RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 6720/9051
    1. [BOARD-L] End of Business
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. I'm asking for a Motion to Adjourn this meeting of the USGenWeb Advisory Board for the 1998-99 term effective 11:59 PM EST, 8/31/99. Do I hear such a motion? Tim

    08/30/1999 10:26:34
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Trey Holt
    3. At 01:22 AM 8/30/99 -0400, you wrote: >Motion 99-22 passes with: 13 ayes, 0 nays, 2 not voting. > > > I got back early so just for the record I vote aye on motion 99-22 Thanks Trey Holt

    08/30/1999 10:07:32
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Aye. Pam Reid Tim Stowell wrote: > Hearing no discussion on the Motion by Trey, now numbered 99-22, please > vote on said motion by sending in either an affirmative, negative or an > abstention notice. > > Thanks, > > Tim > > At 09:46 PM 8/24/99 -0400, Tim Stowell wrote: > >Is there any discussion on Trey's motion, seconded by Bill and Joe? > > > >The motion: to thank the committee and accept the results. > > > > > > > >

    08/30/1999 12:35:02
    1. [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. Motion 99-22 passes with: 13 ayes, 0 nays, 2 not voting.

    08/29/1999 11:22:30
    1. [BOARD-L] [ELECTIONS] Your Request has been denied
    2. jpowelljr
    3. Mr. Smoot... Your request has been denied. It is the consensus of the Committee that we do not have the power to do so. We suggest you make your request of the Board. Please refer any future requests directly to the Board. The Election Committee will await further direction from the Board. Sincerely, The Election Committee CC Election Committee Board-L

    08/29/1999 07:02:34
    1. [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Lynn
    3. Aye to Motion 99-22 Lynn

    08/29/1999 03:43:25
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Aye. Ginger Cisewski NW-Plains CC Rep

    08/29/1999 11:47:40
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Bill Oliver
    3. Tim Stowell wrote: > Hearing no discussion on the Motion by Trey, now numbered 99-22, please > vote on said motion by sending in either an affirmative, negative or an > abstention notice. > > Thanks, > > Tim > > At 09:46 PM 8/24/99 -0400, Tim Stowell wrote: > >Is there any discussion on Trey's motion, seconded by Bill and Joe? > > > >The motion: to thank the committee and accept the results. > > > > > > > > Aye to motion 99-22. Bill --

    08/29/1999 10:58:37
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Yvonne James-Henderson
    3. Aye

    08/29/1999 06:42:17
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Bonnie McVicar-Briggs
    3. At 11:51 PM 8/27/1999 -0400, you wrote: > >Hearing no discussion on the Motion by Trey, now numbered 99-22, please >vote on said motion by sending in either an affirmative, negative or an >abstention notice. > >Thanks, > >Tim > >At 09:46 PM 8/24/99 -0400, Tim Stowell wrote: >>Is there any discussion on Trey's motion, seconded by Bill and Joe? >> >>The motion: to thank the committee and accept the results. >> Aye Bonnie McVicar-Briggs mishiawa@shiatel.tds.net USGENWEB PROJECT Volunteer Shiawassee County, MI http://www2.crosswinds.net/~shiawassee/mishiawa.html Clinton County, MI http://www.rootsweb.com/~miclinto/clintmn.htm

    08/29/1999 01:07:57
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Betsy Mills
    3. Aye! Betsy At 11:51 PM 08/27/1999 -0400, you wrote: > >Hearing no discussion on the Motion by Trey, now numbered 99-22, please >vote on said motion by sending in either an affirmative, negative or an >abstention notice. > >Thanks, > >Tim > >At 09:46 PM 8/24/99 -0400, Tim Stowell wrote: >>Is there any discussion on Trey's motion, seconded by Bill and Joe? >> >>The motion: to thank the committee and accept the results. >> >> >> >> >

    08/28/1999 07:01:31
    1. [BOARD-L] Vote 99-22
    2. Beth Wills
    3. Aye Beth Wills bethw@kvi.net

    08/28/1999 04:17:54
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Bridgett Smith
    3. Aye Bridgett Smith SC Rep SE/Mid-Atlantic Region bascs@wizard.com *~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~* TNGenWeb State Coordinator http://www.tngenweb.org/

    08/28/1999 10:00:26
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. jpowelljr
    3. What is the status of those of us on the Election Committee? I would initially assume we should abstain, but we can vouch for the results and thus should vote "AYE". I have a little problem with the part of saying thanks to ourselves. So I vote "Aye" with an additional "thanks" to the Board for allowing us to accept the challenge in the first place. If anyone believes my vote to be improper please state your reason. I'll either address the potential problem or change my vote to abstain. Sincerely, Jim Tim Stowell wrote: > > Hearing no discussion on the Motion by Trey, now numbered 99-22, please > vote on said motion by sending in either an affirmative, negative or an > abstention notice. > > Thanks, > > Tim > > At 09:46 PM 8/24/99 -0400, Tim Stowell wrote: > >Is there any discussion on Trey's motion, seconded by Bill and Joe? > > > >The motion: to thank the committee and accept the results.

    08/28/1999 08:27:03
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Ms. Piglet
    3. Aye. Megan "Piglet" Zurawicz piglet@rootsweb.com RootsWeb Community Mentor and general dogsbody http://communities.rootsweb.com

    08/28/1999 08:03:34
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. In a message dated 8/27/99 11:45:57 PM Eastern Daylight Time, tstowell@chattanooga.net writes: << Hearing no discussion on the Motion by Trey, now numbered 99-22, please vote on said motion by sending in either an affirmative, negative or an abstention notice. >> Dear Board: This might well be my last vote on this AB, well maybe not. I guess I could run again and might get elected. <g> I, David C. Young, vote in the Affirmative (YES)

    08/28/1999 01:01:11
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Garnett Zsedeny
    3. Aye! Joe Tim Stowell wrote: > Hearing no discussion on the Motion by Trey, now numbered 99-22, please > vote on said motion by sending in either an affirmative, negative or an > abstention notice. > > Thanks, > > Tim > > At 09:46 PM 8/24/99 -0400, Tim Stowell wrote: > >Is there any discussion on Trey's motion, seconded by Bill and Joe? > > > >The motion: to thank the committee and accept the results. > > > > > > > > -- email:jzsed@slic.com http://www.rootsweb.com/~jzed/home.htm http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndpembin/pembina.htm http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndramsey/ramsey.htm

    08/27/1999 09:53:45
    1. [BOARD-L] Motion 99-22
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. Hearing no discussion on the Motion by Trey, now numbered 99-22, please vote on said motion by sending in either an affirmative, negative or an abstention notice. Thanks, Tim At 09:46 PM 8/24/99 -0400, Tim Stowell wrote: >Is there any discussion on Trey's motion, seconded by Bill and Joe? > >The motion: to thank the committee and accept the results. > > > >

    08/27/1999 09:51:47
    1. [BOARD-L] I am on vacation this week.
    2. Dear Board Members: I am on vacation this week. So I am behind on my reading of my e-mails. As I do still have two more days, I return home to find over 200 e-mails on this address and I have three other e-mail address still to check. I will do my best to read all your stands on the issues. And if there is a vote on the floor will make my vote before my term ends in a few days. I have read quickly 50 of the messages and I have only 150 more to go. My Betty, wife, & I just back from PEI & NS, Canada, we had a great time and even got a little genealogical research done. Enjoy, David C. Young

    08/27/1999 04:09:51
    1. [BOARD-L] Re: Fwd: Re: Inappropriate Behavior
    2. Yvonne James-Henderson
    3. Ms. Hammett, I have no direct financial interest in Rootsweb. I have no idea where and why that was untruth was started. As far as I know, there is no position of the Advisory Board on "anti-RW" or "anti-USGWP". You wrote: 4. It has been suggested publicly, but neither admitted, nor disclaimed, that Ms. James Henderson may have some kind of direct financial interest in Rootsweb.com, Inc., whether as an employee, contractor, shareholder or holder of stock options. As a result, I am also requesting that Ms. James Henderson so advise me since her acting as my representative in this matter would be inappropriate and a possible conflict of interest given the fact that Ms. Brausch's statements included the subject of Rootsweb (reference to me as "anti-RW"). The same request applies to any other representatives of this email. Live Well-Laugh Often-Love Much Yvonne in Burke, VA

    08/27/1999 08:02:30