Do what I do on these and reject the objections. The only people who would legitimately have a right to complain about their privacy being violated are the people involved. The objector isn't saying he's included in the obit. Joan In a message dated 11/22/2009 12:06:55 A.M. Eastern Standard Time, wendy.howard@gmail.com writes: I've had an objection to http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.aulenbacher/66/mb.ashx and http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.aulenbacher/62/mb.ashx with the comment "include identifiable information about living people without their direct consent" These posts are transcriptions of newspaper obituaries. Do you agree? Part of me does, but another part sees that this are copies of things that have appeared in newspapers and therefore already out in the public arena. Your feedback, please. :-) Kind Regards, Wendy ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to BOARDS-ADMINS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Thank you Joan! I knew there would be a sensible answer that was avoiding me in the fog known as my brain. :-) Wendy ----- Original Message ----- *From:* JYoung6180@aol.com *To:* boards-admins@rootsweb.com *Sent:* 11/22/2009 6:41:37 PM +1300 *Subject:* [BAd] help with objection please > Do what I do on these and reject the objections. The only people who would > legitimately have a right to complain about their privacy being violated > are the people involved. The objector isn't saying he's included in the obit. > > Joan