RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Previous Page      Next Page
Total: 6320/9051
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] USGenWeb Census Project
    2. Joy Fisher
    3. At 03:22 PM 12/27/99 -0500, you wrote: >Why has the link for the USGenWeb Census Project been removed from our >National website?? I don't understand. When I went to the National web site http://www.usgenweb.com And then click on the Census Project, I am taken to the USGW Census Project. Please explain. <snip>

    12/28/1999 11:59:20
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] USGenWeb Census Project
    2. In a message dated 12/28/1999 2:03:25 PM Eastern Standard Time, jfisher@ucla.edu writes: << http://www.usgenweb.com And then click on the Census Project, I am taken to the USGW Census Project. Please explain. >> Yesterday there was a redirect there to the USGenWeb Archives Census Project. It seems to have now been removed. Virginia Cisewski NW-Plains CC Rep

    12/28/1999 07:16:57
    1. [BOARD-L] USGenWeb Census Project
    2. Why has the link for the USGenWeb Census Project been removed from our National website?? Why was it replaced with a link to the Archives Census Project which was advised by Motion 99- 4 to cease soliciting census transcriptions and concentrate on transcription of other kinds of data? Removing a link to a Special Project of the USGenWeb Project from the National website is a serious action and requires Board approval. Replacing this link with one to a sub-project that the Board has previously stated should not even exist is, at least improper, at best illegal. In the meanwhile, this unauthorized action has made the efforts of many dedicated volunteers a mockery, inflicted confusion upon them, and will certainly result in alienating many of them. By whose order and under what authority has all this been done??? Virginia Cisewski NW-Plains CC Rep

    12/27/1999 08:22:37
    1. [BOARD-L] Updates to National Pages
    2. Pam Reid
    3. Hi All, I have completed updating the motions pages of the National pages. However, it will be after the first of the year before I can take care of the the volunteer info page. There are many, many updates needed with some of the pages of need of a complete revamp!!! I have been swamped with Christmas and some other things. My 17 year old was in a car accident (she's fine, but the car isn't), our roof was leaking and assorted other little mishaps that have taken up a lot of my time. I apologize for my lack of participation on the Board, my lack of voting on the past few motions and my lag in updating the pages. It might be best for the Project if you all selected a new Webmaster. I love doing the job, but it seems that I am so swamped lately that I don't keep up the way I should. So, maybe this is something you all should begin to think about. Pam

    12/26/1999 03:57:11
    1. [BOARD-L] Season Greetings
    2. Pam Reid
    3. Seasons Greetings to all my friends on this list. Hope you have the happiest of holidays and a wonderful new millennium. Pam

    12/26/1999 03:52:58
    1. [BOARD-L] Seasons Greetings
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. Seasons Greetings, Merry Christmas, Happy Festival of Lights! My wish is that each of you and yours have a very happy, safe and enjoyable set of holidays whatever your choice of holiday may be. Timothy S Stowell email - tstowell@chattanooga.net Chattanooga, TN National Coordinator USGenWeb Project - http://www.usgenweb.org

    12/24/1999 07:46:21
    1. [BOARD-L] Sweeping out the corners
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. Cleaning up the Boardroom and turning down the lights for a few days - a few last notes: Motion 99-31: to add USGW_ALL@listbot to Volunteer's Info page vote totals: Yes - 3; No - 9; Abstain - 1; Not voting - 3. Motion fails with 3/4 of members voting casting a 'No' vote. ---------------- Motion made 12/10 by Teri - 'I move that subscription directions for the discussion list USGenWeb-DISCUSS-L@rootsweb.com be added to the Info for Volunteers' and called again for a second on 12/16 - is declared dead as no second was recieved. ---------------- Motion 99-34 - announced as open for discussion on 12/16: 'Now that Joy's motion "to open subscription to BOARD-L on a read-only basis" has received a second from Shari - the Motion numbered 99-34 is now open for discussion.' This will be voted on in January. Tim

    12/24/1999 12:31:25
    1. [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Results
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. Motion 99-33: "to add the discussion list USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org be added to the Info for Volunteers - page". Vote totals: Yes - 3; No - 8; Abstain - 3; Not voting - 2 Motion fails with 72% of members voting casting a 'No' vote.

    12/24/1999 12:24:59
    1. [BOARD-L] Motion 99-32 Results Revised
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. Due to a miscount on my part - a revised total - no change in the final outcome. Motion 99-32 - the nomination of Ken Short for the postition of Secretary of the Advisory Board to replace the retiring Ed Book. is declared passed with the following vote totals - yes - 11; no - 0; abstain - 2; not voting 3. Tim

    12/23/1999 11:53:30
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] voting / Recess
    2. Tim Stowell
    3. At 08:52 PM 12/23/99 EST, you wrote: >In a message dated 12/22/1999 2:24:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, >tstowell@chattanooga.net writes: > ><< Also at that time, I'm calling for a recess of the Board until 1/3/2000 as > several members are going to be away for the holidays or have other > personal issues that have come up for them. > >> > >Tim, > >Proper parliamentary procedure for this indicates this must be in the form of >a Motion and must be voted on by the members. That's the way it was handled >last year. > >Virginia Cisewski >NW-Plains CC Rep > Checking with Ken on this - Adjournments do require a Board vote. However, a recess does not and can be called by the Chair. Tim

    12/23/1999 11:39:08
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Voting
    2. RootsLady
    3. No RootsLady (aka) Barbara Yancey Dore ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Stowell <tstowell@chattanooga.net> To: <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, December 19, 1999 11:21 PM Subject: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Voting > Please cast your vote on Motion 99-33 - "to add the discussion list > USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org be added to the Info for Volunteers - page". > > by saying your equivalent of yes, no or abstain. > > Thanks, > > Tim > > > > >

    12/23/1999 07:44:13
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 voting / Recess
    2. In a message dated 12/22/1999 2:24:28 AM Eastern Standard Time, tstowell@chattanooga.net writes: << Also at that time, I'm calling for a recess of the Board until 1/3/2000 as several members are going to be away for the holidays or have other personal issues that have come up for them. >> Tim, Proper parliamentary procedure for this indicates this must be in the form of a Motion and must be voted on by the members. That's the way it was handled last year. Virginia Cisewski NW-Plains CC Rep

    12/23/1999 01:52:13
    1. [BOARD-L] Fwd: Thank You
    2. --part1_0.d84c25e4.2593fe5e_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Forwarded by permission. Virginia Cisewski NW-Plains CC Rep --part1_0.d84c25e4.2593fe5e_boundary Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Disposition: inline Return-Path: <ltlbit@mindspring.com> Received: from rly-st01.mail.aol.com (rly-st01.mail.aol.com [172.31.36.134]) by air-yd02.mail.aol.com (v67.7) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:22:10 -0500 Received: from rly-yg03.mx.aol.com (rly-yg03.mail.aol.com [172.18.147.3]) by rly-st01.mail.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) with ESMTP id LAA20400 for <feather2s@aol.com>; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:01:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com (smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110]) by rly-yg03.mx.aol.com (v67.7) with ESMTP; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:01:53 -0500 Received: from brenda (user-38lc875.dialup.mindspring.com [209.86.32.229]) by smtp6.mindspring.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA05443; Thu, 23 Dec 1999 11:00:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <001f01bf4d5e$26316860$e52056d1@brenda> From: "B & C Pierce" <ltlbit@mindspring.com> To: <jpowelljr@gru.net>, <pettit@adobe.com>, <feather2s@aol.com> Subject: Thank You Date: Thu, 23 Dec 1999 10:55:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-7" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 To the three of you - Jim, Terri and Ginger: Thank you for your recent vote to include Don's list. This list is a very informative list and has been the source of a lot of good information. Thank you for your vote and for standing up for what is right. If you continue this in good stead the USGENWEB will prosper. Thank You. Brenda Pierce - RC Metro Region - CC: Paulding, Fulton --part1_0.d84c25e4.2593fe5e_boundary--

    12/23/1999 10:38:22
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Voting
    2. Yes Virginia Cisewski NW-Plains CC Rep

    12/23/1999 01:15:23
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Voting
    2. Holly Timm
    3. No Holly Timm At 12:21 AM 12/20/99 -0500, you wrote: >Please cast your vote on Motion 99-33 - "to add the discussion list >USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org be added to the Info for Volunteers - page". > >by saying your equivalent of yes, no or abstain. > >Thanks, > >Tim > > > >

    12/22/1999 05:01:21
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Voting
    2. Maggie Stewart
    3. No but would reconsider if all CCs are allowed to sub. Maggie ----- Original Message ----- From: Shari Handley <shari@klondyke.net> To: <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 4:55 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Voting I also vote "no", and for the same reasons. Shari -----Original Message----- From: Betsy Mills <betsym@1starnet.com> To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 9:36 AM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Voting >I vote "no." > >I would reconsider my vote on a new motion if this list changes its rules and >allows all CCs to sub. > >Betsy > >At 12:21 AM 12/20/1999 -0500, you wrote: >>Please cast your vote on Motion 99-33 - "to add the discussion list >>USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org be added to the Info for Volunteers - page". >> >>by saying your equivalent of yes, no or abstain. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Tim

    12/22/1999 04:53:23
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Voting
    2. Abstain Tina Vickery In a message dated 12/20/1999 12:21:37 AM Eastern Standard Time, tstowell@chattanooga.net writes: > Please cast your vote on Motion 99-33 - "to add the discussion list > USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org be added to the Info for Volunteers - page". > > by saying your equivalent of yes, no or abstain. > > Thanks, > > Tim

    12/22/1999 04:35:59
  1. 12/22/1999 03:24:48
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Voting
    2. Shari Handley
    3. I also vote "no", and for the same reasons. Shari -----Original Message----- From: Betsy Mills <betsym@1starnet.com> To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Wednesday, December 22, 1999 9:36 AM Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Voting >I vote "no." > >I would reconsider my vote on a new motion if this list changes its rules and >allows all CCs to sub. > >Betsy > >At 12:21 AM 12/20/1999 -0500, you wrote: >>Please cast your vote on Motion 99-33 - "to add the discussion list >>USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org be added to the Info for Volunteers - page". >> >>by saying your equivalent of yes, no or abstain. >> >>Thanks, >> >>Tim

    12/22/1999 02:55:29
    1. Re: [BOARD-L] Motion 99-33 Voting
    2. Garnett J.(Joe) Zsedeny
    3. Abstain Joe Tim Stowell wrote: > > Please cast your vote on Motion 99-33 - "to add the discussion list > USGW-CC-L@usgennet.org be added to the Info for Volunteers - page". > > by saying your equivalent of yes, no or abstain. > > Thanks, > > Tim > > -- email:jzsed@slic.com http://www.rootsweb.com/~jzed/home.htm http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndpembin/pembina.htm http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndramsey/ramsey.htm

    12/22/1999 09:48:36