I'm not sure I've seen the motion. My Board mail sorts into a specific folder, and I haven't seen anything in this folder that indicates this motion. I will check the Archives though, maybe my ISP is being persnickety today. Alice NENC CC Rep *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 4/24/2010 at 5:30 PM [email protected] wrote: >David I have seen no second since you made the proper motion four and >one half hours ago. If one was made, I did not receive it. > >Les > >W David Samuelsen wrote: >> This has nothing to do with Point of Order. It is completely separate. >> >> Quoting from Sturgis page 71 >> 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions. You ignored the >second. >> >> David >> >> On 4/24/2010 1:39 PM, Sherri wrote: >>> I don't see that I mentioned it being specific to your Point of Order, >>> except to the extent that I responded to your message with that >subject. I >>> will apologize for that oversight on my part. >>> >>> The tabling motion is here: >>> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2010-04/1272128138 >>> There has not been a second to the motion. I would request that a time >>> frame is specifically stated, otherwise, per Sturgis, no additional >debate >>> could occur when the issue is revisited. >>> >>> >>> Sherri Bradley >>> National Coordinator >>> USGenWeb Project >>> Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org >>> Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php
Alice, The motion was restated here after the other motion was formally recognized as being failed http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2010-04/1272128138. There has been no second. Sherri -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DC & Alice Allen Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:05 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [BOARD] In response to David Samuelsen - I'm not sure I've seen the motion. My Board mail sorts into a specific folder, and I haven't seen anything in this folder that indicates this motion. I will check the Archives though, maybe my ISP is being persnickety today. Alice NENC CC Rep *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 4/24/2010 at 5:30 PM [email protected] wrote: >David I have seen no second since you made the proper motion four and >one half hours ago. If one was made, I did not receive it. > >Les > >W David Samuelsen wrote: >> This has nothing to do with Point of Order. It is completely separate. >> >> Quoting from Sturgis page 71 >> 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions. You ignored the >second. >> >> David >> >> On 4/24/2010 1:39 PM, Sherri wrote: >>> I don't see that I mentioned it being specific to your Point of Order, >>> except to the extent that I responded to your message with that >subject. I >>> will apologize for that oversight on my part. >>> >>> The tabling motion is here: >>> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2010-04/1272128138 >>> There has not been a second to the motion. I would request that a time >>> frame is specifically stated, otherwise, per Sturgis, no additional >debate >>> could occur when the issue is revisited. >>> >>> >>> Sherri Bradley >>> National Coordinator >>> USGenWeb Project >>> Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org >>> Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message