Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Home

Results for list 'board'

Total: 3/3
    1. [BOARD] Re-laying the Motion to lay the table 2009/10-23
    2. W David Samuelsen

    3. At request of the NC: I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. Sturgis page 68-69. W. David Samuelsen

    04/24/2010 05:01:43
    1. Re: [BOARD] Re-laying the Motion to lay the table 2009/10-23
    2. Tina S. Vickery

    3. David, do you have a defintion of temporarily, prior to this being seconded. Temporarily is pretty ambiguous. Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: "W David Samuelsen" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; "Linda Lewis" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Larry Flesher" <[email protected]>; "Les Shockley" <[email protected]>; "Jeff Kemp" <[email protected]>; "Denise Wells" <[email protected]>; "Colleen Pustola" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Dale Grimm" <[email protected]>; "DC & Alice Allen" <[email protected]>; "Pauli Smith" <[email protected]>; "Cyndie Enfinger" <[email protected]>; "Tina Vickery" <[email protected]>; "Sherri" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:01 PM Subject: Re-laying the Motion to lay the table 2009/10-23 > At request of the NC: > > I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. > > The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. > > Sturgis page 68-69. > > W. David Samuelsen >

    04/24/2010 09:26:03
    1. Re: [BOARD] Re-laying the Motion to lay the table 2009/10-23
    2. W David Samuelsen

    3. Page 68-71 Sturgis It is not ambiguous. The explanation is very defined. There are two different types of tabling motions. The one I am using: 1.Requires a second 2.is not debatable 3.cannot be amended 4.requires majority vote 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions 6.applies to main motions only 7.can have no motion applied to it except the motion to withdraw "To stop debate on the main motion and remove it, with amendments and adhering motions, from consideration of the assembly during the current meeting or convention unless the posposted motion is brought back before the assembly by a motion to resume consideration or to take from the table." Again, not ambigious, it is a very specifici motion. The other one requires specific date, which the current assembly can not act upon until that specific date. David On 4/24/2010 1:26 PM, Tina S. Vickery wrote: > David, do you have a defintion of temporarily, prior to this being seconded. > Temporarily is pretty ambiguous. > > Tina > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "W David Samuelsen"<[email protected]> > To:<[email protected]>; "Linda Lewis"<[email protected]>; > <[email protected]>; "Larry Flesher"<[email protected]>; "Les Shockley" > <[email protected]>; "Jeff Kemp"<[email protected]>; "Denise > Wells"<[email protected]>; "Colleen Pustola"<[email protected]>; > <[email protected]>; "Dale Grimm"<[email protected]>; "DC& Alice Allen" > <[email protected]>; "Pauli Smith"<[email protected]>; "Cyndie > Enfinger"<[email protected]>; "Tina Vickery"<[email protected]>; > "Sherri"<[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:01 PM > Subject: Re-laying the Motion to lay the table 2009/10-23 > > >> At request of the NC: >> >> I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. >> >> The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. >> >> Sturgis page 68-69. >> >> W. David Samuelsen

    04/24/2010 08:18:24