Dead end again. Thanks. > > From: "Betty Ann Bowles" <babowles@bellsouth.net> > Date: 2005/06/26 Sun PM 09:56:47 CDT > To: BOWLES-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: John Lemuel Bowles > > The Bowles family in 1870 Pendleton Co KY is JAMES Bowles not LEMUEL. I > verified this on Heritagequest and Ancestry.com. I found two John Bowles, > born Canada, living in Massachusetts but neither of their wives was names > Catherine/Katherine. > > Betty Ann Bowles > Kentucky > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom LaPorte" <tlaporte@mts.net> > To: <BOWLES-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2005 9:25 PM > Subject: Re: John Lemuel Bowles > > > > That one sounded so hopeful with the unusual name of Lemuel Bowles but all > the children's names are different. About Lemuel though, it's a family name > throughout that one Bowles branch in Canada but I don't know of it coming up > in any of the other Canadian branches. Does this Kentucky Bowles branch > happen to connect back to county Cavan, Ireland by any chance? > > > > > > > > From: MFeltnbrgr@aol.com > > > Date: 2005/06/26 Sun PM 12:17:43 CDT > > > To: BOWLES-L@rootsweb.com > > > Subject: John Lemuel Bowles > > > > > > The only one that comes even close to your information is the > following: > > > > > > Precinct No. 4 in the County of Pendleton, State of Kentucky 25 June > 1870 > > > > > > Lemuel Bowles age 28 > > > Catherine Bowles age 27 > > > Charles age 8 > > > Mary E age 6 > > > John A age 2 > > > William age 24 a farm hand > > > > > > Hope this helps. > > > > > > Marcy in California a decendant of David Bowles (Revolutionary War) > > > > > > > > > > Tom LaPorte > > > > > > > Tom LaPorte