Paul....: >I just realised that you've made a mistake with Zaccheus or Laccheus. > He's not a son, he's listed as a "servant". That's a mis-transcription. The original image clearly shows "son". Mike

No, the original says "Serv". Compare with the word above, which is definitely Son, & you can see the difference. He should be listed above Lewis, if they were both sons. Also compare with other entries, e.g. Alice GILKS, 15 House Servant, lower down the page, or Martha PARSONS, 17, House Servant, half-way down the next page. "Serv" is written exactly the same for the girls as in the entry for Zaccheus. Paul Mike Chaney wrote: > Paul....: > > >> I just realised that you've made a mistake with Zaccheus or Laccheus. >> He's not a son, he's listed as a "servant". >> > > That's a mis-transcription. The original image clearly shows "son". > > Mike > > *************************************** > > BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ > BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ > Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >