That's what I thought, too. The group that Carol sent were pretty petty and I thought that was what we were refering to in the motion. Pam Joy Fisher wrote: > > I took it to mean the group of 5 from C. Hammett that were designed to use > USGenWeb to beat RootsWeb over the head. > > At 02:48 PM 6/3/00 -0500, you wrote: > >Joe, > >Would you please clarify your motion. Are you moving > >that all grievances submitted to the AB prior to your > >motion are included in this? That is the way I could read it. > >If that is not the case would you consider amending your > >motion to show just which grievances, and which > >submitter, your motion addresses. > >At the moment the motion appears to me to be a little > >too broad in it's scope and could be intrepreted to mean > >that any grievance submitted to this board is frivolous and > >therefore should be dismissed. > >My reasoning for this that there have been quite a few > >grievances submitted. None have been addressed that I'm > >aware of. Each grievance should be addressed seperately > >to determine the merits of each and I am still greatly > >concerned about addressing grievances filed against this > >board or members of it. I see no fair way we can address > >those ourselves. > > > >Thanks, > >Ginger > >gingerh@shawneelink.com > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Betsy Mills <betsym@1starnet.com> > >To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> > >Date: Saturday, June 03, 2000 2:38 PM > >Subject: [BOARD-L] Fwd: Motion 00-14 > > > > > > >Forwarding for Tim Stowell, as requested: > > > > > >>Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 12:33:07 -0700 (PDT) > > >>From: Tim Stowell <usgw1nc@yahoo.com> > > >>Subject: Motion 00-14 > > >> > > >> For background on the motion made by Joe seconded by > > >>Joy: > > >> > > >>"By submitting these grievances to the Board the > > >>"aggrieved" party(s) is/are invoking Section I of > > >>Article XIV which requests the Advisory Board to > > >>advise on issues related to grievances and appeals. My > > >>advice is that the grievances are purely spiteful and > > >>meant to disrupt and cause disarray among the Project > > >>members." > > >> > > >>The motion below is given the number 00-14. The floor > > >>is now open for discussion. > > >> > > >> > > >>"Therefore, I move that the grievances be dismissed as > > >>frivolous and purely political in nature." > > >> > > >>Tim > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >