put this out on the list and see what anyone else can find. Could Jane have been a Geoffrey instead of a Godfrey? I will do some looking as soon as I get time but it is museum day for me. Two different ones. In the morning I am in the 1880's costume and in the afternoon in the 1780's costume with an effort to stay in those eras as far as my actions and speech is concerned. Should get me totally confused. Even more than I usually am. Bette -----Original Message----- From: Mary-Gene Page [mailto:mgpage@unlimited.net] Sent: Saturday, February 01, 2003 9:58 AM To: Bette Richards Subject: Re: George Bunker and Jane GEOFFREY No, I just had time to send you that list of search results. I won't try Geoffreys unless I have a WHOLE LOT of time. By the way, I absent-mindedly sent the same message to the list, but of course Rootsweb would not send it out because it had an attachment. I do think, however, that carrying on correspondence such as this on the list would encourage participation in discussions. mg Bette Richards wrote: > Now that is interesting. Maybe we should look at Geoffreys. Have you > found anything? I have seen this page at NEHGS and input any data that > we did not have but I did not think about looking for Geoffreys. Bette > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mary-Gene Page [mailto:mgpage@unlimited.net] > Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 5:48 PM > To: Bette Richards; Gil Bunker; BUNKER-L > Subject: George Bunker and Jane GEOFFREY >