In a message dated 11/8/2006 12:59:30 AM Eastern Standard Time, gmakf@earthlink.net writes: Author: Ann Surnames: none mentioned Classification: Query In reply to: Re: Otto Daff by: Kathleen Fitzgerald Thanks for the information. I don't know a lot about my dad's side of the family but I did send the information to my cousin who knows more. Thanks Ann in Nashville anntnwv@aol.com . When I clicked on the "Judge Objection" tab on the Review Objection page, I found I had four choices: 1) Accept : Remove this message from the Daff message board 2) Reject: Don't remove this message from the Daff message board 3) Remove: Remove request. No notification will be sent 4) Unlock: Don't do anything at this time. Could someone explain 3 and 4? As you can see, there really aren't any surnames mentioned IN Ann's post...just DAFF which is in the title of the post being responded to and FITZGERALD, the surname of the person (me) who posted the message being responded to. Should I remove "none mentioned" and type in DAFF? This is the first time I have had to deal with an "Objection". What should I do? Mr. Anderson seems pretty determined to have this "corrected". Who is the "staff" that would have recommended he report this "abuse" to me and ask me to "correct" it? Bye for now, Kathleen Kathleen- First click on the message attached to the abuse report and fix the surnames entry. Remove the words "none mentioned" from the surnames box. You could then enter DAFF since it is in the subject line. Then back space to the abuse report and click to REMOVE the objection since you have dealt with it and fixed what the person has reported. Joan