Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 3540/10000
    1. Re: [BKM] BUCKS Digest, Vol 2, Issue 204
    2. > Hi Brenda, > I have a marriage of James Goodman To Mary Sear in Bletchley on the > 20th may 1839 (I know this would make James only 14 at the time but > the dates might not be right) Regards Martin sear It would be very unlikely indeed, though technically possible.Marriage in the mid twenties is much more likely, when he could afford to support a wife. However, in assessing the age, are you working from a baptism? Remember that the child may very well not have been an infant at the time. Also, James Goodman is not an uncommon name in Bucks (or anyhere), and you may have picked the wrong one. What age does James claim in subsequent different censuses? -Though even that may not be a certain test, because people were pretty vague about ages. I have a man who was definitely born and baptised on given dates in 1800. In 1851, he is 50, in 1861 he is 64, in 1871 76 and when he dies 4 years later, he is back to 75. I suspect we have two different men here. (I've deleted the rest of the message, so am not sure what it said).

    08/23/2007 11:43:22
    1. Re: [BKM] BUCKS Digest, Vol 2, Issue 204
    2. > Hi Brenda, > I have a marriage of James Goodman To Mary Sear in Bletchley on the > 20th may 1839 (I know this would make James only 14 at the time but > the dates might not be right) Regards Martin sear It would be very unlikely indeed, though technically possible.Marriage in the mid twenties is much more likely, when he could afford to support a wife. However, in assessing the age, are you working from a baptism? Remember that the child may very well not have been an infant at the time. Also, James Goodman is not an uncommon name in Bucks (or anyhere), and you may have picked the wrong one. What age does James claim in subsequent different censuses? -Though even that may not be a certain test, because people were pretty vague about ages. I have a man who was definitely born and baptised on given dates in 1800. In 1851, he is 50, in 1861 he is 64, in 1871 76 and when he dies 4 years later, he is back to 75. I suspect we have two different men here. (I've deleted the rest of the message, so am not sure what it said).

    08/23/2007 11:34:33
    1. Re: [BKM] SAXBYs of Dadford, Stowe
    2. Vera Hunt
    3. Hello Eve, Thank you very much for your suggestions to locate their cottage. As they were estate workers for the Dukes of Buckingham, it seems that maps which, hopefully, show the names of tenants will prove to be the most useful, as so many records have gone to the USA. Your info. re: closing day at CBS is also very helpful. Regards, Vera. ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, August 21, 2007 8:17 AM Subject: Re: [BKM] BUCKS Digest, Vol 2, Issue 204 > > > > Would it still be possible for me to identify the cottage in Dadford > > in which they lived? (They appear there in every census from > > 1841-1901). > > What you will need to do is to study the various censuses closely, and try to pinpoint > the cottage as against some landmark like a pub, school or chapel. Then you can > locate this (even if it has changed use, the form of the building is likely to be > recognisable, and it may even be called 'The Old School' or 'The old > Plough/Lion/Swan'. If Yours was two doors away, you look for houses of the right > vintage and then ask the owners (very aplogetically, since some folk resent > unannounced visitors, while others welcome them. The present inhabitants just > might have studied their deeds. > If you know the family was there in 1910, it is easier - all houses were revalued > then, and there is a map keyed to the name of the current owners/tenants in CBS. > There may also be a tithe map for approx 1840, which would name owners and > sometimes, not always, tenants. It is worth checking this in advance, since it you > want to use maps, you need to book a space on the map table. Some of these maps > are as big as table cloths, hence the need to book. The archivist has a list of local > maps they hold and would be able to check if such a tithe map exists (if notm they > do have them at Kew, but this is less convenient). > Similarly, there may be an Enclosure map, which normally would also give owners > and at least some tenants. I cannot find a date for any enclosure of Dadford. The > hamlet grew up when the common people were effectively trurned out of the former > Stowe village, to improve the views from the mansion. > The problem with the Stowe estate (in which Dadford lies) is that it was owned by > the Marquess/Dukes of Buckingham, who went bust later in the century. Almost all > their useful historical papers were bought by an American, Henry Huntington, and > they are kept in his Museum in California, displayed in which cabinets as if they > were ancient pottery, not to be touched, and the curators make great difficulties for > anyone wishing to do research on them. > I have some material relating to the Saxbys, and will check to see if there is any > earlier work on locatinmg the exact place. The problem is that research over here > was done by a less than expert person, si it is unlikely to be thorough. > By the way - CBS is always closed on Mondays, which is a pain to anyone wishing > to get a good start to the week. > > Many thanks for any suggestions, Vera (Melbourne, 0z) > > > > ------------------------------ > > > > To contact the BUCKS list administrator, send an email to > > [email protected] > > > > To post a message to the BUCKS mailing list, send an email to > > [email protected] > > > > __________________________________________________________ > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > [email protected] with the word "unsubscribe" without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the email with no additional > > text. > > > > > > End of BUCKS Digest, Vol 2, Issue 204 > > ************************************* > > > > > > -- > > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 - Release Date: > > 25/07/2007 01:16 > > > > > *************************************** > > BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ > BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ > Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    08/23/2007 08:20:43
    1. Re: [BKM] Butler in Wycombe
    2. SHEILA REYNOLDS
    3. Hi Amanda. My interest is in William wife Ann nee Harsant, I have done a little research into the family. And ALL there Children were given the middle name of HARSANT. I have not come across a Louis as yet, There eldest Daughter Fanny Harsant Butler was born in 1844 in Wootten Underage Gls, so may be Louis is a relative of William's. Sheila Dear Listers, I haven't posted anything to the list for quite a while, but have a problem that I wish to ask for help with. My GGG Grandad was Louis Butler, born in Blockley, Worcestershire in abt 1845. He appears on the 1881 census as living with his family in 60, Easton Street, Wycombe. Louis' daughter Elizabeth Louise was my GG Grandmother. My grandad, before he died, told me that William Butler, the editor of the Bucks Free Press, was also an ancestor of mine. But I can't find a connection between Louis Butler & William Butler. Can anyone help please? I have found out that William Butler set up the BFP in 1856, died in 1885 & had a son Thomas Harsant Butler in Wycombe in the Dec qtr of 1851 (who succeeded his father as editor). Could it be that Louis & Thomas were brothers or cousins perhaps? Thank you for any help you can give. Amanda *************************************** BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    08/23/2007 03:32:35
    1. [BKM] Butler in Wycombe
    2. Amanda Gostelow
    3. Dear Listers, I haven't posted anything to the list for quite a while, but have a problem that I wish to ask for help with. My GGG Grandad was Louis Butler, born in Blockley, Worcestershire in abt 1845. He appears on the 1881 census as living with his family in 60, Easton Street, Wycombe. Louis' daughter Elizabeth Louise was my GG Grandmother. My grandad, before he died, told me that William Butler, the editor of the Bucks Free Press, was also an ancestor of mine. But I can't find a connection between Louis Butler & William Butler. Can anyone help please? I have found out that William Butler set up the BFP in 1856, died in 1885 & had a son Thomas Harsant Butler in Wycombe in the Dec qtr of 1851 (who succeeded his father as editor). Could it be that Louis & Thomas were brothers or cousins perhaps? Thank you for any help you can give. Amanda

    08/22/2007 07:47:48
    1. [BKM] William WALL's marriage found
    2. Andrea Franks
    3. For those of you looking for Sarah WALL (of Waddesdon) parents marriage. William WALL (of Grendon Underwood cordwiner) m 27.10.1723 (Ludgershall) Elizabeth HUDSON (of Waddesdon) by Lic. If you already have this information disregard, oh yes please check the day and month those two where not very clear. Andrea No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.484 / Virus Database: 269.12.1/965 - Release Date: 2007/08/21 04:02 PM

    08/22/2007 08:09:17
    1. Re: [BKM] BUCKS Digest, Vol 2, Issue 204
    2. > > Would it still be possible for me to identify the cottage in Dadford > in which they lived? (They appear there in every census from > 1841-1901). What you will need to do is to study the various censuses closely, and try to pinpoint the cottage as against some landmark like a pub, school or chapel. Then you can locate this (even if it has changed use, the form of the building is likely to be recognisable, and it may even be called 'The Old School' or 'The old Plough/Lion/Swan'. If Yours was two doors away, you look for houses of the right vintage and then ask the owners (very aplogetically, since some folk resent unannounced visitors, while others welcome them. The present inhabitants just might have studied their deeds. If you know the family was there in 1910, it is easier - all houses were revalued then, and there is a map keyed to the name of the current owners/tenants in CBS. There may also be a tithe map for approx 1840, which would name owners and sometimes, not always, tenants. It is worth checking this in advance, since it you want to use maps, you need to book a space on the map table. Some of these maps are as big as table cloths, hence the need to book. The archivist has a list of local maps they hold and would be able to check if such a tithe map exists (if notm they do have them at Kew, but this is less convenient). Similarly, there may be an Enclosure map, which normally would also give owners and at least some tenants. I cannot find a date for any enclosure of Dadford. The hamlet grew up when the common people were effectively trurned out of the former Stowe village, to improve the views from the mansion. The problem with the Stowe estate (in which Dadford lies) is that it was owned by the Marquess/Dukes of Buckingham, who went bust later in the century. Almost all their useful historical papers were bought by an American, Henry Huntington, and they are kept in his Museum in California, displayed in which cabinets as if they were ancient pottery, not to be touched, and the curators make great difficulties for anyone wishing to do research on them. I have some material relating to the Saxbys, and will check to see if there is any earlier work on locatinmg the exact place. The problem is that research over here was done by a less than expert person, si it is unlikely to be thorough. By the way - CBS is always closed on Mondays, which is a pain to anyone wishing to get a good start to the week. > Many thanks for any suggestions, Vera (Melbourne, 0z) > > ------------------------------ > > To contact the BUCKS list administrator, send an email to > [email protected] > > To post a message to the BUCKS mailing list, send an email to > [email protected] > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > BUCKS-request[email protected] with the word "unsubscribe" without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the email with no additional > text. > > > End of BUCKS Digest, Vol 2, Issue 204 > ************************************* > > > -- > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 - Release Date: > 25/07/2007 01:16 >

    08/20/2007 05:17:20
    1. Re: [BKM] BUCKS Digest, Vol 2, Issue 204
    2. > > Would it still be possible for me to identify the cottage in Dadford > in which they lived? (They appear there in every census from > 1841-1901). What you will need to do is to study the various censuses closely, and try to pinpoint the cottage as against some landmark like a pub, school or chapel. Then you can locate this (even if it has changed use, the form of the building is likely to be recognisable, and it may even be called 'The Old School' or 'The old Plough/Lion/Swan'. If Yours was two doors away, you look for houses of the right vintage and then ask the owners (very aplogetically, since some folk resent unannounced visitors, while others welcome them. The present inhabitants just might have studied their deeds. If you know the family was there in 1910, it is easier - all houses were revalued then, and there is a map keyed to the name of the current owners/tenants in CBS. There may also be a tithe map for approx 1840, which would name owners and sometimes, not always, tenants. It is worth checking this in advance, since it you want to use maps, you need to book a space on the map table. Some of these maps are as big as table cloths, hence the need to book. The archivist has a list of local maps they hold and would be able to check if such a tithe map exists (if notm they do have them at Kew, but this is less convenient). Similarly, there may be an Enclosure map, which normally would also give owners and at least some tenants. I cannot find a date for any enclosure of Dadford. The hamlet grew up when the common people were effectively trurned out of the former Stowe village, to improve the views from the mansion. The problem with the Stowe estate (in which Dadford lies) is that it was owned by the Marquess/Dukes of Buckingham, who went bust later in the century. Almost all their useful historical papers were bought by an American, Henry Huntington, and they are kept in his Museum in California, displayed in which cabinets as if they were ancient pottery, not to be touched, and the curators make great difficulties for anyone wishing to do research on them. I have some material relating to the Saxbys, and will check to see if there is any earlier work on locatinmg the exact place. The problem is that research over here was done by a less than expert person, si it is unlikely to be thorough. By the way - CBS is always closed on Mondays, which is a pain to anyone wishing to get a good start to the week. > Many thanks for any suggestions, Vera (Melbourne, 0z) > > ------------------------------ > > To contact the BUCKS list administrator, send an email to > [email protected] > > To post a message to the BUCKS mailing list, send an email to > [email protected] > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word "unsubscribe" without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the email with no additional > text. > > > End of BUCKS Digest, Vol 2, Issue 204 > ************************************* > > > -- > Internal Virus Database is out-of-date. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.19/917 - Release Date: > 25/07/2007 01:16 >

    08/20/2007 05:16:43
    1. [BKM] Visit to Centre for Bucks. Studies
    2. Vera Hunt
    3. Hello Listers, I will be visiting the U.K. in 0ctober and would like to do some research into my SAXBY family from Dadford, Stowe at the Centre for Bucks. Studies, Aylesbury. Could anyone recommend some accommodation (perhaps a B&B) nearby that is reasonably priced and comfortable, please. Would it still be possible for me to identify the cottage in Dadford in which they lived? (They appear there in every census from 1841-1901). Many thanks for any suggestions, Vera (Melbourne, 0z)

    08/20/2007 09:14:16
    1. Re: [BKM] Goodman
    2. martin sear
    3. Hi Brenda, I have a marriage of James Goodman To Mary Sear in Bletchley on the 20th may 1839 (I know this would make James only 14 at the time but the dates might not be right) Regards Martin sear -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Brenda Grainger Sent: 18 August 2007 20:56 To: [email protected] Subject: [BKM] Goodman Any information on the family of James Goodman - born 1825 in Waterheaton would be very much appreciated. Brenda *************************************** BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    08/19/2007 04:59:59
    1. [BKM] Goodman
    2. Brenda Grainger
    3. Any information on the family of James Goodman - born 1825 in Waterheaton would be very much appreciated. Brenda

    08/18/2007 02:55:47
    1. Re: [BKM] John SAUNDERS
    2. Andrea Franks
    3. Hi Peter, Yes I have, there is a few Jane Saunders one for Aylesbury and one for somewhere else in and around Aylesbury unfortunately there is no age given on the index for that era, if memory serves me correct they started putting the age on just after the last Jane's death for her area, and of cause John death was to early, so if I had won the 35m pounds I would have a fields day, just kidding, I am thinking of applying for two of the most likely certificates, but just thought if someone had the answer if would save time and money, but thanks all the same Peter. Regards Andrea -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Peter Freshwater Sent: 18 August 2007 07:59 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BKM] John SAUNDERS Hi Andrea Have you tried Free BMD http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/ for the quarters / dates of John's and Jane's deaths? You would still have to send for the certificates for the exact dates, but you should find the references there. Hope this helps, Peter Peter B Freshwater MA MCLIP FSAScot Edinburgh, Scotland [email protected] Researching BRUCE, FOLWELL, FOX, FRESHWATER, PERKINS, SWINGLER (Beds, Leics, Northants) THOMPSON (Bucks) HAUGHAN, JOHNSTONE, RICHARDSON (Annandale, Cumberland, Durham) DOW, FINDLAY, GRAY, JACK(SON), KENNEDY (Angus, Glasgow, Perth) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrea Franks" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 2:27 PM Subject: [BKM] John SAUNDERS > Dear All, > > > > Can someone please help me with the look up of the burial of John SAUNDERS > after 1812 and his wife Jane after 1841 in Chearsley. In the 1841 census > Jane's age is given as 65y. > > > > Andrea > > *************************************** > > BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ > BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ > Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message *************************************** BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    08/18/2007 10:58:09
    1. Re: [BKM] John SAUNDERS
    2. Peter Freshwater
    3. Hi Andrea Have you tried Free BMD http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/ for the quarters / dates of John's and Jane's deaths? You would still have to send for the certificates for the exact dates, but you should find the references there. Hope this helps, Peter Peter B Freshwater MA MCLIP FSAScot Edinburgh, Scotland [email protected] Researching BRUCE, FOLWELL, FOX, FRESHWATER, PERKINS, SWINGLER (Beds, Leics, Northants) THOMPSON (Bucks) HAUGHAN, JOHNSTONE, RICHARDSON (Annandale, Cumberland, Durham) DOW, FINDLAY, GRAY, JACK(SON), KENNEDY (Angus, Glasgow, Perth) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Andrea Franks" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 2:27 PM Subject: [BKM] John SAUNDERS > Dear All, > > > > Can someone please help me with the look up of the burial of John SAUNDERS > after 1812 and his wife Jane after 1841 in Chearsley. In the 1841 census > Jane's age is given as 65y. > > > > Andrea > > *************************************** > > BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ > BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ > Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    08/18/2007 12:58:36
    1. [BKM] John SAUNDERS
    2. Andrea Franks
    3. Dear All, Can someone please help me with the look up of the burial of John SAUNDERS after 1812 and his wife Jane after 1841 in Chearsley. In the 1841 census Jane's age is given as 65y. Andrea

    08/17/2007 09:27:53
    1. Re: [BKM] Certificate Exchange (was William and Elizabeth MITCHELL)
    2. The Quineys
    3. Just googled for "Certificate Exchange" and there are several sites providing space to 'advertise' unwanted BMD certificates. I have no experience of any of them (maybe others do and can share with us?!) but you might reach a wider audience if there are no takers from this list. Just a thought Heather Q Art and Jeune Mitchell wrote: > I have received a death certificate for Elizabeth MITCHELL wife of William MITCHELL Elizabeth, born 1850 Windsor But big dissapointment it was the wrong one. and husband turned out to be a Alfred MITCHELL. > Should there be any interest out there, My lose could be your gain. With no cost it can be yours. > > Jeune Witney Oxon.

    08/17/2007 02:12:22
    1. [BKM] Oh Dear.
    2. Art and Jeune Mitchell
    3. There was a problem I was told that the message, the first could not go .. I there- for set about another . It does seem in the end that two was one too many. Jeune Witney Oxon

    08/16/2007 06:34:56
    1. [BKM] William and Elizabeth MITCHELL
    2. Art and Jeune Mitchell
    3. I have received a death certificate for Elizabeth MITCHELL wife of William MITCHELL Elizabeth, born 1850 Windsor But big dissapointment it was the wrong one. and husband turned out to be a Alfred MITCHELL. Should there be any interest out there, My lose could be your gain. With no cost it can be yours. District is Eton Any idea's about my Elizabeth. ? 1901 Census. Wexham St. No 5. Hardings Cottage William Head, was 46 yrs Elizabeth Wife 51yrs Then two sons and Elizabeth's father This is R G 13/1344. Then I have William. This a death, born abt 1855 year 1908 3rd Q, 53 yrs. District Eton. BKM. 3a Just do not wish to be dissapointed again. Regarding another certificate. Jeune Witney Oxon.

    08/16/2007 05:51:58
    1. [BKM] Elizabeth & William MITCHELL
    2. Art and Jeune Mitchell
    3. I am returning after spending a very nice time out with visitors. I am desperate, This is with Ref: to Elizabeth MITCHELL Stoke Poges . ( District Eton. ) Elizabeth 1901 census married to William MITCHELL, Elizabeth was age 51. William MITCHELL age 46 I had been looking for a death for Elizabeth Thinking that I had found the right one I sent for a death certificate. The Elizabeth in question was born 1850 When the post arrived it was a dissapointment. Giving right dates, all round but sadly wrong Elizabeth. The husband was a Alfred MITCHELL If anyone has any interest , regarding the Alfred MITCHELL and wrong Elizabeth , I am willing to share with you, at know cost. to yourself., (Any idea's please. ) For mine. . I hope this death is right . This being William MITCHELL,born abt 1855 Death 1908 ( 3rd Q) age 53 yrs. District Eton Bucks, Volume 3a page 382 Jeune Witney Oxon.

    08/16/2007 05:22:55
    1. Re: [BKM] Anthony HOLT GOODYER
    2. Celia Renshaw
    3. Hi, I have the PRs of Thornborough (Bucks FHS transcript) and there are plenty of the following: GOODIER GOODGAR GOODGER GOODJAR GOODYEAR GOODYEARE GOODYER Also many HOLTs There are so many it could be worth buying the PRs on CD from Bucks FHS : http://bucksfhs.org.uk/shop/index.php?option=com_virtuemart&page=shop.browse &category_id=6&keyword=&manufacturer_id=0&Itemid=2&orderby=product_name&limi t=30&limitstart=90 Cheers Celia Renshaw in Chesterfield UK -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Anthony Holt Sent: 14 August 2007 20:07 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BKM] Anthony HOLT GOODYER Dear Yvonne, I suggest you consult the following website:- http://wc.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=SHOW&db=hrohrer&recno=3964 You will find a Thomas GOODYER there born in thornborough 23rd April 1758, married Mary Illing. There is quite a pedigree given for Mary Illing. Thomas Goodyer was the sister of Mary Goodyer who became the wife of John Holt. Your Mary Goodyer was obviously her niece, but the website has not been told about any children of Thomas Goodyer. Anthony Holt On Aug 13, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Withington Family wrote: > I am researching the GOODIER/GOODGER/GOODYER etc family of > Thornborough & would appreciate any input anyone may have . > > I have a Mary born about 1780 with children born between 1802 & > 1821, but don't have a spouse for her.Parents are Thomas & Mary > (surname > unknown) > > I also have an Ethel Ada PARRETT b 1885 if she is of any interest. > > Yvonne

    08/14/2007 02:58:12
    1. Re: [BKM] Anthony HOLT GOODYER
    2. Anthony Holt
    3. Dear Yvonne, I suggest you consult the following website:- http://wc.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=SHOW&db=hrohrer&recno=3964 You will find a Thomas GOODYER there born in thornborough 23rd April 1758, married Mary Illing. There is quite a pedigree given for Mary Illing. Thomas Goodyer was the sister of Mary Goodyer who became the wife of John Holt. Your Mary Goodyer was obviously her niece, but the website has not been told about any children of Thomas Goodyer. Anthony Holt On Aug 13, 2007, at 2:08 PM, Withington Family wrote: > I am researching the GOODIER/GOODGER/GOODYER etc family of > Thornborough & > would appreciate any input anyone may have . > > I have a Mary born about 1780 with children born between 1802 & > 1821, but > don't have a spouse for her.Parents are Thomas & Mary (surname > unknown) > > I also have an Ethel Ada PARRETT b 1885 if she is of any interest. > > Yvonne > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Constanley" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, August 13, 2007 5:29 AM > Subject: Re: [BKM] Anthony HOLT OSBOURNE & PARROTT > > >> From: [email protected] [mailto:bucks- >> [email protected]]On >> Behalf Of Anthony Holt >> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2007 4:48 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Anthony HOLT OSBOURNE & PARROTT >> >> >> This was an interesting email. If you look at the one-place study of >> Grendon Underwood:- >> http://wc.rootsweb.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=SHOW&db=hrohrer&recno=3964 >> and select H and then Holt, you'll find Pearce Holt marrying Ellen >> Hews in 1594. It also gives Ellen's date of birth as 11 Dec 1574. >> My father was Archibald Joseph Holt, and i am 11 generations down >> from Pearce/Ellen if the information on that site is correct. >> You clearly have information to add to the site, although it appears >> to contradict the statement that Thomas Hews married Margaret Field. >> best regards, >> Anthony Holt >> >> Hello Anthony, >> I have looked at it, and found several differences to what I have, >> First >> I have Ellen PARRET/PARRATT dau of Andrew PARRETT & Elizabeth >> OSBORNE as >> the >> wife Of Pearce HOLT. With the same children as is given to Ellen >> Hews. >> I belong to the P*RR*TT Society They accept my Ellen as do several >> other >> members as their ancestor. >> I have been checking on the Hews in Edgcott The only Ellen I >> found was >> Harry Hews chr 17 Oct 1574 >> Ellen Hews chr 11 Dec 1565 the aforesayed Ellen Hews bur 13 Apr >> 1566 >> both born before >> Thomas Hews & Margaret Feelde married 17 Nov 1575 at Edgcott >> although >> Harry & Ellen had the parents of Thomas Hews & Margaret >> Bridget chr 1 Mar 1576 >> John chr 4 Mar 1578 >> Richard chr 2 Feb 1853/4 bur 26 Mar 1584 >> Elizabeth chr 9 Apr 1585 bur 12 Apr 1585 >> William chr 10 Apr 1586 >> >> Thomas was bur 1596 Margaret bur 2 Dec 1599 >> >> There was another Harry Hewes chr 9 Apr 1544 but it gave no >> parent's name >> >> So unless some one can come up with more proof I will keep Ellen >> Parret as >> my ancestor >> >> >> I checked the ROADS Family for your line and indeed we are >> related, >> our >> common ancestors are Perce & Ellen Parrat >> the first Holt in my family was Amy Holt who married Benjamin >> Hatwell 4 >> Sep >> 1786 >> I saw a few differences or additions >> For Ann Boughton I had Bowden Ann Holt b 15 Nov 1761 m >> Edmund EDWIN >> 5 >> Jan 1785 >> John Holt b 12 Nov 1762 d 1762 >> John Holt b 17 Feb 1765 d 25 Nov 1844 >> Mary Goodyer I have Goodier I did not have her parents >> Nor did I have Anne Holt b 31 Mar 1795 their daughter >> William Holt b 12 Apr 1829 m Maria Rolfe b 17 Aug 1833 Chelsea, >> London >> >> I don't think I have anything of Thomas Andrew Holt & Elizabeth >> Grace and >> their family >> I have not checked any more yet. >> >> >> Best regards >> Constance >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *************************************** >> >> BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ >> BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ >> Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message > > *************************************** > > BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ > BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ > Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to BUCKS- > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >

    08/14/2007 02:07:22