Barbara: I apologize. After searching through the foot high stack of things I need to enter in the db, I found the copy of the will and the other documents you sent me a year ago. At that time I looked at them and put them in the stack to enter into the db but it has not gotten there yet. I will try to transcribe the will to be published in the Banner but it is really hard to read. However, it is clear that William names his wife, Elizabeth, his sons Henry, Nathan, Andrew and William and his daughters, Rachel, Mary Ann and Margaret. The estate papers you supplied are full of information and I have been derelict in not getting them transcribed. We really appreciate all your help and again I apologize. We would surely love to have DNA proof. If the descendants of Henry, Nathan, Andrew or William matched Henry's descendants, it would go a long way in placing these New Castle families. Any male descendants born Bunkers of this family that may be interested in the DNA project, please look at our website and click on the surname project for information. http://www.bunkerfamilyassn.org. If the cost is a problem ($99), it is possible a "scholarship" might be provided for either this line or any male Bunker descended from George Bunker of Charleston. Bette ____________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: Barbara Jarvis [mailto:jarvis@cyberpc.com] Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2004 9:44 PM To: BUNKER-L@rootsweb.com Subject: William(mMunks) Bette, Just read your column on the Henry L. Bunker, III - Devonshire Lineage. I noticed that you said the children of William and Elizabeth Munks may be as follows: (no proof) are : Henry, etc. I sent you a copy of William's will that listed the children in it. Or are you talking about having DNA proof? Barbara Jarvis ==== BUNKER Mailing List ==== Post your information and queries. We love it. No BUNKER rock left untouched. Spelling variations ok - we don't "know" the original.