RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [BAd] Help Question
    2. Janet Kruger
    3. > > > So this gives you the right to fix the classification and > the surnames...but > not the right to change the author's chosen subject. BUT thats the thing it was the chosen subject wasnt changed, I continued on with what the previous admin did. If the posts were John q. Public married Joanna Kostachowsk in Smithville 1918 Made it Public, Johnq -m- Kostachowski, Joanna - 1918 smithville, KS and if its an Obit. OBIT: Public, John, or Biography. BIO: Public, John Q Cemetery CEM: Public, John q I have seen this done on many boards other the Rootsweb and it helps elimate unwanted looks and easier searching. It wasnt that anything was deleted. Unless it was in the post already. But you all helped. Thanks J.KRuger

    07/22/2006 08:10:11
    1. Re: [BAd] Help Question
    2. Carolyne Gould
    3. At 2:10 PM -0500 7/22/06, Janet Kruger wrote: >If the posts were John q. Public married Joanna Kostachowsk in Smithville >1918 >Made it Public, Johnq -m- Kostachowski, Joanna - 1918 smithville, KS No, no, no, (IMHO). There was nothing wrong with the original subject line. The changes you made also made it impossible for someone to do a search of subject lines with the term "John q. Public." The new subject line as you changed it eliminates the find. I agree with Lynn. I would be very unhappy if you changed my subject lines for what appears to be no reason. Is the board in question a locality board? If it is, and it is the state of Kansas, or a county in Kansas, then the addition of the KS is also unnecessary. Now, if the subject line had said John m Joanna, that would be a different story. Carolyne

    07/22/2006 08:49:02