At 02:33 AM 10/13/00 -0400, you wrote: >At 01:19 AM 10/13/00 -0500, you wrote: >>Tim I would like answers to my questions before voting on this motion. >>Richard... >> >>Tim Stowell wrote: >>> >>> Please cast your vote on Motion 00-32, made by Ken, seconded by Maggie, >>> stated below: >>> >>> I move that "the Board direct the NC to apply for the Service Mark "The >>> USGenWeb Project" as soon as possible." >> >>-- >> Richard M. Howland IlGenWeb State Coordinator > >Richard, > >Are you refering to this note from you? > >Date: Fri, 06 Oct 2000 22:12:53 -0500 >From: ILGenWeb State Coordinator <richpump@wf.net> >Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] >To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com > Ken may I inquire where the NC is supposed to get the money for this filing? What address is to be used? From what I have been reading. We would only be filing for "USGenWeb"? Maybe we would be better off applying for "WasUSGenWeb"? Richard... >----------- Breaking down into a numbered format Richard's questions are: 1. Where the NC is supposed to get the money for this filing? A. If need be, ie to get the ball rolling, I can supply the filing fee, for now, but would hope to be partially refunded by the other members of the Project. 2. What address is to be used? A. That would be for the AB to decide. 3. We would only be filing for "USGenWeb"? A. I believe so, based on what I saw in some earlier notes from one or two persons here. 4. Maybe we would be better off applying for "WasUSGenWeb"? A. --- The above answers are mine, and mine only. Others will I'm sure have different answers. Lastly though - perhaps in addition to Richard's concerns - there has been talk on the some of the lists about this and why the membership at large is not being asked to vote on this. I pass this along to address the concerns of those who have expressed these reservations. Tim