RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 6420/9051
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-29 Voting
    2. Maggie Stewart
    3. Yes Maggie Stewart ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Stowell <tstowell@chattanooga.net> To: <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, December 12, 1999 1:29 PM Subject: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-29 Voting Please cast your vote on Motion 99-29 - to restore USGenWeb-ALL-L to Volunteer's Info page - by saying your equivalent of yes, no or abstain. Thanks, Tim

    12/12/1999 03:29:13
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-30 Voting
    2. Yes, Tina Vickery In a message dated 12/12/1999 6:44:58 PM Eastern Standard Time, tstowell@chattanooga.net writes: > Please cast your vote on Motion 99-30 - to add regional email lists to > Volunteer's Info page - > > by saying your equivalent of yes, no or abstain. > > Thanks, > > Tim

    12/12/1999 01:24:29
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-29 Voting
    2. Yes, Tina Vickery In a message dated 12/12/1999 1:21:06 PM Eastern Standard Time, tstowell@chattanooga.net writes: > Please cast your vote on Motion 99-29 - to restore USGenWeb-ALL-L to > Volunteer's Info page - > > by saying your equivalent of yes, no or abstain. > > Thanks, > > Tim

    12/12/1999 01:21:16
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-29 Voting
    2. Joy Fisher
    3. yes At 01:29 PM 12/12/99 -0500, you wrote: >Please cast your vote on Motion 99-29 - to restore USGenWeb-ALL-L to >Volunteer's Info page - > >by saying your equivalent of yes, no or abstain. > >Thanks, > >Tim >

    12/12/1999 11:34:56
    1. [BOARD-L] Motion 99-29 Voting
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. Please cast your vote on Motion 99-29 - to restore USGenWeb-ALL-L to Volunteer's Info page - by saying your equivalent of yes, no or abstain. Thanks, Tim

    12/12/1999 11:29:37
    1. [BOARD-L] Motion 99-32 Secretary position
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. Now that the motion designated as 99-32 made by Gloria: "that we accept the nomination of Ken Short for the postition of Secretary of the Advisory Board to replace the retiring Ed Book" has received a second from Ginger, discussion on this motion is now open. Tim

    12/12/1999 11:25:59
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Nomination for Secretary
    2. Ginger
    3. I second the nomination of Ken Short for Secretary. I'm sure he'll do a fine job. I'd also like to extend my thanks to Ed Book for his service as Secretary to the Board and wish him the best. Ginger gingerh@shawneelink.com -----Original Message----- From: Gloria B Mayfield <gbmayfield@tyler.net> To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Sunday, December 12, 1999 6:34 AM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Nomination for Secretary >I made a motion that we accept the nomination of Ken Short for the >postition of Secretary of the Advisory Board to replace the retiring Ed >Book. Gloria > >Tim Stowell wrote: >> >> As it was with my nomination of Ed Book for Secretary - I didn't have to >> think too hard for this nomination. >> >> I've contacted my nominee and he has agreed to serve. >> >> I await your motion of approval for my nominee for Secretary, Ken Short. >> >> For those of you who don't know Ken, his IRC handle is Pecos and he is: >> >> Far West Tx Regional Coordinator and CC for these Texas counties: >> >> Jeff Davis < http:www.rootsweb.com/~txjejjda/index.html> >> Brewster <http://www.rootsweb.com/~txbrewst/index.html> >> Presidio <http://www.rootsweb.com/~txpresid/index.html> >> >> Tim > >-- >Southwest/South Central CC Representative, USGenWeb Advisory Board >Personal page http://www.angelfire.com/tx2/gmayfield/index.html >TX Tombstone Project Manager http://www.rootsweb.com/~cemetery/Texas/ >Texas Surnames http://www.rootsweb.com/~txrusk/txsurnames.html >Panola County TX USGenWeb http://www.rootsweb.com/~txpanola/ >Rusk County TX USGenWeb http://www.rootsweb.com/~txrusk/index.htm >

    12/12/1999 05:51:27
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Nomination for Secretary
    2. Gloria B. Mayfield
    3. I made a motion that we accept the nomination of Ken Short for the postition of Secretary of the Advisory Board to replace the retiring Ed Book. Gloria Tim Stowell wrote: > > As it was with my nomination of Ed Book for Secretary - I didn't have to > think too hard for this nomination. > > I've contacted my nominee and he has agreed to serve. > > I await your motion of approval for my nominee for Secretary, Ken Short. > > For those of you who don't know Ken, his IRC handle is Pecos and he is: > > Far West Tx Regional Coordinator and CC for these Texas counties: > > Jeff Davis < http:www.rootsweb.com/~txjejjda/index.html> > Brewster <http://www.rootsweb.com/~txbrewst/index.html> > Presidio <http://www.rootsweb.com/~txpresid/index.html> > > Tim -- Southwest/South Central CC Representative, USGenWeb Advisory Board Personal page http://www.angelfire.com/tx2/gmayfield/index.html TX Tombstone Project Manager http://www.rootsweb.com/~cemetery/Texas/ Texas Surnames http://www.rootsweb.com/~txrusk/txsurnames.html Panola County TX USGenWeb http://www.rootsweb.com/~txpanola/ Rusk County TX USGenWeb http://www.rootsweb.com/~txrusk/index.htm

    12/12/1999 05:37:04
    1. [BOARD-L] Nomination for Secretary
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. As it was with my nomination of Ed Book for Secretary - I didn't have to think too hard for this nomination. I've contacted my nominee and he has agreed to serve. I await your motion of approval for my nominee for Secretary, Ken Short. For those of you who don't know Ken, his IRC handle is Pecos and he is: Far West Tx Regional Coordinator and CC for these Texas counties: Jeff Davis < http:www.rootsweb.com/~txjejjda/index.html> Brewster <http://www.rootsweb.com/~txbrewst/index.html> Presidio <http://www.rootsweb.com/~txpresid/index.html> Tim

    12/11/1999 09:59:49
    1. [BOARD-L] Motion 99-31 amended
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. Discussion now opens regarding Motion 99-31 amended as follows: add USGW_ALL@listbot to Volunteer's Info page. Tim

    12/11/1999 07:52:01
    1. [BOARD-L] Secretary position
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. I'll be forwarding my nominee for Board Secretary as soon as I hear from them regarding the position. Tim

    12/11/1999 07:48:33
    1. [BOARD-L] USGenWeb Secretary Position
    2. Ed Book
    3. Hi, Tim, Because of personal and family health problems, I haven't been able to be online at all for several weeks and I will probably not be able to spend much time online for at least the next month. As a result, I think it would be in the USGenWeb Project's best interest for me to resign as Secretary. Please accept my apologies for being unable to give this position the necessary attention. <snip> Ed Book

    12/11/1999 07:20:40
    1. [BOARD-L] Motion to add USGenWeb-DISCUSS-L to Volunteer's Info
    2. Teri Pettit
    3. And, completing the set (!), In the interests of helping new volunteers know what venues are available for discussing matters of common interest, I move that subscription directions for the discussion list USGenWeb-DISCUSS-L@rootsweb.com be added to the Info for Volunteers - Mailing Lists page currently located at: http://www.usgenweb.org/volunteers/mail.html along with the information that subscription to this list is voluntary. - --------------------------------------------------------- This is the last one, I think. I know of no more mailing lists for project members at large. Are there any I don't know about? (The only mailing lists I know of that I haven't motioned on are those for the special projects volunteers, and it should be up to the managers of those projects if they want to ask to be included on the general Mailing Lists page.)

    12/10/1999 05:28:11
    1. [BOARD-L] 2nd call: Is USGenWeb-Discuss-L still wanted?
    2. Teri Pettit
    3. On Wednesday, 8 Dec 1999, I sent a msg to USGenWeb-Discuss-L asking: > >I am currently making motions to the USGenWeb Advisory Board to >add to the Info for Volunteers - Mailing Lists page located at: > > http://www.usgenweb.org/volunteers/mail.html > >subscription information for the various voluntary discussion lists. >> >Is there >anyone subscribed to USGenWeb-Discuss-L who is not subscribed to >USGenWeb-ALL-L, and who would like to give this list increased >exposure? I only got two replies to the question, one from Abby Balderman, who said that she was "only subscribed to this list (USGenWeb Discuss) and have no intention of ever resubscribing to the USGenWeb-ALL list", and one from Melissa Simmons who said "let's keep -ALL and dump -DISCUSS. I agree that -DISCUSS is repetitive." (BTW, I was not proposing closing USGenWeb-DISCUSS-L, just asking whether its current subscribers want it to be advertised.) Two data points isn't a lot to go on. Is there anyone else who has an opinion as to whether they want USGenWeb-DISCUSS-L to be listed on the volunteers/mail.html page? Teri Pettit pettit@adobe.com SE/MA CC Rep http://www.best.com/~tpettit/usgenweb/board99.html#communication

    12/10/1999 04:20:06
    1. [BOARD-L] Motion to add USGW-CC-L to Volunteer's Info
    2. Teri Pettit
    3. Since Motion 99-31 has been amended to list only USGW_ALL@listbot.com - ---------------------------------------------------------- In the interests of helping new volunteers know what venues are available for discussing matters of common interest, and in recognition that all USGenWeb project members are equally deserving of full inclusion in the USGenWeb family, I move that subscription directions for the discussion list USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org be added to the Info for Volunteers - Mailing Lists page currently located at: http://www.usgenweb.org/volunteers/mail.html along with the information that subscription to this list is voluntary and open only to USGenWeb County Coordinators. Teri Pettit pettit@adobe.com SE/MA CC Rep http://www.best.com/~tpettit/usgenweb/board99.html#communication

    12/10/1999 02:57:49
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-31 Motion to add USGW-CC-L and USGW_ALL@listbot to Volunteer's Info
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. --=====================_9365259==_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Since Teri has offered to accept the modification of 99-31, if Virginia - her second will agree then I believe there's no reason for further discussion of the amendment - the motion can be modified and discussion can begin on the newly modified motion. Tim At 10:10 PM 12/9/99 -0800, you wrote: > >Now that Teri's motion to add USGW-CC-L and USGW_ALL@listbot to Volunteer's > >Info page has received a second from Virginia - the Motion numbered 99-31 > >would now be open for discussion. > > > >However, as it now has a suggested amendment by Ginger: I move to amend > >this motion as follows: "To strike the USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org list from > >this motion and to make this motion only include USGW_ALL@listbot.com (aka > >The Daily Board Show)". Since this amendment has been seconded by Richard, > >discussion instead opens on the amendment. > > > > > >Tim > >Tim, > >I would be happy to accept Ginger's amendment, and then introduce >a fourth motion listing only USGW-CC-L. In general, I prefer to split >motions up whenever people might like one part and not another. >(One of my pet peeves about the way our state and national legislatures >work is all those huge omnibus bills where you can't get something >you want without getting a whole bunch of stuff you don't.) > >I guess I just assumed that most board members would vote the same >way on one of those two as they voted on the other (the category >they share being "non-Rootsweb-hosted lists".) If that assumption >was wrong, by all means separate them. > >Does this mean it is a "friendly amendment" and doesn't have to >be voted on? > >I just hope nobody wants to split up the 4 regional lists into >separate motions. :-) > >// Teri > --=====================_9365259==_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" [Settings] NC=1 Code=NC UserSignatures=1 POPAccount=tstowell@mail.chattanooga.net RealName=Tim Stowell ReturnAddress=tstowell@chattanooga.net DomainQualifier= SMTPServer=mail.mccallie.org PopServer=mail.chattanooga.net LoginName=tstowell ImapDirectoryPrefix= Stationery= Signature=<No Default> LeaveOnServerDays=0 BigMessageThreshold=40960 IMAPMaxDownloadSize=0 TrashMailboxName=Trash CheckMailByDefault=1 LeaveMailOnServer=1 AuthenticateKerberos=0 AuthenticateAPOP=0 UseWinSock=1 AuthenticateRPA=0 UsesIMAP=0 UsesPOP=1 AuthenticatePassword=1 DeleteMailFromServer=0 ServerDelete=0 SkipBigMessages=0 IMAPMinDownload=1 IMAPOmitAttachments=0 TransferToTrashOnDelete=0 MarkAsDeleted=1 AutoReceiveAttachmentsDirectory=C:\TESTMAIL\Attach TidyAttach=1 FilterReport=1 AutomationEnabled=1 EmptyTrashOnQuit=1 ACListInAlphaOrder=1 MailboxSuperclose=1 MailboxShowPriority=0 MailboxShowLabel=0 MailboxShowServerStatus=0 ShowMailboxLines=1 LastOptionsCategory=9 [Mappings] out=txt,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=doc,MSWD,,application,msword out=mcw,MSWD,WDBN,application,msword in=xls,XCEL,,, out=xls,XCEL,XLS4,, both=xlc,XCEL,XLC3,, both=xlm,XCEL,XLM3,, both=xlw,XCEL,XLW,, both=ppt,PPT3,SLD3,, both=wav,SCPL,WAVE,audio,microsoft-wave both=grp,,,application,microsoft-group both=wri,,,application,microsoft-write both=cal,,,application,microsoft-calendar both=zip,pZIP,pZIP,application,zip both=rtf,MSWD,TEXT,application,rtf both=pdf,,,application,pdf both=ps,,,application,postscript in=eps,,EPSF,, out=eps,dPro,EPSF,application,postscript both=jpg,JVWR,JPEG,image,jpeg out=jpeg,JVWR,JPEG,image,jpeg both=jfif,JFIF,JPEG,image,jpeg both=gif,JVWR,GIFf,image,gif both=tif,JVWR,TIFF,image,tiff both=mpg,mMPG,MPEG,video,mpeg both=mpeg,mMPG,MPEG,video,mpeg both=mov,TVOD,MooV,video,quicktime both=qt,TVOD,MooV,video,quicktime both=png,,PNGf,image,png both=htm,,,text,html out=html,,,text,html out=1st,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=aif,SCPL,AIFF,, both=arc,arc*,mArc,, both=arj,DArj,BINA,, out=asc,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain out=asm,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=au,SCPL,ULAW,, out=bas,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain out=bat,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain out=bga,JVWR,BMPp,, both=bmp,JVWR,BMPp,, out=c,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=cgm,GKON,CGMm,, out=cmd,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain out=com,mdos,BINA,, out=cp,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain out=cpp,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=cpt,CPCT,PACT,, out=csv,XCEL,TEXT,, both=cvs,DAD2,drw2,, out=dif,XCEL,TEXT,, both=dl,GKON,DLdI,, both=dvi,OTEX,ODVI,, out=exe,mdos,BINA,, out=faq,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain out=flc,GKON,FLI,, both=fli,GKON,FLI,, both=fm,FMPR,FMPR,, out=for,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=gl,AnVw,,, both=gz,Gzip,Gzip,, out=h,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=hqx,BnHq,TEXT,application,mac-binhex40 both=ico,GKON,ICO,, both=iff,GKON,ILBM,, both=ima,dCpy,dImg,, both=img,GKON,IMGg,, out=ini,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=lbm,GKON,ILBM,, both=lha,LARC,LHA,, both=lzh,LARC,LHA,, out=m3,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=mac,dPro,PICT,, out=mak,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain out=me,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=mod,SCPL,STrk,, both=msp,GKON,MSPp,, out=out,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain out=p,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=PAC,GKON,STAD,, out=pas,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=pbm,GKON,PPGM,, both=pcs,GKON,PICS,, both=pct,ttxt,PICT,, both=pcx,GKON,PCXx,, both=pgm,GKON,PPGM,, both=pic,ttxt,PICT,, both=pit,UPIT,PIT,, both=plt,GKON,HPGL,, both=pm,GKON,PMpm,, both=pm3,ALD3,ALB3,, both=pm4,ALD4,ALB4,, both=pm5,ALD5,ALB5,, both=pntg,SPNT,PNTG,, both=ppm,GKON,PPGM,, out=prn,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain both=psd,8BIM,8BPS,, both=qxd,XPRS,XDOC,, both=rif,GKON,RIFF,, both=rle,GKON,RLE,, both=shp,GKON,SHPp,, both=sit,SITx,SIT!,, both=sit,SITx,SITD,, both=slk,XCEL,TEXT,, both=spc,GKON,Spec,, both=sr,GKON,SUNn,, both=sun,GKON,SUNn,, both=sup,GKON,SCRN,, both=svx,SCPL,8SVX,, both=tar,TAR,TARF,, both=tex,OTEX,TEXT,, both=tga,8BIM,TPIC,, both=tga,GKON,TARG,, out=tx8,ttxt,TEXT,text,plain out=vga,JVWR,BMPp,, both=wks,L123,WKS,, both=wmf,GKON,WMF,, both=wp,WPC2,.WP5,application,wordperfect5.1 both=wp5,WPC2,.WP5,application,wordperfect5.1 both=z,LZIV,ZIVU,, both=zoo,Booz,Zoo,, both=qcp,Blad,celp,audio,vnd.qcelp [DirectoryServices] OldKeepOnTopConverted=1 [Labels] LabelCount=7 Label1=255,128,0,Label 1 Label2=255,0,0,Label 2 Label3=255,0,255,Label 3 Label4=0,128,255,Label 4 Label5=0,0,255,Label 5 Label6=0,128,0,Label 6 Label7=128,64,64,Label 7 --=====================_9365259==_--

    12/10/1999 08:49:35
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-31 Motion to add USGW-CC-L andUSGW_ALL@listbot to Volunteer's Info
    2. Ginger
    3. Teri and all, This is definitely a friendly amendment and if you still feel USGWCC-L needs to be voted on then make that a seperate motion. Guess maybe I should explain my reason for the amendment a bit. I believe USGWCC-L should not even be considered because it is exclusionary. The list is not open to all project members. The list appears to have been created as a forum for those who enjoy bashing the project and RW. Folks that have divergent opionions from those of the list owner and the rest of these folks are banned. I'm sure the first thing to come up is that there are folks that have been banned from other project lists, but that banning was done by the server and not by members, or the board, of the USGW Project. I personally have never supported that ban, but we have no control over that. While I also do not support the DBS, distributed by means of USGW_ALL@listbot.com, it is open to all project members, to the best of my knowledge. I'm not sure why we are even considering adding the DBS, USGW_ALL@listbot.com, since it is merely one CC's forum for amusing herself at the expense of others and her own public avenue for the RW bashing she seems to take such delight in. But, since it does appear to be open to all project members, I would consider it a more legitimate forum to vote on than USGW-CC-L. Ginger gingerh@shawneelink.com -----Original Message----- From: Teri Pettit <pettit@Adobe.COM> To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Friday, December 10, 1999 12:58 AM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-31 Motion to add USGW-CC-L andUSGW_ALL@listbot to Volunteer's Info >>Now that Teri's motion to add USGW-CC-L and USGW_ALL@listbot to Volunteer's >>Info page has received a second from Virginia - the Motion numbered 99-31 >>would now be open for discussion. >> >>However, as it now has a suggested amendment by Ginger: I move to amend >>this motion as follows: "To strike the USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org list from >>this motion and to make this motion only include USGW_ALL@listbot.com (aka >>The Daily Board Show)". Since this amendment has been seconded by Richard, >>discussion instead opens on the amendment. >> >> >>Tim > >Tim, > >I would be happy to accept Ginger's amendment, and then introduce >a fourth motion listing only USGW-CC-L. In general, I prefer to split >motions up whenever people might like one part and not another. >(One of my pet peeves about the way our state and national legislatures >work is all those huge omnibus bills where you can't get something >you want without getting a whole bunch of stuff you don't.) > >I guess I just assumed that most board members would vote the same >way on one of those two as they voted on the other (the category >they share being "non-Rootsweb-hosted lists".) If that assumption >was wrong, by all means separate them. > >Does this mean it is a "friendly amendment" and doesn't have to >be voted on? > >I just hope nobody wants to split up the 4 regional lists into >separate motions. :-) > >// Teri > > >

    12/10/1999 07:40:40
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-31 Motion to add USGW-CC-L and USGW_ALL@listbot to Volunteer's Info
    2. Teri Pettit
    3. >Now that Teri's motion to add USGW-CC-L and USGW_ALL@listbot to Volunteer's >Info page has received a second from Virginia - the Motion numbered 99-31 >would now be open for discussion. > >However, as it now has a suggested amendment by Ginger: I move to amend >this motion as follows: "To strike the USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org list from >this motion and to make this motion only include USGW_ALL@listbot.com (aka >The Daily Board Show)". Since this amendment has been seconded by Richard, >discussion instead opens on the amendment. > > >Tim Tim, I would be happy to accept Ginger's amendment, and then introduce a fourth motion listing only USGW-CC-L. In general, I prefer to split motions up whenever people might like one part and not another. (One of my pet peeves about the way our state and national legislatures work is all those huge omnibus bills where you can't get something you want without getting a whole bunch of stuff you don't.) I guess I just assumed that most board members would vote the same way on one of those two as they voted on the other (the category they share being "non-Rootsweb-hosted lists".) If that assumption was wrong, by all means separate them. Does this mean it is a "friendly amendment" and doesn't have to be voted on? I just hope nobody wants to split up the 4 regional lists into separate motions. :-) // Teri

    12/09/1999 11:10:36
    1. [BOARD-L] Motion 99-31 Motion to add USGW-CC-L and USGW_ALL@listbot to Volunteer's Info
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. Now that Teri's motion to add USGW-CC-L and USGW_ALL@listbot to Volunteer's Info page has received a second from Virginia - the Motion numbered 99-31 would now be open for discussion. However, as it now has a suggested amendment by Ginger: I move to amend this motion as follows: "To strike the USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org list from this motion and to make this motion only include USGW_ALL@listbot.com (aka The Daily Board Show)". Since this amendment has been seconded by Richard, discussion instead opens on the amendment. Tim

    12/09/1999 09:50:20
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion to add USGW-CC-L and USGW-ALL to Volunteer's Info
    2. RichPump
    3. I second the motion. Richard M. Howland Ginger wrote: > > I move to amend this motion as follows: > To strike the USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org list from this > motion and to make this motion only include > USGW_ALL@listbot.com (aka The Daily Board Show) > > Ginger > gingerh@shawneelink.com > > -----Original Message----- > From: Teri Pettit <pettit@Adobe.COM> > To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> > Date: Wednesday, December 08, 1999 3:13 PM > Subject: [BOARD-L] Motion to add USGW-CC-L and USGW-ALL to Volunteer's Info > > >In the interests of helping new volunteers know what venues are > >available for discussing matters of common interest, I move that > >subscription directions for the following two discussion lists > > > > USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org > > USGW-ALL@listbot.com (aka The Daily Board Show) > > > >be added to the Info for Volunteers - Mailing Lists page currently > >located at: > > > > http://www.usgenweb.org/volunteers/mail.html > > > >along with the information that subscription to either of these > >lists is voluntary. > > > >Teri Pettit > >pettit@adobe.com > >SE/MA CC Rep > >http://www.best.com/~tpettit/usgenweb/board99.html#communication > > > > > > -- Richard M. Howland Mailto:RichPump@wf.net ICQ # 898319 NE/NCR CC Representative HOWLAND-L List Co-ordinator WOODWORKING-L list Co-ordinator VARNER-L List Co-ordinator FISHING-L list Co-ordinator ILPIATT-L List Co-ordinator HEDGEHOGS-L List Co-ordinator TXYOUNG-L List Co-ordinator http://www.rootsweb.com/~ilpiatt/piatt.htm http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~richpump/YoungCountyCemPage.htm http://www.pets.rootsweb.com/~hedgehogs/index.html http://www.crafts.rootsweb.com/~woodworking/index.html http://www.wf.net/~richpump/HowlandOnLine.html

    12/09/1999 06:40:38