I must have missed something. I didn't hear this argument when a trademark committee was formed. Joe kshort wrote: > > At 10:58 AM 10/13/00 -0400, you wrote: > >Ken, > > > >What alternative suggestions do you think should be instituted? > > > >Maggie > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: kshort <kshort@kroo.com> > >To: <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> > >Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2000 12:37 AM > >Subject: [BOARD-L] Revised Motion 00-30 - Amendment > > > > > >Why does the chair have to be elected by the AB? Seems to me, we are micro > >managing again. > > > >Ken > > There is not any reason for the Board to be involved in selecting the > committee chair. They are adults and have the knowledge to select their > own chair and should be allowed to do so. > > None of us will be on this committee, so why should we force them to accept > who we think should be chair? > > One of the biggest problems we have is the AB trying to micro manage > things. We should not be doing that. Once a committee is picked, they are > given their guidelines and are turned loose to do the job they were > selected for. We should only get involved by answering > questions, clarifying something that might come up and/or replacing > someone who for what ever reason has to resign. > > Have we gotten so arrogant we think we have all the answers. I sure hope not. > > Ken -- Zsedeny Genealogy - http://www.rootsweb.com/~jzed/home.htm NDGenWeb Archives - http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgenweb/nd/ndfiles.htm Pembina County, ND - http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndpembin/pembina.htm Ramsey County, ND - http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndramsey/ramsey.htm