For goodness sake, David, why does everything have to be such a fiasco? Can't you just ask a darn question instead of deciding everything is a conspiracy? Denise Wells On Apr 24, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Sherri <[email protected]> wrote: > David, > > If you check the archives, the AB went into executive session to > deal with > the resolution of a grievance. That issue has not been completed at > this > point, so yes, the executive session continues and is not being used > as a > "blanket" (although I'm not sure what you're trying to convey with > this > word). > > The announcement of going into executive session has been done like > this in > the past with no objections, so it does follow past precedent. If > the rest > of you want me to change the way that executive sessions are > handled, by all > means, please let me know and I will be glad to do so. > > The opening of the NWPL SC representative position on the AB > occurred after > that session began, and we are required name a replacement within a > certain > time period per the bylaws. Since we're 7 days away from the end of > that > time frame, this is something that must be dealt with and putting it > in line > behind two or three other things is not going to work and still > allow us to > meet the time frame. > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: W David Samuelsen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:11 PM > To: [email protected]; Sherri; Tina Vickery; Cyndie Enfinger; Dale > Grimm; > DC & Alice Allen; Pauli Smith; Colleen Pustola; [email protected]; > Les > Shockley; Jeff Kemp; Denise Wells; Larry Flesher; > [email protected]; Linda > Lewis > Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" > > Point of Order > > Sturgis page 108-109 > Motion must be made and seconded, is priviledged, not debatable or > amendable, adopted by majority vote to go into closed session. Each > time > there is a issue. It can not be used as a blanket. > > David Samuelsen > > On 4/24/2010 7:14 AM, Sherri wrote: >> It seems that things just keep rolling in one after the other. > >> For the record, the Advisory Board is continuing in executive >> session, the >> new issue that we're dealing with is the appointment of a NWPL SC >> representative. > >> Sherri Bradley >> National Coordinator >> USGenWeb Project >> Information about the USGenWeb Project at<http://usgenweb.org> >> http://usgenweb.org >> Advisory Board Agenda<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> >> http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message

I'm following what the Sturgis says when it comes to the motions. David On 4/24/2010 11:51 AM, Denise Wells wrote: > For goodness sake, David, why does everything have to be such a > fiasco? Can't you just ask a darn question instead of deciding > everything is a conspiracy? > > Denise Wells