Sherry - thanks for the info. On the one hand I agree that it might be boring for other people, on the other hand, seeing surnames of people connected to that family might help someone find a link for their family ......... Have a good day. Regards Angie > Yes, Angie, there were, I have sent a list privately > to avoid boring > everyone/clogging the list. Searching: RAYKH-ZELIGMAN/RICHMAN, Stakliskes, Lithuania/Leeds COHEN, Sakiai, Lithuania/Leeds MAGIDOWITZ, Jurbarkas, Lithuania/Leeds KASSIMOFF, Rezekne, Latvia/Leeds ____________________________________________________________________________________ Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ

Angie, I don't think the sending of long gen reports on specific individuals is of general interest. I can't do it and then moan at other people for doing it! Gen reports are definitely an off-list item. If the recipient then wants to paraphrase and let the list know what other names they found from it i.e. "re COHEN I now know that other families involved were LEVY, SMITH and BLOGGS if anyone thinks they have a connection feel free to email me" that's fine for the whole list. So, will you paraphrase for the list? Love Sherry On 15/04/2008, Angie Elfassi <aelfassi51@yahoo.com> wrote: On the one hand I agree that it might be boring for other people, on the other hand, seeing surnames of people connected to that family might help someone find a link for their family