Sounds fine to me. Ginger gingerh@shawneelink.com -----Original Message----- From: Garnett JJoe Zsedeny <jzsed@slic.com> To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Saturday, June 10, 2000 8:07 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion Re: "Nonprofit USGenWeb Project" >I agree with Teri about the motion problem and would have no >problem if Tim just agreed with the proposed solution. How >about the rest? > >Joe > >Teri Pettit wrote: >> >> At 8:47 AM -0700 6/9/00, Maggie Stewart wrote: >> >Teri, >> > >> > I'll withdraw my motion if you agree to handle the >> >negotiations with Mr. Smoot and USGenNet. I will >> >reserve the right to put the motion back out if those >> >negotiations should fall through. >> >> Maggie, >> >> Thanks, I'll do what I can. (Sorry for the delay in getting back to >> you, but I took yesterday off work to celebrate my birthday, and I do >> all of my email from the office.) I appreciate your giving this a chance. >> >> I would like to be able to tell USGenNet that they can return to >> using the real USGenWeb logo as a link on their index page, providing: >> >> 1. That the large-size logo is not used, only the small or mid-sized >> logos. >> >> 2. That the logo not appear in a position that seems to identify the >> USGenNet's index page as itself being an official page of the USGenWeb >> Project (e.g., it should not be at the top of the page, nor right >> above the list of states.) The placement and/or caption text should >> make it plainly identifiable as a "courtesy link". >> >> 3. That the USGenWeb logo link to either the official USGenWeb home page >> at http://www.usgenweb.org/ , or to one of the official state link >> pages: >> http://www.usgenweb.org/thestates.html >> http://www.usgenweb.org/statelinks.html >> http://www.usgenweb.org/statelinks-table.html >> http://www.usgenweb.org/statelinkstext.html >> >> I don't like their use of the pink and white "peppermint swirl" graphics, >> but we did kind of back Fred and USGenNet into a corner by refusing them >> permission to use the real logo as a link button. Links with no graphics >> look so dull, and I expect it will be much harder to negotiate the >> removal of those or any other substitute graphics if they can't use >> the real logo. >> >> There are so many motions on the table it is getting past confusing. >> Do we have to make a motion to be able to restore permission to use >> the real logos? I don't think I can say so on my own, since Tim already >> sent USGenNet a letter saying that they had to remove them. >> >> -- Teri > >-- >Zsedeny Genealogy - http://www.rootsweb.com/~jzed/home.htm >NDGenWeb Archives - >http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgenweb/nd/ndfiles.htm >Pembina County, ND - >http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndpembin/pembina.htm >Ramsey County, ND - >http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndramsey/ramsey.htm >