In a message dated 11/19/2006 2:25:55 PM Eastern Standard Time, cageycat@gmail.com writes: I wouldn't move the post. First, it refers to the original post - even though it's the poster's name. If you move it to "1st poster's name" board, first it has no context because it isn't connected "to" anything or anyone. 1st poster's name won't likely be anywhere near the "reply" --- even if we assume 1st poster EVER posted to her own surname board. So therefore, the ONLY logical place for 2nd post is with the original post. Just because a reply never mentions the Board Name does not *automatically* make it "inappropriate" for the 1st post. Judy --- I generally don't feel the need to jump on someone's answer with an "I agree" unless I have something to add--and I don't really have anything to add to Judy's reply, she's said it all, but just wanted to expend a tiny bit on what she said above.... Replies are judged by different criteria than original posts--the original posts must be pertinent to the board on which they are posted and the replies must be directly pertinent to the posts they are in reply to. Joan

I generally don't feel the need to jump on someone's answer with an "I agree" unless I have something to add--and I don't really have anything to add to Judy's reply, she's said it all, but just wanted to expend a tiny bit on what she said above.... Replies are judged by different criteria than original posts--the original posts must be pertinent to the board on which they are posted and the replies must be directly pertinent to the posts they are in reply to. Joan ------------------------------- Ok, Thanks everyone. You've given me more to think about. Rene'