I find the motion in the Archives, although I still cannot find it in my Board folder. Because I don't have the original email to reply to, I will go ahead and second this motion from this one. Alice Allen NENC CC Rep *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 4/24/2010 at 5:30 PM [email protected] wrote: >David I have seen no second since you made the proper motion four and >one half hours ago. If one was made, I did not receive it. > >Les > >W David Samuelsen wrote: >> This has nothing to do with Point of Order. It is completely separate. >> >> Quoting from Sturgis page 71 >> 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions. You ignored the >second. >> >> David >> >> On 4/24/2010 1:39 PM, Sherri wrote: >>> I don't see that I mentioned it being specific to your Point of Order, >>> except to the extent that I responded to your message with that >subject. I >>> will apologize for that oversight on my part. >>> >>> The tabling motion is here: >>> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2010-04/1272128138 >>> There has not been a second to the motion. I would request that a time >>> frame is specifically stated, otherwise, per Sturgis, no additional >debate >>> could occur when the issue is revisited. >>> >>> >>> Sherri Bradley >>> National Coordinator >>> USGenWeb Project >>> Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org >>> Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php >>>