RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [BKM] Bowler & wife - High Wycombe 1835
    2. Peter McNulty
    3. Many thanks Jenny My friend will be very pleased. Great list - one enquiry and not only the exact answer (surname) but a census extract too (thanks again, Paul). -- Best regards, Peter McNulty peter@sparshott.org.uk www.sparshott.org.uk Researching: SPARSHOTT families world-wide (especially Hants) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jenny" <catsandme@cathouse22.fsnet.co.uk> To: "Peter McNulty" <peter@sparshott.org.uk> Sent: Sunday, November 28, 2004 10:25 AM Subject: Re: [BKM] Bowler & wife - High Wycombe 1835 > Hi Peter > > >From High Wycombe transcripts: > > 21-May 1835 William X Bowler otp b & Mary Pusey OTP s > Witnesses: Thomas X Pusey, Hughendon Saray X Pusey Hughendon > > Jenny > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Peter McNulty" <peter@sparshott.org.uk> > To: <BUCKS-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 10:54 PM > Subject: Re: [BKM] Bowler & wife - High Wycombe 1835 > > > > Hi Paul > > > > Thanks for your reply > > > > Looks like the family; I'll check out the Newell name. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Paul Irving" <pauljirving@ntlworld.com> > > To: "Peter McNulty" <peter@sparshott.org.uk> > > Sent: Saturday, November 27, 2004 9:52 PM > > Subject: Re: [BKM] Bowler & wife - High Wycombe 1835 > > > > > > > Might this be her? > > > > > > Mary BOWLER 37 wid b West Wycombe Lacemaker > > > Children - > > > John 15 Chairmaker b Hughenden > > > Sarah 13 Scholar b High Wycombe > > > Ann 10 do do > > > William 8 do do > > > Henry 5 do do > > > Visitor Mary NEWEL 18 Milliner b West Wycombe (maybe a clue?) > > > > > > The Bucks FHS may have transcribed it. Try their website at > > > www.bucksfhs.org.uk. They do look-ups. Or the Bucks Genealogical Soc. at > > > www.bucksgs.org.uk > > > > > > Paul > > > > > > Peter McNulty wrote: > > > > > > >Hi, I'm new to this list for this reason: > > > > > > > >I am helping a friend identify a couple that married in High Wycombe. Of > > course, she didn't note all of the detail (like the church name for example) > > but I wondered if there is a listing of marriage partners/marriage > > banns/Bishop's Transcripts for the period covering 1835?

    11/28/2004 03:57:49