OK, it's my turn to ask a 'dumb' question: WHY on earth would anyone even begin to think that this type of annoyance would be good? Are the upper echelon so disconnected from reality? So many problems known as "bugs" need to be fixed & so many useful enhancements have been suggested by people that use these boards daily, I can only shake my head in disbelief and say "WHY??" So basically, it probably makes no difference whether we like it or find it useful OR what we give as feedback. The uppy-ups deemed it "needed" or "good" and we are stuck with it. OK, I feel better now I've had my fuss....... Sharon Dulcich ----------------------------------------- In a message dated 2/28/2008 8:37:21 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, [email protected] writes: This is most likely the result of an order to implement the links that came from the top and had to be added. **************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/ 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598)

They are trying to turn the boards into nothing but a sales tool for ancestry.com. I'll bet if you posted the below message on the boards, we'd be offered a link to "Annoyance family history facts," complete with the opportunity to purchase a book on the Annoyance surname. Nan ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2008 11:41 PM Subject: Re: [BAd] New Message Board Feature > OK, it's my turn to ask a 'dumb' question: > > WHY on earth would anyone even begin to think that this type of annoyance > would be good? Are the upper echelon so disconnected from reality? So > many > problems known as "bugs" need to be fixed & so many useful enhancements > have > been suggested by people that use these boards daily, I can only shake my > head > in disbelief and say "WHY??" > > So basically, it probably makes no difference whether we like it or find > it > useful OR what we give as feedback. The uppy-ups deemed it "needed" or > "good" > and we are stuck with it. > > OK, I feel better now I've had my fuss....... > > Sharon Dulcich > ----------------------------------------- > > In a message dated 2/28/2008 8:37:21 P.M. Pacific Standard Time, > [email protected] writes: > > This is most likely the result of an order to implement the links that > came > from the top and had to > be added. > > > > > > **************Ideas to please picky eaters. Watch video on AOL Living. > (http://living.aol.com/video/how-to-please-your-picky-eater/rachel-campos-duffy/ > 2050827?NCID=aolcmp00300000002598) > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >