Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Home

Results for list 'board'

Total: 3/3
    1. Re: [BOARD] In response to David Samuelsen -
    2. W David Samuelsen

    3. This has nothing to do with Point of Order. It is completely separate. Quoting from Sturgis page 71 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions. You ignored the second. David On 4/24/2010 1:39 PM, Sherri wrote: > I don't see that I mentioned it being specific to your Point of Order, > except to the extent that I responded to your message with that subject. I > will apologize for that oversight on my part. > > The tabling motion is here: > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2010-04/1272128138 > There has not been a second to the motion. I would request that a time > frame is specifically stated, otherwise, per Sturgis, no additional debate > could occur when the issue is revisited. > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of W David Samuelsen > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 3:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" > > How interesting..... > > Where did I say anything about resign or be removed in this point of order? > > Much less where is the tabling motion which was sent to the board at > your request which was very plain and simple? > > David Samuelsen > > On 4/24/2010 12:33 PM, Sherri wrote: >> That may well be, David, but why bring it up in such an antagonistic way > now >> because everyone's not agreeing with your point of view? As pointed out >> before, it appears that you're doing nothing except to try to force your > own >> agenda onto this AB, including trying to force certain members to either >> resign or to be removed. >> >> Sherri >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of W David Samuelsen >> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:17 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" >> >> I'm following what the Sturgis says when it comes to the motions. >> >> David >> >> On 4/24/2010 11:51 AM, Denise Wells wrote: >>> For goodness sake, David, why does everything have to be such a >>> fiasco? Can't you just ask a darn question instead of deciding >>> everything is a conspiracy? >>> >>> Denise Wells >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in >> the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message >> >> > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

    04/24/2010 08:23:53
    1. Re: [BOARD] In response to David Samuelsen -
    2. Lesley Shockey

    3. David I have seen no second since you made the proper motion four and one half hours ago. If one was made, I did not receive it. Les W David Samuelsen wrote: > This has nothing to do with Point of Order. It is completely separate. > > Quoting from Sturgis page 71 > 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions. You ignored the second. > > David > > On 4/24/2010 1:39 PM, Sherri wrote: >> I don't see that I mentioned it being specific to your Point of Order, >> except to the extent that I responded to your message with that subject. I >> will apologize for that oversight on my part. >> >> The tabling motion is here: >> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2010-04/1272128138 >> There has not been a second to the motion. I would request that a time >> frame is specifically stated, otherwise, per Sturgis, no additional debate >> could occur when the issue is revisited. >> >> >> Sherri Bradley >> National Coordinator >> USGenWeb Project >> Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org >> Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of W David Samuelsen >> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 3:01 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" >> >> How interesting..... >> >> Where did I say anything about resign or be removed in this point of order? >> >> Much less where is the tabling motion which was sent to the board at >> your request which was very plain and simple? >> >> David Samuelsen >> >> On 4/24/2010 12:33 PM, Sherri wrote: >>> That may well be, David, but why bring it up in such an antagonistic way >> now >>> because everyone's not agreeing with your point of view? As pointed out >>> before, it appears that you're doing nothing except to try to force your >> own >>> agenda onto this AB, including trying to force certain members to either >>> resign or to be removed. >>> >>> Sherri >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >>> Behalf Of W David Samuelsen >>> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:17 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" >>> >>> I'm following what the Sturgis says when it comes to the motions. >>> >>> David >>> >>> On 4/24/2010 11:51 AM, Denise Wells wrote: >>>> For goodness sake, David, why does everything have to be such a >>>> fiasco? Can't you just ask a darn question instead of deciding >>>> everything is a conspiracy? >>>> >>>> Denise Wells >>> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >>> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in >>> the subject and the body of the message >>> >>> >>> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >>> ------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in >> the subject and the body of the message >>> >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in >> the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    04/24/2010 11:30:30
    1. Re: [BOARD] In response to David Samuelsen -
    2. Sherri

    3. David, The second was made prior to the motion being recognized, and more importantly, while another motion was already on the floor. As previously stated, the AB has always operated by only allowing one motion to be on the floor at a time. The call to question was already on the floor, and, even though it was already dead by having more than 1/3 of the board voting to disagree with the motion, it still had to be completed before moving on. Since you restated the motion, as I requested, we need a second on it and then we'll vote and move on to other things, hopefully. <sigh> We've got a lot that's on our agenda and we've not made much progress since January. It's a shame since we started out so well. Hopefully, we can get back to work and make a dent in the agenda items to get some of them completed. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of W David Samuelsen Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 4:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BOARD] In response to David Samuelsen - This has nothing to do with Point of Order. It is completely separate. Quoting from Sturgis page 71 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions. You ignored the second. David On 4/24/2010 1:39 PM, Sherri wrote: > I don't see that I mentioned it being specific to your Point of Order, > except to the extent that I responded to your message with that subject. I > will apologize for that oversight on my part. > > The tabling motion is here: > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2010-04/1272128138 > There has not been a second to the motion. I would request that a time > frame is specifically stated, otherwise, per Sturgis, no additional debate > could occur when the issue is revisited. > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of W David Samuelsen > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 3:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" > > How interesting..... > > Where did I say anything about resign or be removed in this point of order? > > Much less where is the tabling motion which was sent to the board at > your request which was very plain and simple? > > David Samuelsen > > On 4/24/2010 12:33 PM, Sherri wrote: >> That may well be, David, but why bring it up in such an antagonistic way > now >> because everyone's not agreeing with your point of view? As pointed out >> before, it appears that you're doing nothing except to try to force your > own >> agenda onto this AB, including trying to force certain members to either >> resign or to be removed. >> >> Sherri >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of W David Samuelsen >> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:17 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" >> >> I'm following what the Sturgis says when it comes to the motions. >> >> David >> >> On 4/24/2010 11:51 AM, Denise Wells wrote: >>> For goodness sake, David, why does everything have to be such a >>> fiasco? Can't you just ask a darn question instead of deciding >>> everything is a conspiracy? >>> >>> Denise Wells >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in >> the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message >> >> > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    04/24/2010 12:12:22