Forwarding as this bounced. Sherri -----Original Message----- From: W David Samuelsen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 2:19 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BOARD] RESULTS: Move to Table Motion 2009/10-23 with number one absolute demand - the NC be BANNED from uttering even a single comment because of one requirement for a Committee member who can be influenced to control the way a grievance case go. and excess insistence on extra confidentiality is backfiring. We saw how much interference and undue influence already been exerted, leading to the outrages. And we already wasted 6 months with this bad motion that got worse each time. This was the intent of tabling the motion so we can move forward to deal with 12 items still in queue, including 3 EC-related matters. David Samuelsen On 4/27/2010 11:54 AM, Sherri wrote: > In the interest of letting everyone see what's been suggested I've put up a > mockup of the changes to the rules. Maybe this will allow us to see more > clearly the suggested changes. The mockup is at > http://kykinfolk.com/temp/amended-standard-rules-4-27.htm - does this help? > > Sherri > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Sherri > Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 6:07 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [BOARD] RESULTS: Move to Table Motion 2009/10-23 > > OK, can we please have those that have issues with this motion speak up with > exactly what you are having issues with and suggest wording changes? > > I've also received a few of comments from others that you may want to > consider since we're reworking this anyway. First, from the Grievance > Committee, the timing for filing a grievance is different for different > situations. The suggestion is to change it to a straight 14 days to file > from the incident occurred or was discovered or someone is terminated from > the Project. (This suggestion is because the stated time frame for filing a > grievance can be subject to interpretation if the person is removed from a > project but is still a member of USGenWeb through another project.) > > Second, a time limit for filing an appeal should be stated. The suggestion > is 10-14 days for that, too (so that we can actually close all of the > loopholes and have complete closure on the issue). A limit to the number of > times an appeal can be filed should also be added. > > Third, and we've all heard this from more than a few members, is the > suggestion that once the grievance process is complete (including the > possibility of filing an appeal), that at least basic information about the > grievance should be released. The suggested info to be made public would be > the names of the parties involved, whatever the reason the grievance was > filed and the resolution of the grievance and any appeals. > > If you don't want to include these things, just let me know and we'll leave > them on the agenda as a separate item. > > So, can you please speak up so that we can keep this moving? > > Thanks, > Sherri > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Sherri > Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:10 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [BOARD] RESULTS: Move to Table Motion 2009/10-23 > > With 12 members voting, the motion to table motion 2009/10-23 fails. > > Those voting to table the motion: Alice Allen, Colleen Pustola, Linda Lewis > and W. David Samuelsen > > Those voting against tabling the motion: Ann Allen Geoghegan, Dale Grimm, > Denise Wells, Jeff Kemp, Larry Flesher, Les Shockey, Pauli Smith and Tina > Vickery > > Those not voting: Cyndie Enfinger > > Discussion will continue on motion 2009/10-23. > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Sherri > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:35 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [BOARD] Move to Table Motion 2009/10-23 > > A motion to table motion 2009/10-23 has been made by David Samuelsen and > seconded by Alice Allen. > > > > Those in favor of tabling motion 2009/10-23 temporarily, please respond with > "agree". Those opposed, please respond with "disagree". > > > > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at<http://usgenweb.org> > http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> > http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >