Hi Joy, Bathbmd http://www.bathbmd.org.uk/cgi/birthind.cgi has quite a few children for your couple, but not Frederick, although it does show Albert Frederick in 1847...could they be the same person?. 1838 William James Cox 1841 Francis Charles Cox 1842 Sarah Ann Cox 1844 Albert Simon Cox 1845 Alfred Cox 1847 Albert Frederick Cox 1849 Edward Joseph Cox 1850 George Hale 1855 Walter Jesse Cox & Wellington George Cox 1857 Walter Benjamin >From Jenny http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~becher/index.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joy Hungerford" <m.hungerford@ntlworld.com> To: <bristol_and_district@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2010 4:22 AM Subject: [B&D] Frederick Albert COX > Hi Listers > > Having convinced myself that only three of the 14 children of my 2GGF, > Charles COX, married, two of whom produced offspring, I've been surprised > to find another of the 14, apparently alive and well in 1901, with wife > and three daughters, but in Marylebone, in London. > > Frederick is b Bath, aged 50 and a cabinet maker. Annoyingly, his wife, > Eliza, b Liverpool, abt 1859, could be Elizabeth MARTIN or Elizabeth > BOYLE, whom he m in 1886, Marylebone. > > This marriage names him as Frederick Albert, though I only have him as > Frederick. It is a little extra clue that he is my man, because a previous > brother (so many of them died in infancy!) was Albert Frederick. > During my recent PC/laptop woes, I lost various useful site addresses and > I would like to know if Frederick was baptised as Frederick Albert. > He was born in Bath about 1849, parents Charles and Charlotte, so if a > very Kind Soul, with access to the area records, could have a look and > tell me, I'll be more than grateful. He named one of his daughters > Charlotte, so all the clues make me almost certain that he is mine. > > Kind regards > Joy