In a message dated 10/30/2003 6:07:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, wesgann@juno.com writes: < Sorry but I only get my mail about once a week. Should I just not post anything because of that? > Perhaps you should read all your mail before you respond. If you had done that you would have seen that the person who sent that obnoxious message had been taken care of. We, really, didn't need to see it again. Julia

I have read ALL my mail and I do see where there has been a problem with everybody getting mail as of late and I saw NOTHING in response to show that the matter was taken care of or any type of discussion about taking care of the person. Maybe the list is still not sending all the mail to everyone for some reason. ----- Original Message ----- From: <JULIAFWOOD@aol.com> To: <BRIDGES-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 12:19 PM Subject: Re: [BRIDGES-L] New DNA Results Posted > In a message dated 10/30/2003 6:07:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, > wesgann@juno.com writes: > < > Sorry but I only get my mail about once a week. > Should I just not post anything because of that? > > > > Perhaps you should read all your mail before you respond. If you had done > that you would have seen that the person who sent that obnoxious message had > been taken care of. We, really, didn't need to see it again. > > Julia > >

Julia, May I ask how old you are? Donna Bridges Nashville JULIAFWOOD@aol.com wrote: >In a message dated 10/30/2003 6:07:47 AM Pacific Standard Time, >wesgann@juno.com writes: >< >Sorry but I only get my mail about once a week. >Should I just not post anything because of that? > > > >Perhaps you should read all your mail before you respond. If you had done >that you would have seen that the person who sent that obnoxious message had >been taken care of. We, really, didn't need to see it again. > >Julia > > > >