Dan Anderson wrote: > > > On Feb 11, 2008 8:56 AM, singhals <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > > > I'm still not _quite_ grasping your issue -- I don't see it > as any of _MY_ business how another admin runs their board, > and if 57 different people post messages on the Grammarham > board with a SUBJ: HELP!! seems to me that's 57 different > problems that are simply NMP; meanwhile, I've made a habit > of not-visiting/reading boards which have what I consider to > be too-much mis-information. > > From my little foothold on reality, then, I don't see that > it matters where the system dumps me if I complain about a > post. (I mean, if I've just objected to something I've > read, why would I want to keep reading it? Masochism??) > > I don't get it. > > Cheryl > > > > Cheryl, > > I'm finished trying to explain why I would wish to read the REPLIES to a > message I posted an objection on. My foothold on reality says there > might be valuable information in those replies. Apparently, to others, > a misclassification or inappropriate use of the surnames field in *one* > post of a thread negates the remainder of that thread. > > Dan Since you're having so much trouble trying to make your fellow-admins see what the issue is, it's small wonder the uber-admins don't fix it. Cheryl -- There should be no attachments on this message, unless I specifically mentioned them above.