Sorry folk. It's Mr & Mrs EAST, not <<Best>>. All fingers & thumbs tonight. Joan.

How old was Mary Ann when she died? Joan wrote: > Hello. Does Emma Jane EAST mean anything to anyone on the list, please? She was residing at 1 Park Street, High Wycombe in 1898 and was the daughter, and informant, of death of Mary Ann HUDSON who was buried in Wycombe. I could assume that Emma's father was James HUDSON, but hesitate to go off in that direction in case it's another blind alley. > > >From freebmd I have found a birth ref June qtr 1869 ref 1d 542 Camberwell, for an Emma Jane HUDSON. (I don't yet have the father's name.) There are plenty of other HUDSON births recorded in Wycombe District, but not in that precise location, within the next 10yrs. I also have HUDSON families in Camberwell who are "mine", but no James. > > I found a marriage on freebmd that might fit - Dec qtr 1883 ref Wycombe 3a 910, but no subsequent births to BEST. That might mean Emma went back to "home ground" to wed. If I could establish that there are no other EAST families in Wycombe in 1883 and 1898, I could assume she was a dutiful daughter, just visiting. A look-up in 1891C for Wycombe, for Mr and Mrs BEST or other guidance, gratefully received.TIA. Joan. > > NB I did notice that in the "deaths" list in freebmd.org, on and from Dec 1866, the ages are recorded. A bonus. > > *************************************** > > BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ > BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ > Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to BUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >

Hello. Does Emma Jane EAST mean anything to anyone on the list, please? She was residing at 1 Park Street, High Wycombe in 1898 and was the daughter, and informant, of death of Mary Ann HUDSON who was buried in Wycombe. I could assume that Emma's father was James HUDSON, but hesitate to go off in that direction in case it's another blind alley. >From freebmd I have found a birth ref June qtr 1869 ref 1d 542 Camberwell, for an Emma Jane HUDSON. (I don't yet have the father's name.) There are plenty of other HUDSON births recorded in Wycombe District, but not in that precise location, within the next 10yrs. I also have HUDSON families in Camberwell who are "mine", but no James. I found a marriage on freebmd that might fit - Dec qtr 1883 ref Wycombe 3a 910, but no subsequent births to BEST. That might mean Emma went back to "home ground" to wed. If I could establish that there are no other EAST families in Wycombe in 1883 and 1898, I could assume she was a dutiful daughter, just visiting. A look-up in 1891C for Wycombe, for Mr and Mrs BEST or other guidance, gratefully received.TIA. Joan. NB I did notice that in the "deaths" list in freebmd.org, on and from Dec 1866, the ages are recorded. A bonus.

Hello Marian. Many thanks for this. I think it reasonable that widow Mary would have stayed in the Wycombe area, especially if Louisa had married and had children, so I'll claim her until I'm proved wrong - again! Don't know who Philip Strange was. Not extended family. Another VKS, Eve, found a different death entry for a Mary HUDSON but this was pre-1901; and there doesn't seem to be any more for that name. I still don't know where James HUDSON fits in, but I shall keep Digging! Gt granny must have been laid to rest somewhere. I thank all again for help. Joan. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marian Barton" <marian.r.barton@rogers.com> To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 3:23 PM Subject: Re: [BKM] James HUDSON papermaker Wycombe > Could this be your Mary Hudson in 1901 census > Richardson St, High Wycombe > Home of Philip Strange > HUDSON Mary age 64 widow boarder > > Looks like Louisa married John Saunders. In 1901 census has three > children - John 6, Louisa 4 and William 2 >

Could this be your Mary Hudson in 1901 census Richardson St, High Wycombe Home of Philip Strange HUDSON Mary age 64 widow boarder Looks like Louisa married John Saunders. In 1901 census has three children - John 6, Louisa 4 and William 2 Marian ----- Original Message ----- From: <bucks-request@rootsweb.com> To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, March 06, 2009 3:03 AM Subject: BUCKS Digest, Vol 4, Issue 41 > > > The default format for the Digest is Plain text. If you prefer to receive > your Digest in MIME format, please contact the list administrator. > > ************************************** > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY (J. Nixey) > 2. Re: 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY (J. Nixey) > 3. James HUDSON papermaker WYCOMBE (Joan) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:40:11 -0000 > From: "J. Nixey" <jons.family.tree@btinternet.com> > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > To: "\"baldrick\"" <baldricktheturnip@inspiralmail.com>, > <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <DE6EAD38CDC94819BE5CE78EFCBAD88C@jon577b3d5f2a9> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: ""baldrick"" <baldricktheturnip@inspiralmail.com> > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 1:24 PM > Subject: Re: [BKM]1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > > >> An 83 yr old David NIX died at Watford Reg District in 1900; perhaps this >> is an >> abbreviated NIXEY? > > Hi, I know his wife, Jane, died in 1899 in the Windsor RD but so far I've > not found a definite sighting of David's death index. If this is him, I'm > not really sure at the moment why he would have been in the Watford area, > but it's certainly something to chase up, thanks! > > Kindest regards, Jon > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:56:47 -0000 > From: "J. Nixey" <jons.family.tree@btinternet.com> > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <CDEA094B48894BEC801BC2515977F587@jon577b3d5f2a9> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Just found the death index for David NIXEY on FreeBMD: > > Death Jul-Sep 1896 > Nixet David 79 Eton 3a 389 > > Cheers, Jon > > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 23:28:48 -0000 > From: "Joan" <jmmj75@talktalk.net> > Subject: [BKM] James HUDSON papermaker WYCOMBE > To: "BUCKS List" <BUCKS@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <00ec01c99dea$54d47e50$0201a8c0@home> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" > > Hello List. The death cert duly arrd for the widow, Mary Ann HUDSON, about > whom I'd been asking so many questions. She died in Wycombe Regn District > , sub-district of Wycombe 10 Aug 1898, age 71. The GRO ref 03a 484. And > no, she wasn't the widow of Alfred or John HUDSON, as I hoped, but James. > I don't have a "James HUDSON" in my tree. (I had noted the large > discrepancy at the recorded age at death.) Can anyone add information for > James, please? > > But what happened to Mary HUDSON (nee STONE) after 1891C, at which time > she was in Crendon Street, age 54, with husband, Alfred, and 2 children? I > couldn't find her in the 1901C in Wycombe - so had assumed she was the > lady buried in 1898. > > The only new lead I might have is that her daughter Louisa Helena > Elizabeth V HUDSON married in Wycombe in March qtr 1890. I don't know the > spouse' name, but it's just possible Mary might have been living with them > in 1901C. Anyone got a spare ladder for this "brick wall"? BG. Thanks for > your contd interest. Joan. > > ------------------------------ > > To contact the BUCKS list administrator, send an email to > BUCKS-admin@rootsweb.com. > > To post a message to the BUCKS mailing list, send an email to > BUCKS@rootsweb.com. > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > BUCKS-request@rootsweb.com > with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body > of the > email with no additional text. > > > End of BUCKS Digest, Vol 4, Issue 41 > ************************************ >

I am researching Miss Ada Chevalier who was born in Kensington about 1866. Later with her brother Bertram they came to live in Chesham by 1911. By 1915 they had moved to Chesham Bois, and Ada seems to have become Mrs Ada Newton, wife of Mr William Bermingham Newton of Chesham Bois. Anyone know anything about these folk? I am researching them for a local history project. Neil Rees Chesham, Bucks

Hello List. The death cert duly arrd for the widow, Mary Ann HUDSON, about whom I'd been asking so many questions. She died in Wycombe Regn District , sub-district of Wycombe 10 Aug 1898, age 71. The GRO ref 03a 484. And no, she wasn't the widow of Alfred or John HUDSON, as I hoped, but James. I don't have a "James HUDSON" in my tree. (I had noted the large discrepancy at the recorded age at death.) Can anyone add information for James, please? But what happened to Mary HUDSON (nee STONE) after 1891C, at which time she was in Crendon Street, age 54, with husband, Alfred, and 2 children? I couldn't find her in the 1901C in Wycombe - so had assumed she was the lady buried in 1898. The only new lead I might have is that her daughter Louisa Helena Elizabeth V HUDSON married in Wycombe in March qtr 1890. I don't know the spouse' name, but it's just possible Mary might have been living with them in 1901C. Anyone got a spare ladder for this "brick wall"? BG. Thanks for your contd interest. Joan.

Just found the death index for David NIXEY on FreeBMD: Death Jul-Sep 1896 Nixet David 79 Eton 3a 389 Cheers, Jon

----- Original Message ----- From: ""baldrick"" <baldricktheturnip@inspiralmail.com> To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 1:24 PM Subject: Re: [BKM]1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > An 83 yr old David NIX died at Watford Reg District in 1900; perhaps this > is an > abbreviated NIXEY? Hi, I know his wife, Jane, died in 1899 in the Windsor RD but so far I've not found a definite sighting of David's death index. If this is him, I'm not really sure at the moment why he would have been in the Watford area, but it's certainly something to chase up, thanks! Kindest regards, Jon

Take care to look at alternative spellings too; there is a James DIXAY birth listed in 1844 on FreeBMD as follows:- Births Sep 1844 Nixay James Thame 16 100 but as the date/place is out I expect this is a different family. What look like David's parents, James & Mary, can be found on the 1841 census but I guess you know this? An 83 yr old David NIX died at Watford Reg District in 1900; perhaps this is an abbreviated NIXEY? on 3/3/09 9:58 PM, bucks@rootsweb.com wrote: > > > The default format for the Digest is Plain text. If you prefer to receive your > Digest in MIME format, please contact the list administrator. > > ************************************** > > Today's Topics: > > 1. 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY (J. Nixey) > 2. Re: 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > (Nivard Ovington) > 3. Re: 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY (J. Nixey) > 4. Re: 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > (Nivard Ovington) > 5. Re: 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY (J. Nixey) > 6. Re: 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > (Martin Samson) > 7. Re: 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > (Martin Samson) > 8. Re: 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY (J. Nixey) > 9. Re: 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > (Martin Samson) > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:01:33 -0000 > From: "J. Nixey" <jons.family.tree@btinternet.com> > Subject: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <6ECE43A23C2D4FCFBB7454E415EDC38B@jon577b3d5f2a9> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > Hi everyone, > > I've tried ancestry and findmypast but have failed to find David NIXEY born > about 1818 at Upton c. Chalvey, with his wife Jane, and son James Henry who was > bapt at UcC Nov 10, 1839. > > I know none of the censuses are %100 complete. I was wondering, would someone > who had access to this census on different websites to ancestry and findmypast > or who had the Bucks 1841 index would be so kind as to have a peek to see if > they show up at all please? > > Very many thanks to anyone who can help. Kind regards to all, > > Jon > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:59:15 -0000 > From: "Nivard Ovington" <ovington1@sky.com> > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <011001c99c08$3e0bc540$0200a8c0@NJOvington> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Hi Jon > > I have had a virtual wander around those areas under Upton cum Chalvey in > 1841 but found no obvious David NIXEY > > I did find several other NIXEYs but am sure you have those as they are quite > clear, there were a few pages with entries so feint that you could not read > them at all, perhaps David is on one of those > > I even took in the workhouse just in case but nothing there, interesting > that the person that filled in the workhouse forms took the trouble of > noting the Parishes to which the inmates belonged, a nice clear hand too > > He should be around as you know as his son was born there in 1839 but later > he is in Langley, I checked the index for Langley in 1841 but nothing > obvious leaps out > > Be interested to see if he does turn up in another index > > Best wishes Nivard Ovington, in Cornwall (UK) > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I've tried ancestry and findmypast but have failed to find David NIXEY >> born about 1818 at Upton c. Chalvey, with his wife Jane, and son James >> Henry who was bapt at UcC Nov 10, 1839. >> >> I know none of the censuses are %100 complete. I was wondering, would >> someone who had access to this census on different websites to ancestry >> and findmypast or who had the Bucks 1841 index would be so kind as to have >> a peek to see if they show up at all please? >> >> Very many thanks to anyone who can help. Kind regards to all, >> >> Jon > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:50:31 -0000 > From: "J. Nixey" <jons.family.tree@btinternet.com> > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <EE40EFBB8FA242F2909AFCCCC526BE00@jon577b3d5f2a9> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Hi Nivard, > > Thank you so much for your time and effort, I guess it's going to be one of > those occasions where there is a gap in the data. Such a shame, but we're > very fortunate to have as much of the censuses as we do, aren't we? > > Thanks once again, best wishes, > > Jon > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 4 > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 16:55:26 -0000 > From: "Nivard Ovington" <ovington1@sky.com> > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <022e01c99c20$dad0e6e0$0200a8c0@NJOvington> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Hi Jon > > You are most welcome > > I take it there was no residence mention on the baptism? > > I do not see a birth registration so that wouldn't help either > > Mind you its still a long time between the birth and the 1841 so it may not > help anyway > > You never know he may turn up one day > > Best wishes Nivard Ovington, in Cornwall (UK) > >> Hi Nivard, >> >> Thank you so much for your time and effort, I guess it's going to be one >> of >> those occasions where there is a gap in the data. Such a shame, but we're >> very fortunate to have as much of the censuses as we do, aren't we? >> >> Thanks once again, best wishes, >> >> Jon > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 5 > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:11:01 -0000 > From: "J. Nixey" <jons.family.tree@btinternet.com> > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <CB663E05DFF44F929A3AA579789DF551@jon577b3d5f2a9> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nivard Ovington" <ovington1@sky.com> > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 4:55 PM > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > >> I take it there was no residence mention on the baptism? > > Hi again Nivard, > > No, nothing at all, just names and date, that's it. > Just re-looking at the baptisms of David and Jane's children, the next one > was Mary Ann in 1843 again at Upton c. Chalvey, but no child inbetween. So, > they could well have been elsewhere in 1841? > This family is purposely annoying me I think. Grin. They had a son, Joseph, > in late 1846 but I can't find a baptism record for him, and their youngest > son, David b1859 was registered at birth as David, bapt as David, and is in > the 1871 census as William. > > I think I need to take something to calm my nerves......:-) > > All the best, Jon > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 6 > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:33:28 -0000 > From: "Martin Samson" <martinsamson@btinternet.com> > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <15AE4D1C50C84088A1A6254C680DA9FA@MartinPC> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > No sign of them in the 1841 census > > The nearest I can find from the 1851 census is Daniel NIXEY born ca 1818 > Upton with his wife Jane and son James born ca 1839/1940 Upton at Lane's > Row, Langley Marish > > Nixey Daniel 32 Head Agricultural Labourer Upton, Buckinghamshire > Nixey Jane 32 Wife - Clewer, Berkshire > Nixey James 10 Son - Upton, Buckinghamshire > Nixey John 7 Son - Langley, Buckinghamshire > Nixey Joseph 4 Son - Langley, Buckinghamshire > Nixey Emma 2 Daur - Langley, Buckinghamshire > Nixey Ann 4MO Daur - Langley, Buckinghamshire > > Any chance that this is your family? > > regards > > Martin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J. Nixey" <jons.family.tree@btinternet.com> > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:01 PM > Subject: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I've tried ancestry and findmypast but have failed to find David NIXEY >> born about 1818 at Upton c. Chalvey, with his wife Jane, and son James >> Henry who was bapt at UcC Nov 10, 1839. >> >> I know none of the censuses are %100 complete. I was wondering, would >> someone who had access to this census on different websites to ancestry >> and findmypast or who had the Bucks 1841 index would be so kind as to have >> a peek to see if they show up at all please? >> >> Very many thanks to anyone who can help. Kind regards to all, >> >> Jon >> *************************************** >> >> BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ >> BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ >> Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> BUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> >> >> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) >> Database version: 5.11880 >> http://www.pctools.com/uk/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) > Database version: 5.11880 > http://www.pctools.com/uk/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 7 > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 19:42:26 -0000 > From: "Martin Samson" <martinsamson@btinternet.com> > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <B0D55949F5E3499C8F0A6EBDB91FCFE1@MartinPC> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Jon > > Prior to my previous message > > I have just checked the image for the 1851 census rathert tjhan just the > transcription (which I should have done in the first place!) and the name is > definiitely DAVID not DANIEL > > The wife's name is JANE and the eldest son's name is JAMES and he appears to > be 11 rather than 10 > > regards > > Martin > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "J. Nixey" <jons.family.tree@btinternet.com> > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 5:11 PM > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: "Nivard Ovington" <ovington1@sky.com> >> To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 4:55 PM >> Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY >> >> >>> I take it there was no residence mention on the baptism? >> >> Hi again Nivard, >> >> No, nothing at all, just names and date, that's it. >> Just re-looking at the baptisms of David and Jane's children, the next one >> was Mary Ann in 1843 again at Upton c. Chalvey, but no child inbetween. >> So, >> they could well have been elsewhere in 1841? >> This family is purposely annoying me I think. Grin. They had a son, >> Joseph, >> in late 1846 but I can't find a baptism record for him, and their youngest >> son, David b1859 was registered at birth as David, bapt as David, and is >> in >> the 1871 census as William. >> >> I think I need to take something to calm my nerves......:-) >> >> All the best, Jon >> >> *************************************** >> >> BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ >> BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ >> Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> BUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> >> >> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) >> Database version: 5.11880 >> http://www.pctools.com/uk/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) > Database version: 5.11880 > http://www.pctools.com/uk/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 8 > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:22:51 -0000 > From: "J. Nixey" <jons.family.tree@btinternet.com> > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <ED017D556ED24D8AB38317A9157BB92A@jon577b3d5f2a9> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; > reply-type=original > > Hi Martin, > > Thanks for your time and effort, it's appreciated. > I have David and Jane in all appropriate censuses except 1841 sadly. > But I really do appreciate your willingness to help. > > Kindest regards and best wishes, > > Jon > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 9 > Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:57:12 -0000 > From: "Martin Samson" <martinsamson@btinternet.com> > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <AA24AF60C73E43B4ACCDA0D6DCC6841F@MartinPC> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > John > > Free BMD gives a David NIXEY marriage registered Windsor 1Q 1838 Vol 6 page 315. > > There are eight names under the same reference four male and four female but the > only Jane is Jane PAYNE > > It might be worth ordering the marriage certificate from GRO to see if this is > "your" David > > I caanot find the registration of the birth of James in the GRO Index between > Sep 1837 and 1841 > > There are several possible reasons why - > > First he was not registered as registration was still quite new in 1939 butt > here are several other HIXEY children who were > > Second the GRO Index is not complete and has ommissions and errors > > There is also the possibility that James was born before the actual marriage and > baptised afterwards - not unknown > > regards > > Martin > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) > Database version: 5.11880 > http://www.pctools.com/uk/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ > > ------------------------------ > > To contact the BUCKS list administrator, send an email to > BUCKS-admin@rootsweb.com. > > To post a message to the BUCKS mailing list, send an email to > BUCKS@rootsweb.com. > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to BUCKS-request@rootsweb.com > with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and the body of > the > email with no additional text. > > End of BUCKS Digest, Vol 4, Issue 39 > ************************************ > > >

John Free BMD gives a David NIXEY marriage registered Windsor 1Q 1838 Vol 6 page 315. There are eight names under the same reference four male and four female but the only Jane is Jane PAYNE It might be worth ordering the marriage certificate from GRO to see if this is "your" David I caanot find the registration of the birth of James in the GRO Index between Sep 1837 and 1841 There are several possible reasons why - First he was not registered as registration was still quite new in 1939 butt here are several other HIXEY children who were Second the GRO Index is not complete and has ommissions and errors There is also the possibility that James was born before the actual marriage and baptised afterwards - not unknown regards Martin E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) Database version: 5.11880 http://www.pctools.com/uk/spyware-doctor-antivirus/

Hi Martin, Thanks for your time and effort, it's appreciated. I have David and Jane in all appropriate censuses except 1841 sadly. But I really do appreciate your willingness to help. Kindest regards and best wishes, Jon

Jon Prior to my previous message I have just checked the image for the 1851 census rathert tjhan just the transcription (which I should have done in the first place!) and the name is definiitely DAVID not DANIEL The wife's name is JANE and the eldest son's name is JAMES and he appears to be 11 rather than 10 regards Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. Nixey" <jons.family.tree@btinternet.com> To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 5:11 PM Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Nivard Ovington" <ovington1@sky.com> > To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 4:55 PM > Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > > >> I take it there was no residence mention on the baptism? > > Hi again Nivard, > > No, nothing at all, just names and date, that's it. > Just re-looking at the baptisms of David and Jane's children, the next one > was Mary Ann in 1843 again at Upton c. Chalvey, but no child inbetween. > So, > they could well have been elsewhere in 1841? > This family is purposely annoying me I think. Grin. They had a son, > Joseph, > in late 1846 but I can't find a baptism record for him, and their youngest > son, David b1859 was registered at birth as David, bapt as David, and is > in > the 1871 census as William. > > I think I need to take something to calm my nerves......:-) > > All the best, Jon > > *************************************** > > BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ > BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ > Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > BUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) > Database version: 5.11880 > http://www.pctools.com/uk/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) Database version: 5.11880 http://www.pctools.com/uk/spyware-doctor-antivirus/

No sign of them in the 1841 census The nearest I can find from the 1851 census is Daniel NIXEY born ca 1818 Upton with his wife Jane and son James born ca 1839/1940 Upton at Lane's Row, Langley Marish Nixey Daniel 32 Head Agricultural Labourer Upton, Buckinghamshire Nixey Jane 32 Wife - Clewer, Berkshire Nixey James 10 Son - Upton, Buckinghamshire Nixey John 7 Son - Langley, Buckinghamshire Nixey Joseph 4 Son - Langley, Buckinghamshire Nixey Emma 2 Daur - Langley, Buckinghamshire Nixey Ann 4MO Daur - Langley, Buckinghamshire Any chance that this is your family? regards Martin ----- Original Message ----- From: "J. Nixey" <jons.family.tree@btinternet.com> To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 12:01 PM Subject: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > Hi everyone, > > I've tried ancestry and findmypast but have failed to find David NIXEY > born about 1818 at Upton c. Chalvey, with his wife Jane, and son James > Henry who was bapt at UcC Nov 10, 1839. > > I know none of the censuses are %100 complete. I was wondering, would > someone who had access to this census on different websites to ancestry > and findmypast or who had the Bucks 1841 index would be so kind as to have > a peek to see if they show up at all please? > > Very many thanks to anyone who can help. Kind regards to all, > > Jon > *************************************** > > BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ > BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ > Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > BUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) > Database version: 5.11880 > http://www.pctools.com/uk/spyware-doctor-antivirus/ E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (6.0.0.386) Database version: 5.11880 http://www.pctools.com/uk/spyware-doctor-antivirus/

----- Original Message ----- From: "Nivard Ovington" <ovington1@sky.com> To: <bucks@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2009 4:55 PM Subject: Re: [BKM] 1841 Census - Missing: David, Jane & James NIXEY > I take it there was no residence mention on the baptism? Hi again Nivard, No, nothing at all, just names and date, that's it. Just re-looking at the baptisms of David and Jane's children, the next one was Mary Ann in 1843 again at Upton c. Chalvey, but no child inbetween. So, they could well have been elsewhere in 1841? This family is purposely annoying me I think. Grin. They had a son, Joseph, in late 1846 but I can't find a baptism record for him, and their youngest son, David b1859 was registered at birth as David, bapt as David, and is in the 1871 census as William. I think I need to take something to calm my nerves......:-) All the best, Jon

Hi Jon You are most welcome I take it there was no residence mention on the baptism? I do not see a birth registration so that wouldn't help either Mind you its still a long time between the birth and the 1841 so it may not help anyway You never know he may turn up one day Best wishes Nivard Ovington, in Cornwall (UK) > Hi Nivard, > > Thank you so much for your time and effort, I guess it's going to be one > of > those occasions where there is a gap in the data. Such a shame, but we're > very fortunate to have as much of the censuses as we do, aren't we? > > Thanks once again, best wishes, > > Jon

Hi Nivard, Thank you so much for your time and effort, I guess it's going to be one of those occasions where there is a gap in the data. Such a shame, but we're very fortunate to have as much of the censuses as we do, aren't we? Thanks once again, best wishes, Jon

Hi Jon I have had a virtual wander around those areas under Upton cum Chalvey in 1841 but found no obvious David NIXEY I did find several other NIXEYs but am sure you have those as they are quite clear, there were a few pages with entries so feint that you could not read them at all, perhaps David is on one of those I even took in the workhouse just in case but nothing there, interesting that the person that filled in the workhouse forms took the trouble of noting the Parishes to which the inmates belonged, a nice clear hand too He should be around as you know as his son was born there in 1839 but later he is in Langley, I checked the index for Langley in 1841 but nothing obvious leaps out Be interested to see if he does turn up in another index Best wishes Nivard Ovington, in Cornwall (UK) > Hi everyone, > > I've tried ancestry and findmypast but have failed to find David NIXEY > born about 1818 at Upton c. Chalvey, with his wife Jane, and son James > Henry who was bapt at UcC Nov 10, 1839. > > I know none of the censuses are %100 complete. I was wondering, would > someone who had access to this census on different websites to ancestry > and findmypast or who had the Bucks 1841 index would be so kind as to have > a peek to see if they show up at all please? > > Very many thanks to anyone who can help. Kind regards to all, > > Jon

Hi everyone, I've tried ancestry and findmypast but have failed to find David NIXEY born about 1818 at Upton c. Chalvey, with his wife Jane, and son James Henry who was bapt at UcC Nov 10, 1839. I know none of the censuses are %100 complete. I was wondering, would someone who had access to this census on different websites to ancestry and findmypast or who had the Bucks 1841 index would be so kind as to have a peek to see if they show up at all please? Very many thanks to anyone who can help. Kind regards to all, Jon

Charlotte Many thanks for looking for me, and thanks for the suggestion about Hugh Wallis's site. Eunice ceaster99@aol.com wrote: > Eunice wrote: > > > > > ?<I know I need to go to the CBS as they have some registers there, but until > I can find the time, I wondered if anyone has come across William Rice > Tucker and Jane Wood in their travels.> > > I don't know if there are other registers besides what has been extracted onto the > IGI, but I checked the Baptist Lower-Meeting House (1773-1837) and they are not > there.? You can bring up the whole baptismal list through Hugh Wallis site.? No > Tucker and no Wood at all. > > Charlotte > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: bucks-request@rootsweb.com > To: bucks@rootsweb.com > Sent: Wed, 18 Feb 2009 1:03 am > Subject: BUCKS Digest, Vol 4, Issue 32 > > > > > > The default format for the Digest is Plain text. If you prefer to receive your > Digest in MIME format, please contact the list administrator. > > ************************************** > > Today's Topics: > > 1. TUCKER (Baptists - Old Amersham) (Eunice Cubbage) > 2. Holmes family (Margaret Holmes) > 3. Re: Holmes family (Paul Irving) > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Message: 1 > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:16:06 +0000 > From: Eunice Cubbage <eunice@cubbage.plus.com> > Subject: [BKM] TUCKER (Baptists - Old Amersham) > To: bucks@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: <499A8056.9000505@cubbage.plus.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Having recently rediscovered an old Family History notebook of mine, > I have been revisiting my husband's Tucker ancestors, and thought I'd ask > for some help. > > On a Tucker line which ended up in my village of Holmer Green, I have > gone back as far as William Tucker, born 1831 in Amersham, who may have been > the son of William Rice Tucker and Jane Wood. I had an interview with a > descendant of these Tuckers several years ago, and she told me that the > family were originally Baptists from old Amersham. > > I know I need to go to the CBS as they have some registers there, but until > I can find the time, I wondered if anyone has come across William Rice > Tucker and Jane Wood in their travels. > > I would be grateful for any help.... > > Eunice Cubbage > > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 2 > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:15:43 -0000 > From: "Margaret Holmes" <margaret.holmes4@ntlworld.com> > Subject: [BKM] Holmes family > To: <BUCKS@rootsweb.com> > Message-ID: <109CFC32A67B4CEC9C385F527B08CDDD@holmesd428a94c> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > I am researching my husband's family. They appear in the Great Brickhill Parish > Register from 1722 to 1891 when they moved to Bletchley. > JOHN HOLMES married SARAH BRINSTER in Great Brickhill in 1722. > JAMES HOLMES married ANNE WRIGHT in 1734. > However there do not appear to be any HOLMES in Great Brickhill prio > r to that > date. I cannot find any BRINSTERs at all. > Is anyone else researching these families? I have searched the Bow Brickhill > site but no luck there. Margaret Holmes > > ------------------------------ > > Message: 3 > Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2009 21:34:17 +0000 > From: Paul Irving <pauljirving@ntlworld.com> > Subject: Re: [BKM] Holmes family > To: bucks@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: <499B2D59.5060003@ntlworld.com> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Not a lot in Bow Brickhill, either. > > Hannah d John (HOMES) christened 31-10-1714, then nothing until a > marriage in 1832, a couple more christenings in the 1840s & one in 1960. > (Bletchley Arch & Hist. Soc transcript) > > Paul > > > Margaret Holmes wrote: >> I am researching my husband's family. They appear in the Great Brickhill > Parish Register from 1722 to 1891 when they moved to Bletchley. >> JOHN HOLMES married SARAH BRINSTER in Great Brickhill in 1722. >> JAMES HOLMES married ANNE WRIGHT in 1734. >> However there do not appear to be any HOLMES in Great Brickhill prior to that > date. I cannot find any BRINSTERs at all. >> Is anyone else researching these families? I have searched the Bow Brickhill > site but no luck there. Margaret Holmes >> *************************************** >> >> BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ >> BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ >> Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to BUCKS-request@rootsweb.com > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of > the message >> >> > > > > ------------------------------ > > To contact the BUCKS list administrator, send an email to > BUCKS-admin@rootsweb.com. > > To post a message to the BUCKS mailing list, send an email to > BUCKS@rootsweb.com. > > __________________________________________________________ > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to BUCKS-request@rootsweb.com > with the word "unsubscribe" without the quotes in the subject and > the body of > the > email with no additional text. > > > End of BUCKS Digest, Vol 4, Issue 32 > ************************************ > > *************************************** > > BGS Website: http://www.bucksgs.org.uk/ > BFHS Website: http://www.bucksfhs.org.uk/ > Bucks Genuki Website: http://met.open.ac.uk/genuki/big/eng/BKM/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to BUCKS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 8.0.237 / Virus Database: 270.10.25/1957 - Release Date: 02/17/09 07:07:00 >