Maggie, If there's any typo's just put it down to blurred vision from the tears in my eyes. The idea of you calling me partisan is too hysterical for words. They say laughter is good for the soul and now mine should be good for next century. But then again, if your definition of partisan means that I'm for an honest election and fair treatment for all members of this project then you bet I'm partisan. I kind of think that's not the definition you had in mind, though. I could be wrong.....but I doubt it. <g> Oh, by the way, would you cite your reference for your declaration please. Ginger gingerh@shawneelink.com -----Original Message----- From: Maggie Stewart <maggieohio@columbus.rr.com> To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Monday, June 05, 2000 7:39 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Election.. April 1, 2000, cut-off date >Ginger, > >Your motion is improper and out of order, the Election Committee's >decision is binding on the Advisory Board. If you must act in such a >partisan manner do so thusly > >I move to rescind the 60 date cutoff and bestow all eligible members with >the *right* to vote. > >Maggie > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: Ginger <gingerh@shawneelink.com> >To: <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> >Sent: Monday, June 05, 2000 6:44 AM >Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Election.. April 1, 2000, cut-off date >I move that the April 1, 2000 cut off date for voter >eligibility be declared contrary to the Bylaws of the >USGenWeb Project and that this Board instruct >the Elections Committee that all members of the >USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance >with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb >Project. > >My personal note and not part of the motion itself: >To do anything less smacks of attempted manipulation >of the Election by this Board and the Election committee. > > >Ginger >gingerh@shawneelink.com > >-----Original Message----- >From: Jim Powell Jr <jpowelljr@gru.net> >To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> >Date: Sunday, June 04, 2000 9:55 PM >Subject: [BOARD-L] Election.. April 1, 2000, cut-off date > > >>As I am hopefully running for office, I don't believe that I should be >>dealing with this. Will someone else bring it up and discuss it. When >>I was Chairman of the EC most such changes were run by the board. Will >>you please look at? There are 2 grievances about this at this time. I >>am not asking you to give the EC a hard time. I know how hard, and most >>of the time thankless, that their job can be. >> >>Thanks, >>Jim >> > > >