That's my concern. We don't know. There was also a grievance filed about the Elections at about the same time. Plus there are still a number of grievances from over the past few months. Are we going to discount all these with this vote? Now unless I've misunderstood, Joe explanation said yes. Ginger gingerh@shawneelink.com -----Original Message----- From: Joy Fisher <jfisher@ucla.edu> To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Saturday, June 03, 2000 5:49 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Fwd: Motion 00-14 >I took it to mean the group of 5 from C. Hammett that were designed to use >USGenWeb to beat RootsWeb over the head. > >At 02:48 PM 6/3/00 -0500, you wrote: >>Joe, >>Would you please clarify your motion. Are you moving >>that all grievances submitted to the AB prior to your >>motion are included in this? That is the way I could read it. >>If that is not the case would you consider amending your >>motion to show just which grievances, and which >>submitter, your motion addresses. >>At the moment the motion appears to me to be a little >>too broad in it's scope and could be intrepreted to mean >>that any grievance submitted to this board is frivolous and >>therefore should be dismissed. >>My reasoning for this that there have been quite a few >>grievances submitted. None have been addressed that I'm >>aware of. Each grievance should be addressed seperately >>to determine the merits of each and I am still greatly >>concerned about addressing grievances filed against this >>board or members of it. I see no fair way we can address >>those ourselves. >> >>Thanks, >>Ginger >>gingerh@shawneelink.com >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Betsy Mills <betsym@1starnet.com> >>To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> >>Date: Saturday, June 03, 2000 2:38 PM >>Subject: [BOARD-L] Fwd: Motion 00-14 >> >> >> >Forwarding for Tim Stowell, as requested: >> > >> >>Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2000 12:33:07 -0700 (PDT) >> >>From: Tim Stowell <usgw1nc@yahoo.com> >> >>Subject: Motion 00-14 >> >> >> >> For background on the motion made by Joe seconded by >> >>Joy: >> >> >> >>"By submitting these grievances to the Board the >> >>"aggrieved" party(s) is/are invoking Section I of >> >>Article XIV which requests the Advisory Board to >> >>advise on issues related to grievances and appeals. My >> >>advice is that the grievances are purely spiteful and >> >>meant to disrupt and cause disarray among the Project >> >>members." >> >> >> >>The motion below is given the number 00-14. The floor >> >>is now open for discussion. >> >> >> >> >> >>"Therefore, I move that the grievances be dismissed as >> >>frivolous and purely political in nature." >> >> >> >>Tim >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >