But that volunteer is misusing the classification. It is not <i>meant</i> for the results of doing lookups. -----Original Message----- From: boards-admins-bounces@rootsweb.com on behalf of JYoung6180@aol.com Sent: Wed 8/30/2006 11:07 AM To: jaws64@comlinkusa.net; boards-admins@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [BAd] What's the Point of the Classification Feature? In a message dated 8/30/2006 1:54:30 PM Eastern Standard Time, jaws64@comlinkusa.net writes: If the name of the classification was simply changed to "volunteers" it would create misclassified posts. I have a prolific lookup volunteer on one board who posts everything she finds on an individual in one message - one week she made 27 posts of lookup information, but her average is 10-12 *per week*. As you can see, I use this classification frequently and would be opposed to **ANY** change whatsoever. Jackie There was talk during board testing sometime back about renaming this classification LOOKUP REQUESTS but I'm not exactly sure what that classification would encompass either--requests for lookups in specific publications and resources I think. I still feel those are better left as queries because that is what they are. Joan ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to BOARDS-ADMINS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message