Oh how lovely Pat, I'm glad my impulsive post has helped someone!! So many vicars would have left the father's section blank and we'd have been none the wiser. You're welcome!! Marion On 12 November 2010 22:04, Pat Hase <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Marion, > > Sarah is related to me!  On the 1871 census she is with her grandparents > Abraham & Caroline LONG but was entered as a Lilly a granddaughter  but I > didn't know her mother - I do now - thank you!  Ann was there as well. > Sarah is a 4th cousin once removed - not exactly close but nevertheless a > relative! > > Thank you > > Pat > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Marion" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]>; "bristol district" > <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:18 PM > Subject: [B&D] GUNTER/LONG - helpful vicar! > > >> The Rev Barratt at Hanham may have helped someone out with a difficult >> family with this entry >> >> Marriage, 22nd March 1884 >> George Albert GUNTER, 20, bach, coal miner of Kingswood, child of Mary >> GUNTER, a singlewoman, operative in Cotton Factory >> and >> Sarah Lilly LONG, 19, sp, no occ of Kingswood, child of Ann LONG, a >> singlewoman >> >> witnesses were Abraham LONG and Charlotte ROGERS. >> >> They're not related to me at all, but it might help someone out >> >> Marion >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >