JYoung6180@aol.com wrote: >David- > >Actually it IS a rather unique situation and was only done by special >arrangements with RootsWeb in SPECIFIC cases--and, to my knowledge, it was NEVER >approved for surname list/boards. Mainly you will see this for locality >boards/lists when there are overlapping territories serviced by one of the >resources for which RootsWeb didn't want to create more lists or boards for a more >localized geogrphic area and thus permitted the multiple gatewaying of more >than one board to the one list. > >Joan > Thanks for the explanation, Joan. Lynne