Here are my vote as they previously appeared... Jim -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [BOARD-L] Motions vote Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 16:06:58 -0700 Resent-From: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 19:05:58 -0400 From: Jim Powell Jr <jpowelljr@gru.net> Reply-To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com To: BOARD-L@rootsweb.com References: <3.0.5.32.20000616180258.008afb40@mail.chattanooga.net> Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: YES Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: NO Jim Tim Stowell wrote: > Since Motions 00-17 and 00-18 are cover the same subject, I'm asking the > members to vote on > them together. > > Please make sure that your vote is the way you want it for each motion. > > Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: > > "I move that the April 1, 2000 cut off date for voter > eligibility be declared contrary to the Bylaws of the > USGenWeb Project and that this Board instruct > the Elections Committee that all members of the > USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance > with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb > Project." > > Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: > > "I hereby move that the April 1, 2000 cutoff date be > affirmed." > > Please vote 'yes', 'no', or 'abstain' on each amendment. > > Tim

Same votes as Pam, Tim. Joe Pam Reid wrote: > > > Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: > > > > "I move that the April 1, 2000 cut off date for voter > > eligibility be declared contrary to the Bylaws of the > > USGenWeb Project and that this Board instruct > > the Elections Committee that all members of the > > USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance > > with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb > > Project." > > No > > > Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: > > > > "I hereby move that the April 1, 2000 cutoff date be > > affirmed." > > > Yes -- Zsedeny Genealogy - http://www.rootsweb.com/~jzed/home.htm NDGenWeb Archives - http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgenweb/nd/ndfiles.htm Pembina County, ND - http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndpembin/pembina.htm Ramsey County, ND - http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndramsey/ramsey.htm

> Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: > > "I move that the April 1, 2000 cut off date for voter > eligibility be declared contrary to the Bylaws of the > USGenWeb Project and that this Board instruct > the Elections Committee that all members of the > USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance > with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb > Project." No > Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: > > "I hereby move that the April 1, 2000 cutoff date be > affirmed." > Yes

Shari Handley shari@tyaskin.com ----- Original Message ----- From: Linda Mason <msgenweb@netdoor.com> To: Shari Handley <shari@mail.klondyke.net> Cc: <USGENWEB-ALL-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, June 19, 2000 9:20 AM Subject: MSGenWeb Ratification of Proposed amendment This is to notify the Advisory Board as well as the USGenWeb All list of the Mississippi Gen Web co-sponsorship of the Recall Amendment. The CC's voted on all three amendments. The votes were as follows: Recall had 13 of 15 votes State Rights had 3 of 15 votes Archives had 6 of 15 votes As the Recall Amendment had the only clear majority of the CC's who voted it is the one that we sponsor at this time. Thank you. This Note may be forwarded as needed in it's entirety. Linda Mason *************** MSGenWeb SC CC/ Listowner Rankin, & Warren Temp for Sharkey UIN 279574 A HEALING CHOICE!! Jim Powell Jr for USGW NC Ellen Pack for SE/MA CC Rep

At 06:02 PM 6/16/00 -0400, you wrote: >Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: Yes. > >Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: > No

From: Roger Swafford <sagitta56@earthlink.net> To: <ELECTIONS-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, June 17, 2000 11:53 AM Subject: [ELECTIONS] EC-Announcement- SC Rep Candidate Greetings, Ref 1. USGWP Bylaws Ref 2. RRoRnr Section 45 In that Ref 1 contains no requirement for a ballot when only one nominee stands for election, the procedures of Ref 2 are hereby implemented. Ms. Betsy Mills is declared as "elected" by acclamation to Southwest / South Central SC Rep. ==== ELECTIONS Mailing List ==== Plese send voter lists to sagitta56@earthlink.net

Tim Stowell wrote: > > Since Motions 00-17 and 00-18 are cover the same subject, I'm asking the > members to vote on > them together. > > Please make sure that your vote is the way you want it for each motion. > > Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: I vote NO to 00-17 Richard... > Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: > I vote NO to 00-18 Richard... > > Please vote 'yes', 'no', or 'abstain' on each amendment. > > Tim -- Richard M. Howland IlGenWeb State Coordinator Mailto:illinois@usroots.com ICQ # 898319 NE/NCR CC Representative USGWP Advisory Board ILGEN-L List Co-ordinator ILPIATT-L List Co-ordinator IL-CHAT-L List Co-ordinator TXYOUNG-L List Co-ordinator http://www.rootsweb.com/~ilpiatt/piatt.htm http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~richpump/YoungCountyCemPage.htm http://www.pets.rootsweb.com/~hedgehogs/index.html http://www.crafts.rootsweb.com/~woodworking/index.html http://www.wf.net/~richpump/HowlandOnLine.html

I feel that Motions 00-17 doesn't work for me. Cut of dates are not contrary to the bylaws. As they are not mentioned either way. I find it sad that the EC has to even be put in the position of having to consider finding away to keep even the supposed voter fraud from affecting the elections. I also fee that this Board instructing the Elections Committee that all members of the USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb Project." is unnessary. Only the members declared eligible in the bylaws are eligible. On Motion 00-18 I feel that the Election committee is inpowered by the bylaws to oversee elections. Overseeing the elections means that they see to it that everone eligible get a fair chance to vote and be elected. So there is no need for the AB to become involved unless they are attemping to in some way not do there duty too USGWP. Richard... Tim Stowell wrote: > > Since Motions 00-17 and 00-18 are cover the same subject, I'm asking the > members to vote on > them together. > > Please make sure that your vote is the way you want it for each motion. > > Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: > > "I move that the April 1, 2000 cut off date for voter > eligibility be declared contrary to the Bylaws of the > USGenWeb Project and that this Board instruct > the Elections Committee that all members of the > USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance > with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb > Project." > > Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: > > "I hereby move that the April 1, 2000 cutoff date be > affirmed." > > Please vote 'yes', 'no', or 'abstain' on each amendment. > > Tim -- Richard M. Howland IlGenWeb State Coordinator Mailto:illinois@usroots.com ICQ # 898319 NE/NCR CC Representative USGWP Advisory Board ILGEN-L List Co-ordinator ILPIATT-L List Co-ordinator IL-CHAT-L List Co-ordinator TXYOUNG-L List Co-ordinator http://www.rootsweb.com/~ilpiatt/piatt.htm http://homepages.rootsweb.com/~richpump/YoungCountyCemPage.htm http://www.pets.rootsweb.com/~hedgehogs/index.html http://www.crafts.rootsweb.com/~woodworking/index.html http://www.wf.net/~richpump/HowlandOnLine.html

Motion 00-17 No. Motion 00-18 Yes. Tina Vickery

Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: : : "I move that the April 1, 2000 cut off date for voter : eligibility be declared contrary to the Bylaws of the : USGenWeb Project and that this Board instruct : the Elections Committee that all members of the : USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance : with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb : Project." NO : : : Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: : : "I hereby move that the April 1, 2000 cutoff date be : affirmed." YES Shari Handley

> >Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: Yes > >Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: > No Ginger gingerh@shawneelink.com

Motion 00-17 = No Motion 00-18 = Yes RootsLady (aka) Barbara Yancey Dore ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tim Stowell" <tstowell@chattanooga.net> To: <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 5:02 PM Subject: [BOARD-L] Motions vote > Since Motions 00-17 and 00-18 are cover the same subject, I'm asking the > members to vote on > them together. > > Please make sure that your vote is the way you want it for each motion. > > > Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: > > "I move that the April 1, 2000 cut off date for voter > eligibility be declared contrary to the Bylaws of the > USGenWeb Project and that this Board instruct > the Elections Committee that all members of the > USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance > with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb > Project." > > > Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: > > "I hereby move that the April 1, 2000 cutoff date be > affirmed." > > Please vote 'yes', 'no', or 'abstain' on each amendment. > > Tim >

Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: NO Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: YES Maggie ----- Original Message ----- From: Tim Stowell <tstowell@chattanooga.net> To: <BOARD-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2000 6:02 PM Subject: [BOARD-L] Motions vote Since Motions 00-17 and 00-18 are cover the same subject, I'm asking the members to vote on them together. Please make sure that your vote is the way you want it for each motion. Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: "I move that the April 1, 2000 cut off date for voter eligibility be declared contrary to the Bylaws of the USGenWeb Project and that this Board instruct the Elections Committee that all members of the USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb Project." Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: "I hereby move that the April 1, 2000 cutoff date be affirmed." Please vote 'yes', 'no', or 'abstain' on each amendment. Tim

At 06:02 PM 6/16/00 -0400, you wrote: >Motion 00-17 - YES >Motion 00-18 - NO Holly Timm

>Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: YES >Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: NO

Motion 00-17 ---> No Motion 00-18 ---> Yes Joe Tim Stowell wrote: > > Since Motions 00-17 and 00-18 are cover the same subject, I'm asking the > members to vote on > them together. > > Please make sure that your vote is the way you want it for each motion. > > Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: > > "I move that the April 1, 2000 cut off date for voter > eligibility be declared contrary to the Bylaws of the > USGenWeb Project and that this Board instruct > the Elections Committee that all members of the > USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance > with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb > Project." > > Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: > > "I hereby move that the April 1, 2000 cutoff date be > affirmed." > > Please vote 'yes', 'no', or 'abstain' on each amendment. > > Tim -- Zsedeny Genealogy - http://www.rootsweb.com/~jzed/home.htm NDGenWeb Archives - http://www.rootsweb.com/~usgenweb/nd/ndfiles.htm Pembina County, ND - http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndpembin/pembina.htm Ramsey County, ND - http://www.rootsweb.com/~ndramsey/ramsey.htm

Subj: Posted 1 June 2000 - USGenWeb Archives Project Date: 6/16/00 To: WIGEN-L@rootsweb.com The WIGenWeb Project, with a simple majority of the Wisconsin CCs voting, sponsor this amendment for inclusion on the National Ballot of the USGenWeb Project. 15 in favor 4 opposed. Tina Vickery, SC WIGenWeb Project http://www.rootsweb.com/~wigenweb

Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: YES Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: NO Jim Tim Stowell wrote: > Since Motions 00-17 and 00-18 are cover the same subject, I'm asking the > members to vote on > them together. > > Please make sure that your vote is the way you want it for each motion. > > Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: > > "I move that the April 1, 2000 cut off date for voter > eligibility be declared contrary to the Bylaws of the > USGenWeb Project and that this Board instruct > the Elections Committee that all members of the > USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance > with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb > Project." > > Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: > > "I hereby move that the April 1, 2000 cutoff date be > affirmed." > > Please vote 'yes', 'no', or 'abstain' on each amendment. > > Tim

Since Motions 00-17 and 00-18 are cover the same subject, I'm asking the members to vote on them together. Please make sure that your vote is the way you want it for each motion. Motion 00-17 - made by Ginger, seconded by Virginia: "I move that the April 1, 2000 cut off date for voter eligibility be declared contrary to the Bylaws of the USGenWeb Project and that this Board instruct the Elections Committee that all members of the USGenWeb Project are eligible to vote in accordance with the duly adopted Bylaws of The USGenWeb Project." Motion 00-18 - made by Joe, seconded by Maggie: "I hereby move that the April 1, 2000 cutoff date be affirmed." Please vote 'yes', 'no', or 'abstain' on each amendment. Tim

The results of the vote on Motion 00-16: Motion 00-16 made by Maggie and seconded by Barbara: I move to adopt the following standing rule; "It is the responsibility of each member of The USGenWeb Project to demonstrate membership in good standing by; promoting a positive public image of the project, and working to enhance its good name and reputation, and contributing to its operations. In addition, members must respond promptly to email, actively support researchers' efforts to find information, maintain their website with appropriate, up-to-date content, and serving as a good example of the guidelines and standards of The USGenWeb Project." Yes - 0; No - 0; Abstain - 0; Not voting - 15. Motion fails for lack of interest. Tim