I made the call on this question to finally vote on this motion. "Two days of discussion is not enough time to discuss" being the reason by some of you voting 'disagree' to the call. This motion in one rendition or another has been presented and discussed since January 25, 2010, with each time being disrupted as it has been again this time with no solutions, just rhetoric. As we discuss this time, (as it appears the call will fail), those of you that are calling for changes, suggest wording for those changes, state your reasons why you feel they are necessary and please don't call the intentions and good work of you fellow Project members into question as we work to finalize this motion. Tina