THANKYOU, BUT PLEASE UNSUBSCIBE ME , I AM GETTING TO MANY EMAILS FROM OTHER RESEARCHERS FOR BRINAMES. KELLIE FISHER

--part1_84.151951ae.281c4fe8_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --part1_84.151951ae.281c4fe8_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: <Pmc248@cs.com> From: Pmc248@cs.com Full-name: Pmc248 Message-ID: <20.15a6322e.281c4f52@cs.com> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 12:52:34 EDT Subject: RENNEY- correction. To: UK-NORTHEAST-L@rootsweb.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: CompuServe 2000 32-bit sub 107 Sorry, the type jumped. The correct address should be :- Pam Renney McKinley, 701, S. Dobson Road, No 140. Mesa, Arizona, USA. 85202. "E" mail:- Pmc248@cs.com --part1_84.151951ae.281c4fe8_boundary--

--part1_c.14e566a5.281c4cc6_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --part1_c.14e566a5.281c4cc6_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-path: <Pmc248@cs.com> From: Pmc248@cs.com Full-name: Pmc248 Message-ID: <f2.9be05df.281c4c2b@cs.com> Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2001 12:39:07 EDT Subject: RENNEY"S of County Durham. To: UK-NORTHEAST-L@rootsweb.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: CompuServe 2000 32-bit sub 107 Hello, If you are a RENNEY or know a RENNEY from County Durham, please consider this. Are you connected to Andrew RENNEY who was born in Killan, Angus in 1698, and relocated to Gateshead, County Durham, where he married and started a family which is still in County Durham to this day. Or maybe you are connected to Joseph RENNEY born at Sunderland in 1757 and who married Isabella Boo in 1780, they had at least 8 children who also married and had more RENNEYS. One of their children, James, married an ANN DOWNS at Sunderland and they emigrated to America. If you don't connect with those maybe Henry RENNEY, The Master Builder, who was married to Elizabeth DODDS, and lived on Gladstone Street, Roker, Sunderland sounds familiar to you.They had 2 sons Charles, and Frederick, [born 1857] and possibly more. Frederick was my Grandfather, he married Elizabeth SMITH and they lived at Bishopwearmouth for a short time and then moved to West Hartlepool.They raised 13 children at Stranton, their many descendants are still believed to be in that area. They attended All Saints Church and several are buried at Stranton and North Cemetery., Some may possibly be living at Ferryhill today. Have much more info. on this Family, contact me at :- Pam Renney McKinley, or "E" Mail me at :- 701, S. Dobson Road, Pmc248@cs.com Mesa, Arizona, USA. 85202. Hope to hear from you, Pam in Arizona, originally from Aldershot, Hants, England. P.S. All the above mentioned people are descended from Andrew RENNEY, born in 1698, as are most, if not all of the RENNEYS in County Durham today. I have lots of names and connections to share. --part1_c.14e566a5.281c4cc6_boundary--

As I am having trouble accessing attachments through my provider one.tel.au could you please direct my mail to kathleenannwilkins@hotmail.com Thank you Kathleen Wilkins > ------------------------------ > > Content-Type: text/plain > > BRIT-SURNAMES-D Digest Volume 01 : Issue 147 > > Today's Topics: > #1 [BRITNAMES] HARRISON, Edward Rober ["H" <chezmaison@btinternet.com>] > > Administrivia: > To unsubscribe from BRIT-SURNAMES-D, send a message to > > BRIT-SURNAMES-D-request@rootsweb.com > > that contains in the body of the message the command > > unsubscribe > > and no other text. No subject line is necessary, but if your software > requires one, just use unsubscribe in the subject, too. > > To contact the BRIT-SURNAMES-D list administrator, send mail to > BRIT-SURNAMES-admin@rootsweb.com. > > visit the list web page, > http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~capstick/britsurnames.htm > you can also post surname queries here, > http://pluto.beseen.com/boardroom/p/48323/ > > > > ______________________________ > ------------------------------ > > X-Message: #1 > Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:48:21 +0100 > From: "H" <chezmaison@btinternet.com> > To: BRIT-SURNAMES-L@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: <005801c0cdd1$7a7ac8e0$3325073e@a3t1b1> > Subject: [BRITNAMES] HARRISON, Edward Robert > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="Windows-1252" > > HARRISON, Edward Robert Born 1907 > HARRISON, Edward Robert Born approx. 1880 > I am looking for information on the above. > Lived in the Plaistow/Canning Town area,London > Any info appreciated. > Sue > > -------------------------------- > End of BRIT-SURNAMES-D Digest V01 Issue #147 > ******************************************** > --------------------------------------------- This message was sent using One.Net's Mail Man. http://mailman.one.net.au

Can anyone help me search my family name? I am searching the name Peart. My grandfather originated from a small town in the NE of England called Pityme near Durham. Thanks a million Robert Peart

HARRISON, Edward Robert Born 1907 HARRISON, Edward Robert Born approx. 1880 I am looking for information on the above. Lived in the Plaistow/Canning Town area,London Any info appreciated. Sue

----- Original Message ----- From: "George W. Durman" <georgedurman@home.com> To: <VIRUS-DISCUSSION-L@rootsweb.com> : OK, let's see if I can explain this so that everyone understands : how these latest viruses, trojans, and worms work. : : Let's start with the very latest, W32/Badtrans@MM, also seen : as W32/Badtrans@M. Here are other aliases that have been : found: : : Backdoor-NK.svr , : BadTrans (F-Secure), : I-Worm.Badtrans (AVP), : W32.Badtrans.13312@mm (NAV). : : There are several things about this one that need to be discussed, : how it is spread, and the danger to the infected user's computer. : : 1) W32/Badtrans@MM is received as a REAL attachment : (more about "real" vs. "inline" attachments later). It comes as an : actual file attachment, which is downloaded to a user's computer : into whatever directory is set up for such downloads. For : Eudora, Pegasus, and other "stand alone" email programs, : this will be something like "Downloads", "Attachments", etc. : For MS Outlook and MS Outlook Express, I'm not sure where : a separate attached file is placed. : : 2) A user's computer is NOT infected UNTIL he/she clicks on : the attachment and "runs" it, that is, executes it so that it does : whatever it's supposed to do. : : 3) Once a user clicks the attachment, it installs itself on to the : user's computer. It then does two things: : : a) It propagates itself so that every time the system is rebooted, : it mails itself to the sender of EVERY UNREAD EMAIL in the user's : MS Outlook FOLDERS. Notice that I say "folders", not "folder". : That means that if you filter incoming email into various created : folders, this trojan/virus searches all of them, not just the IN BOX. : : HERE'S THE REALLY DIRTY PART: The virus looks through : all those unread emails; it finds the originator of them (FROM:) : and REPLIES to the person who sent the original email. BUT, : it also attaches a copy of the infected file and mails it along : with the "reply". Thus, if John Doe sends an email to a person, : or to a Mailing List, when that email ends up on another user's : email program, and that other user is infected and hasn't read : John's email, John receives a reply containing a copy of the : virus as a separate clickable file. : : HERE'S WHY USERS KEEP INSISTING THAT VIRUSES CAN : BE SPREAD BY ROOTSWEB MAILING LISTS, AND WHY : THEY THINK THE ATTACHMENT CAME THROUGH A : MAILING LIST: Let me give an example - : : John Doe sends a post to the SMITH-L Mailing List. John : Doe's system is NOT infected. Every one of the 2,000+ users : of the SMITH-L Mailing List receives a copy of John's : email. One of these users, let's call him Bill Smith, has the : W32/Badtrans@MM virus on his system. : : Now, Bill has a copy of John's email in his Outlook program. : He doesn't read it right away. He reboots his computer and, : when Windows restarts, the virus looks through Bill's email : in Outlook. It sends a reply to the sender of EVERY unread : email, AND attaches a copy of itself as a separate attachment. : It copies all the original headers, including those that show : the email came through SMITH-L@rootsweb.com. : : Then John, the original sender of the email, receives a : "reply" to his email, from Bill. John looks at the email and : sees that it is a reply to his original post. He also sees : SMITH-L@rootsweb.com in several of the headers. As : far as he's concerned, he has received a normal reply back : through the Mailing List. : : If John is a "newbie", one of two things happen: : : I) He sees an attached file, with a message something like, : "Take a look to the attachment." He says to himself, "This : Bill Smith is answering my original post, AND he has sent : me an attachment which is probably a file having something : to do with information on my query." He clicks the attachment; : thus ANOTHER SMITH-L Mailing List user is infected. : : or : : II) He is savvy enough to know NOT to open the attachment, : BUT from the looks of the "reply" it appears that it came : back to him via the Mailing List. He screams and curses, : and says, "I knew it! I don't care what the Listowners and : the folks at Rootsweb say, these virus attachments ARE : coming through the Mailing List!" He then posts angry : posts to all the Mailing Lists to which he subscribes, : calling the Listowners and Rootsweb people liars. He : thus starts another round of uninformed posts about how : attachments CAN be passed through Mailing Lists, and : about how viruses CAN also be passed through the Lists. : : In short, this virus/trojan tricks recipients of infected : email into thinking the virus is being propagated via a : Mailing List. NOT SO !!!!! : : b) The other thing this virus/trojan does is this: : : Once running, the trojan attempts to mail the victim's IP : Address to the author. Once this information is obtained, : the author can connect to the infected system via the Internet : and steal personal information such as usernames, and passwords. : In addition, the trojan also contains a keylogger program which is : capable of capturing other vital information such as credit card : and bank account numbers and passwords. : : 4) THIS IS WHY EVERY COMPUTER USER MUST HAVE : A FIREWALL ON HIS/HER COMPUTER !!!!! It doesn't matter : whether you are using a dialup modem, a cable modem, DSL, : or whatever, you NEED a firewall. A firewall is nothing more : than a small utility that prevents malicious people from entering : your system through a "back door". Once such a person has : your IP address, he/she can connect to your computer any : time your modem is connected, which is 27/7 for everyone but : those using a dialup modem. Of course, a dialup modem is : accessible only when you are actually "online". : : 5) So, PLEASE, let's stop this latest round of blaming Rootsweb : Mailing Lists for allowing attachments, and for propagating : viruses, trojans, worms, etc. I know that in the future, as new : users subscribe, many of them will come to the same erroneous : conclusions and start the thread all over again. They should : be politely, but firmly, advised of the true situation. : : 6) VERY IMPORTANT POINT: Some users insist that email : from Mailing Lists always comes as attachments. Not so! : SOME email programs, such as MS Outlook/Outlook Express : and AOL, convert ALL List email into attachments. This is : one of the most serious problems with such programs, and : causes users to think that they are receiving "real" attachments. : : "REAL" attachments are FILES that are outside the body : of an email, and come along with the email as a "rider". Other : so-called "attachments" are those that contain the actual text : from the body of an email. This is especially true for those : subscribers to the Digest Mode of Lists. MS Outlook and : AOL extract the body text and put it into "attachments". : : To the poster who was worried about "viruses going around : on the GEN-NEWBIE Mailing List": I hope you can see from : the above that the viruses are being sent from infected users' : computers, users who happen to be receiving email from the : List. : : This point MUST be made: If any user receives an infected : email, or an infected attached file, and it appears to have : come through a Mailing List, IT DID NOT. Blame the : problems, and resulting confusion, on a virus-writer who : is a little smarter than the average gomer. : : To end, here's a list of the KNOWN file-names that the : W32/Badtrans@MM virus/trojan uses: : : Card.pif : docs.scr : fun.pif : hamster.ZIP.scr : Humor.TXT.pif : images.pif : New_Napster_Site.DOC.scr : news_doc.scr : Me_nude.AVI.pif : Pics.ZIP.scr : README.TXT.pif : s3msong.MP3.pif : searchURL.scr : SETUP.pif : Sorry_about_yesterday.DOC.pif : YOU_are_FAT!.TXT.pif : : So far, I have received virus attachments with the names : "README.TXT.pif" and "Sorry_about-yesterday.DOC.pif". : : Anyone reading this has my permission to copy it and : repost to individuals or other Mailing Lists. : : SgtGeorge : George W. Durman : VIRUS-DISCUSSION Listowner :

Hi Stella and everyone, don't know if I am doing the right thing, but I received two of the same emails as you Stella, I didn't open them, but they have come from a response I made to a list member on this list yesterday - they both have the text that was my response and then "take a look at the attachment". I won't mention the names that they have come from - if the List Owner wants to contact me so they know, please do. All the best, Maree ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stella Stanger" <sstanger@sfu.ca> To: <BRIT-SURNAMES-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:56 AM Subject: [BRITNAMES] MURCON > Dear Listmembers Yesterday, I received a message from the above. > > ( in response to my e mail to another listmembers request to unsubscribe > from this mailing list.) > > There was no message in the e mail section - but at the bottom of the e > mail, below the area with the name of the list: Brit -Surnames - and the > reference to John Fullers mail list refs. > (this area with the reference to John Fullers site - was only partially > complete - the remainder mentioned ,Take a look to the attachment. > there was an attachment - with the letters MS -and links in red/purple and > yellow - and the words fun.pif. > > Today - I received an e mail from another listmember ? - with no > message except for the request from Maljohnson request to unsubscribe. > this piece of mail - also had the MS attachment -. > > Since I don't open attachments - I have no idea what this is. Has anyone > else received anything like this - does anyone happen to know what it > is.? I have a feeling -. > Cheers, Stella > > > ==== BRIT-SURNAMES Mailing List ==== > To post a message to the list send to, > BRIT-SURNAMES-L@rootsweb.com >

Sorry I know this is off subject for the list however it is important-- if you are not running a good anti virus program that will detect a virus before you open it then I suggest you do not open any attachments at this point. This is a prime time for virus activity. If you do not have an anti virus program you can download one free from the internet, the following sites will get you there http://www.antivirus.ca.com http://www.mcafee.com all the best Don ----- Original Message ----- From: "M Posthuma" <mpps@alphalink.com.au> To: <BRIT-SURNAMES-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 6:29 AM Subject: Re: [BRITNAMES] MURCON > Hi Stella and everyone, don't know if I am doing the right thing, but I > received two of the same emails as you Stella, I didn't open them, but they > have come from a response I made to a list member on this list yesterday - > they both have the text that was my response and then "take a look at the > attachment". I won't mention the names that they have come from - if the > List Owner wants to contact me so they know, please do. > All the best, > Maree > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Stella Stanger" <sstanger@sfu.ca> > To: <BRIT-SURNAMES-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2001 3:56 AM > Subject: [BRITNAMES] MURCON > > > > Dear Listmembers Yesterday, I received a message from the above. > > > > ( in response to my e mail to another listmembers request to unsubscribe > > from this mailing list.) > > > > There was no message in the e mail section - but at the bottom of the e > > mail, below the area with the name of the list: Brit -Surnames - and the > > reference to John Fullers mail list refs. > > (this area with the reference to John Fullers site - was only partially > > complete - the remainder mentioned ,Take a look to the attachment. > > there was an attachment - with the letters MS -and links in red/purple and > > yellow - and the words fun.pif. > > > > Today - I received an e mail from another listmember ? - with no > > message except for the request from Maljohnson request to unsubscribe. > > this piece of mail - also had the MS attachment -. > > > > Since I don't open attachments - I have no idea what this is. Has anyone > > else received anything like this - does anyone happen to know what it > > is.? I have a feeling -. > > Cheers, Stella > > > > > > ==== BRIT-SURNAMES Mailing List ==== > > To post a message to the list send to, > > BRIT-SURNAMES-L@rootsweb.com > > > > > ==== BRIT-SURNAMES Mailing List ==== > Other Rootsweb Genealogy Lists, > http://lists.rootsweb.com/ > >

Dear Listmembers - I have tried to Contact Dorothy WASS - to let her know that the MS fun gf was attached to a piece of mail. I have just received a message from the e mail address of DOROTHY WASS - with another attachment: this time it says Take A Look - attachment - the attachment says. HAMSTER.ZIP.scr. - Again: I don't open attachments - but am concerned that this may be another virus plaguing our e mails. Cheers. Stella Dear Listmembers Yesterday, I received a message from the above. ( in response to my e mail to another listmembers request to unsubscribe from this mailing list.) There was no message in the e mail section - but at the bottom of the e mail, below the area with the name of the list: Brit -Surnames - and the reference to John Fullers mail list refs. (this area with the reference to John Fullers site - was only partially complete - the remainder mentioned ,Take a look to the attachment. there was an attachment - with the letters MS -and links in red/purple and yellow - and the words fun.pif. Today - I received an e mail from another listmember ? - with no message except for the request from Maljohnson request to unsubscribe. this piece of mail - also had the MS attachment -. Since I don't open attachments - I have no idea what this is. Has anyone else received anything like this - does anyone happen to know what it is.? I have a feeling -. Cheers, Stella

Dear Listmembers Yesterday, I received a message from the above. ( in response to my e mail to another listmembers request to unsubscribe from this mailing list.) There was no message in the e mail section - but at the bottom of the e mail, below the area with the name of the list: Brit -Surnames - and the reference to John Fullers mail list refs. (this area with the reference to John Fullers site - was only partially complete - the remainder mentioned ,Take a look to the attachment. there was an attachment - with the letters MS -and links in red/purple and yellow - and the words fun.pif. Today - I received an e mail from another listmember ? - with no message except for the request from Maljohnson request to unsubscribe. this piece of mail - also had the MS attachment -. Since I don't open attachments - I have no idea what this is. Has anyone else received anything like this - does anyone happen to know what it is.? I have a feeling -. Cheers, Stella

I'm sorry to tell you this Kate but you have been infected with the virus. Renee L. Waring Reneelwaring@aol.com http://www.savinggraves.com/users/icm/

It certainly got a laugh out of me - great, thanks. Maree in Oz ----- Original Message ----- From: <Reneelwaring@aol.com> To: <BRIT-SURNAMES-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 24, 2001 10:53 AM Subject: [BRITNAMES] I just had to share this. If you don't need a good laugh don't read it. > Sorry, couldn't resist sending this on to all you who are interested in > digging up the past!! (and all you others with a great sense of humour too). > > "THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE" > The story behind the following letter is that there is a fellow in Newport, > RI named Scott Williams, who digs things out of his backyard and sends the > stuff he finds to the Smithsonian Institute, labeling them with scientific > names, and insisting that they are actual archaeological finds. This guy > really exists and does this in his spare time! Here is an actual response > from the Smithsonian Institute.. > > THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE > 207 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE > WASHINGTON, D.C. 20078 > > Mr. Scott Williams > Newport, Rhode Island > > Dear Mr. Williams: > Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled "93211-D, > layer seven, next to the clothesline > post...Hominid skull". > > We have given this specimen a careful and detailed examination, and regret to > inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents conclusive > proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two million years > ago. Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie > Doll, of the variety that one of our staff, who has small children, > Believes to be "Malibu Barbie". > It is evident that you have given a great deal of thought to the analysis of > this specimen, and you may be quite certain that those of us who are familiar > with your work in the field were loathe to come to contradiction with your > findings. > However, we do feel that there are a number of physical attributes of the > specimen which might have tipped you off to its modern origin: > 1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient Hominid remains are typically > fossilized bone. > 2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic centimeters, > well below the threshold of even the earliest identified proto-hominids. > 3. The dentition pattern evident on the skull is more consistent with the > common domesticated dog than it is with the ravenous man-eating Pliocene > clams you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time. > The latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses you > have submitted in your history with this Institution; but, the evidence seems > to weigh rather heavily against it. > Without going into too much detail, let us say that: > A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie Doll that a dog has chewed on. > B. Clams don't have teeth. > It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your request > that we approach the National Science Foundation Phyogeny Department with the > concept of assigning your specimen the scientific name "Australopithecus > Spiff-arino". > > Speaking personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of > your proposed taxonomy; but, was ultimately voted down because the species > name you selected was hyphenated, and didn't really sound like it might be > Latin. However, we gladly accept your generous donation of this fascinating > specimen to the museum. While it is undoubtedly not a Hominid fossil, it is, > nonetheless, yet another riveting example of the great body of work you seem > to accumulate here so effortlessly. > You should know that our Director has reserved a special shelf in his own > office for the display of the specimens you have > previously submitted to the Institute, and the entire staff speculates daily > on what you will happen upon next in your digs at the site you have > discovered in your Newport back yard. > We eagerly anticipate your trip to our nation's capital that you proposed in > your last letter, and several of us are pressing the Director to pay for it. > We are particularly interested in hearing you expand on your theories > surrounding the trans-positating fillifitation of ferrous metal in a > structural matrix that makes the excellent juvenile Tyrannosaurus Rex femur > you recently discovered take on the deceptive appearance of a rusty 9-mm > Sears Craftsman automotive crescent wrench. > > Yours in Science, > > HARVEY ROWE > Chief Curator - Antiquities > > > > ==== BRIT-SURNAMES Mailing List ==== > Guild of One Name Studies, > http://www.one-name.org/ >

Sorry, couldn't resist sending this on to all you who are interested in digging up the past!! (and all you others with a great sense of humour too). "THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE" The story behind the following letter is that there is a fellow in Newport, RI named Scott Williams, who digs things out of his backyard and sends the stuff he finds to the Smithsonian Institute, labeling them with scientific names, and insisting that they are actual archaeological finds. This guy really exists and does this in his spare time! Here is an actual response from the Smithsonian Institute.. THE SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTE 207 PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE WASHINGTON, D.C. 20078 Mr. Scott Williams Newport, Rhode Island Dear Mr. Williams: Thank you for your latest submission to the Institute, labeled "93211-D, layer seven, next to the clothesline post...Hominid skull". We have given this specimen a careful and detailed examination, and regret to inform you that we disagree with your theory that it represents conclusive proof of the presence of Early Man in Charleston County two million years ago. Rather, it appears that what you have found is the head of a Barbie Doll, of the variety that one of our staff, who has small children, Believes to be "Malibu Barbie". It is evident that you have given a great deal of thought to the analysis of this specimen, and you may be quite certain that those of us who are familiar with your work in the field were loathe to come to contradiction with your findings. However, we do feel that there are a number of physical attributes of the specimen which might have tipped you off to its modern origin: 1. The material is molded plastic. Ancient Hominid remains are typically fossilized bone. 2. The cranial capacity of the specimen is approximately 9 cubic centimeters, well below the threshold of even the earliest identified proto-hominids. 3. The dentition pattern evident on the skull is more consistent with the common domesticated dog than it is with the ravenous man-eating Pliocene clams you speculate roamed the wetlands during that time. The latter finding is certainly one of the most intriguing hypotheses you have submitted in your history with this Institution; but, the evidence seems to weigh rather heavily against it. Without going into too much detail, let us say that: A. The specimen looks like the head of a Barbie Doll that a dog has chewed on. B. Clams don't have teeth. It is with feelings tinged with melancholy that we must deny your request that we approach the National Science Foundation Phyogeny Department with the concept of assigning your specimen the scientific name "Australopithecus Spiff-arino". Speaking personally, I, for one, fought tenaciously for the acceptance of your proposed taxonomy; but, was ultimately voted down because the species name you selected was hyphenated, and didn't really sound like it might be Latin. However, we gladly accept your generous donation of this fascinating specimen to the museum. While it is undoubtedly not a Hominid fossil, it is, nonetheless, yet another riveting example of the great body of work you seem to accumulate here so effortlessly. You should know that our Director has reserved a special shelf in his own office for the display of the specimens you have previously submitted to the Institute, and the entire staff speculates daily on what you will happen upon next in your digs at the site you have discovered in your Newport back yard. We eagerly anticipate your trip to our nation's capital that you proposed in your last letter, and several of us are pressing the Director to pay for it. We are particularly interested in hearing you expand on your theories surrounding the trans-positating fillifitation of ferrous metal in a structural matrix that makes the excellent juvenile Tyrannosaurus Rex femur you recently discovered take on the deceptive appearance of a rusty 9-mm Sears Craftsman automotive crescent wrench. Yours in Science, HARVEY ROWE Chief Curator - Antiquities

DRAPER/OATEN/HOLLAND/BELL Looking into any of these names. Mainly in the Derby area or nearby them. OATEN in Bristol too. Thank you, Lisa Hoegerman Southern CA USA

Hello list, Searching the surname Alnwick. Any help would be great. I believe my family originated from North East England Regards,James

Sorry to tell you this Tim. I know it wasn't your doing. Please have your system cleansed. Renee L. Waring Reneelwaring@aol.com http://www.savinggraves.com/users/icm/

Hi Listers Researching FIELDHOUSE 1650-1720 Castle Church Staffordshire ANNE FIELDHOUSE married SAMUEL DICKENSON of Newport Shropshire (Salop) in Castle Church in 1699. Anyone have this family in your line? Regards Mary

I thought it time I submitted my list of names. The families were largely based in the East End of London, Middlesex and Essex, tending to move eastwards during the 19th century. Main Lines of research in the 19th century are: CARTER - John b.~1805 @ Greenwich; his son John (fishmonger)b. 1831 @ St Giles; his daughter Sarah Ann b.1860 @ Islington, and others. DELLOW/DELLAR/DELLER - lots. Based in Ilford, Forest Gate and West Ham. RAND - John & Jane from Ilford b.1790, Rebecca b.1810 @ Ilford ROSE - Thomas (licensed victualler in Croydon) b. ~1800; his son Richard b.1831 @ Croydon; his son Richard William b.1854 @ St George in the East;his daughters Louisa and Sarah A b.Silvertown SEWELL - George b.1849, James b.1888 - possible link to George Sewell the actor. WEATLEY / WHEATLEY - William b. ~1800, George b. ~1825, George b.1850 @ Poplar. Based in Poplar, Stratford, West Ham, Romford ALSO SEARCHING FOR: Allen, Clark, Claxton, Candelett etc.(from Manchester), Conley/Connolley, Cooper, Hennessey, Kelly, Knott, Mara, Middleton, Rooney, Sippitt, Stacey, Sutton, West, and Wright All names in Middlesex, London & Essex Please email me if you believe you may have a link or you may possibly have some data that might help me in my searches. Best Wishes Andy Wheatley

unsubscribe