Hello Kathleen: I replied in depth to your original message. I don't see a point in your reposting when you had already received no less than 3 replies that responded to all of your original questions. Even though you have removed names and email addresses and the message link, you still included someone's post that was sent to you in private. Making it anonymous rather than stating it is from "Dan" does not alter the fact of posting to an archived list that which was sent in private. It is not usual to have posts removed from the archives. However, when it is done, there is no need to replace them and it is ill-advised to do so. The world won't come to an end if they are not found in the archives. Cheers, Lauren On 11/12/06, K.Fitzgerald <gmakf@earthlink.net> wrote: > > This post was originally posted Nov.8th but had to be removed because I > included names. > For the original replies to make sense in the archives, I will repost a > revised version of my post. > My thanks to all who assisted me with this matter. > Bye for now, > Kathleen > . > Hi there, > > My server has been down for a few days now, I'm only able to access the > Internet tonight via a temporary 800 number they finally gave me a few hours > ago. After tending to my mailing lists and back log of emails, I had thought > I was done for the night when this email came in at 10:30 PM (Nov.7): > .<snip>