You are correct, Teri, it would take a separate motion to delink. Joe Teri Pettit wrote: > > At 10:31 AM -0700 4/9/00, Pam Reid wrote: > >I agree with Holly that much more disussion on the Census Projects is > >needed, BUT, I do feel we should vote on the delinking issue - Motion > >00-8. The concerns expressed by everyone in the Project, from Census > >Project I and II members, to Board members, to volunteer transcribers, > >to the general constituency, can all be addressed in the discussion of > >Motion 00-6. > > Pam, > > I agree with you that we need to vote on Motion 00-8 and then seat > a Census Rep and then vote on Motion 00-6, in that order, and that > Tim's long sequence of forwarded messages and the email we've been > getting from constituents can be used to inform our discussion and > votes on Motion 00-6. > > The reference to Motion 00-8 as "the delinking issue" raises some > flags, though. I hope that everyone is clear that Motion 00-8 is NOT > a vote on the question "Should the non-Archives Census Project be > delinked from the National Pages?" > > It is specifically a vote on whether the National Coordinator's > unlinking of the Census Project should be reversed because the > proper procedures for the delinking of a project as outlined in > Article VI, Section 5 were not followed. > > It would require a separate motion to actually initiate the process > of Article VI, Section 5. > > -- Teri -- Zsedeny Genealogy - http://www.rootsweb.com/~jzed/home.htm NDGenWeb Archives - http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgenweb/nd/ndfiles.htm Pembina County, ND - http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndpembin/pembina.htm Ramsey County, ND - http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndramsey/ramsey.htm