Is there any further discussion on this motion? Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of W David Samuelsen Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 2:16 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BOARD] Motion 2009/10-30 - Suspension of Hearings continue with the motion - Sturgis 17. "...relate to the members and to the organization." David Samuelsen On 6/18/2010 11:39 PM, Sherri wrote: > David, the difference between this motion and both the Guidelines Document > and the Grievance Procedures updates motions were both items on the agenda. > They'd waited their turn and made it to the top of the list. Discussion had > been held on both, so no explanation of what the intent was and no personal > opinion had a need to be in either of the motions. Not so with this one, on > either count. The grievance procedures updates were postponed because there > was a time line that we were working under to name the NWPL SC > representative replacement, the permanent board secretary had resigned and > we needed to name a new one and the guidelines document approval needed to > be vetted against the election committee procedures to ensure that the EC > procedures aligned with the guidelines document. > > As for the guidelines document discussion, that discussion was postponed > with motion 2009/10-29. > > Quite honestly, I should have declared the motion out of order because it > did not go through the process of being placed on the agenda and waiting its > turn to get addressed. I did not because I didn't want to deal with the > accusations that I was not recognizing it because I wanted to be sure to > control the meeting by ensuring that the hearing didn't get postponed. > > It's up to you - the motion can stand as is (which is correctly presented) > or it can be declared out of order and the item be put on the agenda and it > waits its turn. > > Sherri

No Discussion Dale > Is there any further discussion on this motion? > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of W David Samuelsen > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 2:16 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [BOARD] Motion 2009/10-30 - Suspension of Hearings > > continue with the motion - Sturgis 17. "...relate to the members and to > the organization." > > David Samuelsen > > On 6/18/2010 11:39 PM, Sherri wrote: >> David, the difference between this motion and both the Guidelines >> Document >> and the Grievance Procedures updates motions were both items on the > agenda. >> They'd waited their turn and made it to the top of the list. Discussion > had >> been held on both, so no explanation of what the intent was and no > personal >> opinion had a need to be in either of the motions. Not so with this >> one, > on >> either count. The grievance procedures updates were postponed because > there >> was a time line that we were working under to name the NWPL SC >> representative replacement, the permanent board secretary had resigned >> and >> we needed to name a new one and the guidelines document approval needed >> to >> be vetted against the election committee procedures to ensure that the >> EC >> procedures aligned with the guidelines document. >> >> As for the guidelines document discussion, that discussion was postponed >> with motion 2009/10-29. >> >> Quite honestly, I should have declared the motion out of order because >> it >> did not go through the process of being placed on the agenda and waiting > its >> turn to get addressed. I did not because I didn't want to deal with the >> accusations that I was not recognizing it because I wanted to be sure to >> control the meeting by ensuring that the hearing didn't get postponed. >> >> It's up to you - the motion can stand as is (which is correctly >> presented) >> or it can be declared out of order and the item be put on the agenda and > it >> waits its turn. >> >> Sherri > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >