I would like to see all of it done at once. And we need to get on with it so we can move to the EC item on the agenda - there is an election very soon. AnnieG On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Sherri <[email protected]> wrote: > OK, can we please have those that have issues with this motion speak up > with > exactly what you are having issues with and suggest wording changes? > > I've also received a few of comments from others that you may want to > consider since we're reworking this anyway. First, from the Grievance > Committee, the timing for filing a grievance is different for different > situations. The suggestion is to change it to a straight 14 days to file > from the incident occurred or was discovered or someone is terminated from > the Project. (This suggestion is because the stated time frame for filing > a > grievance can be subject to interpretation if the person is removed from a > project but is still a member of USGenWeb through another project.) > > Second, a time limit for filing an appeal should be stated. The suggestion > is 10-14 days for that, too (so that we can actually close all of the > loopholes and have complete closure on the issue). A limit to the number > of > times an appeal can be filed should also be added. > > Third, and we've all heard this from more than a few members, is the > suggestion that once the grievance process is complete (including the > possibility of filing an appeal), that at least basic information about the > grievance should be released. The suggested info to be made public would > be > the names of the parties involved, whatever the reason the grievance was > filed and the resolution of the grievance and any appeals. > > If you don't want to include these things, just let me know and we'll leave > them on the agenda as a separate item. > > So, can you please speak up so that we can keep this moving? > > Thanks, > Sherri > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Sherri > Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:10 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [BOARD] RESULTS: Move to Table Motion 2009/10-23 > > With 12 members voting, the motion to table motion 2009/10-23 fails. > > Those voting to table the motion: Alice Allen, Colleen Pustola, Linda Lewis > and W. David Samuelsen > > Those voting against tabling the motion: Ann Allen Geoghegan, Dale Grimm, > Denise Wells, Jeff Kemp, Larry Flesher, Les Shockey, Pauli Smith and Tina > Vickery > > Those not voting: Cyndie Enfinger > > Discussion will continue on motion 2009/10-23. > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Sherri > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:35 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [BOARD] Move to Table Motion 2009/10-23 > > A motion to table motion 2009/10-23 has been made by David Samuelsen and > seconded by Alice Allen. > > > > Those in favor of tabling motion 2009/10-23 temporarily, please respond > with > "agree". Those opposed, please respond with "disagree". > > > > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at <http://usgenweb.org> > http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda <http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> > http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in the subject and the body of the message >

My biggest reason to vote for tabling this for now is exactly what Annie brings up--the EC item on the agenda. The GC item is complicated, we've been dealing with it for a long time in one way or another. I think we need to put it aside to work on more pressing things. While this is *pressing* in its own right, I can see us still dealing with it right up to election time with no movement on the EC stuff. Alice *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 4/27/2010 at 6:44 AM [email protected] wrote: >I would like to see all of it done at once. And we need to get on with it >so we can move to the EC item on the agenda - there is an election very >soon. > >AnnieG > >On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:07 AM, Sherri <[email protected]> wrote: > >> OK, can we please have those that have issues with this motion speak up >> with >> exactly what you are having issues with and suggest wording changes? >> >> I've also received a few of comments from others that you may want to >> consider since we're reworking this anyway. First, from the Grievance >> Committee, the timing for filing a grievance is different for different >> situations. The suggestion is to change it to a straight 14 days to file >> from the incident occurred or was discovered or someone is terminated >from >> the Project. (This suggestion is because the stated time frame for >filing >> a >> grievance can be subject to interpretation if the person is removed from >a >> project but is still a member of USGenWeb through another project.) >> >> Second, a time limit for filing an appeal should be stated. The >suggestion >> is 10-14 days for that, too (so that we can actually close all of the >> loopholes and have complete closure on the issue). A limit to the number >> of >> times an appeal can be filed should also be added. >> >> Third, and we've all heard this from more than a few members, is the >> suggestion that once the grievance process is complete (including the >> possibility of filing an appeal), that at least basic information about >the >> grievance should be released. The suggested info to be made public would >> be >> the names of the parties involved, whatever the reason the grievance was >> filed and the resolution of the grievance and any appeals. >> >> If you don't want to include these things, just let me know and we'll >leave >> them on the agenda as a separate item. >> >> So, can you please speak up so that we can keep this moving? >> >> Thanks, >> Sherri >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Sherri >> Sent: Sunday, April 25, 2010 10:10 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BOARD] RESULTS: Move to Table Motion 2009/10-23 >> >> With 12 members voting, the motion to table motion 2009/10-23 fails. >> >> Those voting to table the motion: Alice Allen, Colleen Pustola, Linda >Lewis >> and W. David Samuelsen >> >> Those voting against tabling the motion: Ann Allen Geoghegan, Dale Grimm, >> Denise Wells, Jeff Kemp, Larry Flesher, Les Shockey, Pauli Smith and Tina >> Vickery >> >> Those not voting: Cyndie Enfinger >> >> Discussion will continue on motion 2009/10-23. >> >> >> Sherri Bradley >> National Coordinator >> USGenWeb Project >> Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org >> Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Sherri >> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:35 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: [BOARD] Move to Table Motion 2009/10-23 >> >> A motion to table motion 2009/10-23 has been made by David Samuelsen and >> seconded by Alice Allen. >> >> >> >> Those in favor of tabling motion 2009/10-23 temporarily, please respond >> with >> "agree". Those opposed, please respond with "disagree". >> >> >> >> >> >> Sherri Bradley >> National Coordinator >> USGenWeb Project >> Information about the USGenWeb Project at <http://usgenweb.org> >> http://usgenweb.org >> Advisory Board Agenda <http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> >> http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php >> >> >> >> >> >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in >> the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in >> the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message >> >USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >[email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >in the subject and the body of the message