continue with the motion - Sturgis 17. "...relate to the members and to the organization." David Samuelsen On 6/18/2010 11:39 PM, Sherri wrote: > David, the difference between this motion and both the Guidelines Document > and the Grievance Procedures updates motions were both items on the agenda. > They'd waited their turn and made it to the top of the list. Discussion had > been held on both, so no explanation of what the intent was and no personal > opinion had a need to be in either of the motions. Not so with this one, on > either count. The grievance procedures updates were postponed because there > was a time line that we were working under to name the NWPL SC > representative replacement, the permanent board secretary had resigned and > we needed to name a new one and the guidelines document approval needed to > be vetted against the election committee procedures to ensure that the EC > procedures aligned with the guidelines document. > > As for the guidelines document discussion, that discussion was postponed > with motion 2009/10-29. > > Quite honestly, I should have declared the motion out of order because it > did not go through the process of being placed on the agenda and waiting its > turn to get addressed. I did not because I didn't want to deal with the > accusations that I was not recognizing it because I wanted to be sure to > control the meeting by ensuring that the hearing didn't get postponed. > > It's up to you - the motion can stand as is (which is correctly presented) > or it can be declared out of order and the item be put on the agenda and it > waits its turn. > > Sherri > > -----Original Message----- > From: W David Samuelsen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 11:53 PM > To: Sherri > Cc: [email protected]; 'Sherri'; 'Cyndie Enfinger'; 'Dale Grimm'; 'DC& > Alice Allen'; 'Pauli Smith'; 'Bill'; 'Colleen Pustola'; 'AnnieG'; 'Les > Shockey'; [email protected]; 'Denise Wells'; 'Larry Flesher'; 'Linda Lewis' > Subject: Re: [BOARD] Motion 2009/10-30 - Suspension of Hearings > > Sherri, > still not satisfied. > > You have NOT asked for consent. You have no problems with other motions > I had. > > David Samuelsen > > > On 6/17/2010 9:10 PM, Sherri wrote: >> David, >> >> The first paragraph in your email was the motion - the action that you >> wanted to occur. The other two paragraphs are your explanation of why you >> think the action should be taken. As others have indicated, motions don't >> include all of the explanation or discussion such as what you've included > in >> the message where you presented the motion. >> >> I've corrected the double pasting of the wording that inadvertently was >> included when I copied and pasted from your message. The >> explanation/discussion that you've included does not belong in the motion. >> >> Discussion continues on the motion. If you have no discussion, please >> indicate so. >> >> >> Sherri Bradley >> National Coordinator >> USGenWeb Project >> Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org >> Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: W David Samuelsen [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Thursday, June 17, 2010 8:31 AM >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: Sherri; Sherri Bradley; Cyndie Enfinger; Dale Grimm; DC& Alice Allen; >> Pauli Smith; Bill; Colleen Pustola; 'AnnieG'; Les Shockey; >> [email protected]; Denise Wells; Larry Flesher; W David Samuelsen; Linda >> Lewis >> Subject: Re: [BOARD] Motion 2009/10-30 - Suspension of Hearings >> >> I withdraw "no discussion" and register my objection. This is not the >> motion I made and seconded by another AB. >> >> You altered the motion too much. >> >> Please restate the motion as written and presented originally which is >> very specific. >> >> I move we suspend all disciplinary hearings effective immediately >> until after the current elections soon to be underway are over. >> >> This is too close to the elections enough for many to denounce the >> hearings as nothing more than political sham to get rid of election >> opponents at earliest possible time. >> >> The attempt at these hearings are now threatening to cause a good >> number of the CCs to leave the Project. >> >> W. David Samuelsen >> SWSC >> >> >> David Samuelsen >> >> On 6/16/2010 10:35 PM, W David Samuelsen wrote: >>> no discussion >>> >>> David Samuelsen >>> >>> On 6/16/2010 10:22 PM, Sherri wrote: >>>> Presented by W. David Samuelsen and seconded by Colleen Pustola and > dated >>>> 6/16/10, the motion reads: "I move we suspend all disciplinary hearings >>>> effective immediately until after the current elections soon to be >> underway >>>> are over. move we suspend all disciplinary hearings effective > immediately >>>> until after the current elections soon to be underway are over." >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Discussion is now open. If you have no discussion, please respond with >> "no >>>> discussion". >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Sherri Bradley >>>> National Coordinator >>>> USGenWeb Project >>>> Information about the USGenWeb Project at<http://usgenweb.org> >>>> http://usgenweb.org >>>> Advisory Board Agenda<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> >>>> http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >>>> ------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in >> the subject and the body of the message >>>> >>>> >>> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in >> the subject and the body of the message >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >