As the second on the motion, I approve the change. And I would like to add that the response I have received from the everyday volunteer has been overwhelmingly in support of these "Alternate" logos. Most of the respondents would use the new logo. There were only two "negative" responses, the one that responded to my response, indicated that he had no problem with others using it. He just did not want to change. As I have said before, a couple of respondents had problems with the use of the flag. So I asked quite a few respondents their opinion, most wrote back and said that they thought it was respectfully done and they had no problem with it. No one wrote back that they thought it was disrespectful. One respondent said that they believed that there should be a project wide vote. So I asked some of those that responded if they agreed. The responses boil down to this "if" you get rid of the old one, yes, if this is just an "Alternate" then no. Of course this wasn't scientific, I did not count the number in favor only the small number that were not in favor of the "Alternate" logos. The tone of the positive responses was almost uplifting. There was a feeling of pride that seemed to flow from these responses. Something you should think about though, in these sorts of polls, Negative responses come more easily. It takes much more for someone to take the time to write "I like that" than "I hate that". Therefore I am I very much in favor of this motion, Thanks for listening, Jim