At 10:44 PM -0700 9/1/99, Tim Stowell wrote: >There were a couple of items left either undiscussed and/or unhandled by >the former Board. > >These items were, in no particular order: > >1. Discussion concerning a CC's right to ask for reimbursement of costs on >a county site and/or for contributions to further the site's offerings. Discussion is proceeding nicely on this issue on STATE-COORD-L. Since we are all on that list, and interpretation of ambiguous By-Laws is, in my opinion, best done by seeking to ascertain what the majority of the Project members think they should mean, we should probably let the discussion continue there for a while. >2. Fred Smoot's Formal Protest - published here earlier For ease of querying the threaded list archives, discussion on this protest would be best to take place as responses to Fred's original post to the BOARD-L, rather that under the subject "Old business." Can somebody who got that original message post something, anything, as a response to it, and then the rest of us can respond to that response, so that it will all stay in the same thread? Teri