In my opinion we should file for "USGenWeb" which would serve as the umbrella under which all subsequent deriviative marks could be assigned. Joe Richard Harrison wrote: > > Pam Reid wrote: > > > > > I think that we should apply for the Service Mark "USGenWeb" rather than > > "The USGenWeb Project" for the reasons that others have already stated > > so well. Acquiring the rights to "USGenWeb" would hopefully prevent > > others from using "USGenWeb" in any part of another application (ex. > > "The USGenWeb Comic Book Pages"). > > > > Pam > > How do others feel about this? I would certainly be willing to revise my motion if > there is a consensus. > -Isaiah > > -- > Richard Harrison/Encinitas, San Diego, California > USGenWeb Northwest/Plains County Coordinator Rep > IAGenWeb Immediate Past State Coordinator > Jones Co. IAGenWeb Coord.: http://www.rootsweb.com/~iajones/index.htm > Jones Co. List Owner: IAJONES-L@rootsweb.com > IOWA-L List Owner: IOWA-L@rootsweb.com > Richard's Genealogy: http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~richard -- Zsedeny Genealogy - http://www.rootsweb.com/~jzed/home.htm NDGenWeb Archives - http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgenweb/nd/ndfiles.htm Pembina County, ND - http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndpembin/pembina.htm Ramsey County, ND - http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndramsey/ramsey.htm