For the record, the stipend that I was paid to write this article will be applied to the cost of the domain registrations and hosting for the USGenWeb Project. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tina S. Vickery Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:58 PM To: Archives Discussion List; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; usgenweb-discuss; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [BOARD] Volunteer Projects Help Family Historians USGenWeb Project featured! http://experts.archives.com/ Congratulations to our National Coordinator, Sherri Bradley! You have done the USGenWeb Project proud! Tina Vickery USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

David, I do not need your assistance in counting to 14; or I still have all of my fingers and toes, so I can count to 20 without having to borrow someone else's. <g> I am perfectly able to determine when a motion passes or fails, per either Sturgis or our Project's bylaws without your assistance. Just because you determine that a motion has failed and decide to make another one (motion), that motion is still out of order until the former motion is formally declared either passed or failed. A second to the motion that is out of order is also out of order because the floor is not open. The motion to call the question has now been declared, so if you wish to move to table motion 2009/10-23, that motion will need to be made again. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php -----Original Message----- From: W David Samuelsen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:01 PM To: [email protected] Cc: Cyndie Enfinger; Dale Grimm; DC & Alice Allen; Pauli Smith; Colleen Pustola; [email protected]; Les Shockley; Jeff Kemp; Denise Wells; Larry Flesher; [email protected]; Linda Lewis; Tina Vickery; Sherri Subject: Re: [BOARD] To Lay on the Table This is the one tabling that motion. I checked Sturgis. By the way the "call the question" motion failed. Hence Tina commented as soon as she didn't get 9 (6 disagrees killed it out of 13) prompted this motion. David Samuelsen

Dale is correct. There is currently a motion on the table so the additional motion by David Samuelsen and second by Colleen Pustola are out of order and cannot be recognized. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Dale Grimm Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:24 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BOARD] To Lay on the Table We already have a motion on the floor. You can only have one open at a time. Dale -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Colleen Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BOARD] To Lay on the Table I second the motion. Colleen Pustola NWPL CC Rep On 4/24/2010 5:54 AM, W David Samuelsen wrote: > I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. > > The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. > > Sturgis page 68-69. > > W. David Samuelsen > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Colleen, the floor was not open for a new motion to be made, so whether you second or not, it is out of order and cannot be recognized. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Colleen Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BOARD] To Lay on the Table I second the motion. Colleen Pustola NWPL CC Rep On 4/24/2010 5:54 AM, W David Samuelsen wrote: > I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. > > The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. > > Sturgis page 68-69. > > W. David Samuelsen > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

With more than one third of the AB members voting "Disagree", the motion to call the question fails. Discussion will continue on motion 2009/10-23. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sherri Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:02 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BOARD] MOTION 2009/10-23 - Call the Question The question has been called on Motion 2009/10-23 by Tina Vickery and seconded by Jeff Kemp. As stated below by Tina, a 2/3 majority is required to pass, which would call for an immediate vote on the motion being discussed. Please signify your response to the Calling of the Question by either "agree" (which would indicate that your choice is that a vote on Motion 2009/10-23 would be taken immediately) or "disagree" (which would indicate that discussion should continue on Motion 2009/10-23). Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tina S. Vickery Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [BOARD] MOTION 2009/10-23 - Call the Question Sherri, I believe the phrase in Parlimentary Procedure is "Calling the question". "The motion to call the previous question requires a second, may not be debated, and requires a two-thirds majority to pass. If it passes, a vote on the pending motion is taken immediately. If it fails, discussion continues on the pending motion." I call the question on MOTION 2009/10-23 - Augmentation of the Grievance Procedures. Tina Vickery Representive at Large USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

On behalf of 99 and 44/100% of the membership, thank you very much, Sherri! Larry Flesher SWSC SC Rep ----- Original Message ---- From: Sherri <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Sat, April 24, 2010 8:07:59 AM Subject: Re: [BOARD] Volunteer Projects Help Family Historians For the record, the stipend that I was paid to write this article will be applied to the cost of the domain registrations and hosting for the USGenWeb Project. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tina S. Vickery Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:58 PM To: Archives Discussion List; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; usgenweb-discuss; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: [BOARD] Volunteer Projects Help Family Historians USGenWeb Project featured! http://experts.archives.com/ Congratulations to our National Coordinator, Sherri Bradley!  You have done the USGenWeb Project proud! Tina Vickery USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

David, I didn't realize there were cardinal rules. I know of the rule that one doesn't comment while they are personally voting on a motion and no member vote can be called into question by another member as they cast their vote, *but* I didn't realize that my commenting on an (although unrecognized result) on my own volition would be out of order. I apologize to you, the membership and to the Advisory Board members for my cardinal error. It was actually an effort to encourage you and others to bring some sort of closure to this issue. I very sincerely hope that can be done. Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: "W David Samuelsen" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; "Dale Grimm" <[email protected]>; "DC & Alice Allen" <[email protected]>; "Pauli Smith" <[email protected]>; "Colleen Pustola" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Les Shockley" <[email protected]>; "Jeff Kemp" <[email protected]>; "Denise Wells" <[email protected]>; "Larry Flesher" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Linda Lewis" <[email protected]>; "Cyndie Enfinger" <[email protected]>; "Sherri" <[email protected]>; "Tina Vickery" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:41 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD] To Lay on the Table > Tina, > > you broke one cardinal rule... commenting *while* voting is taking place, > so soon after 6 disagrees had been posted (more than sufficient to kill > the call) a no-no. > > Otherwise I wouldn't send in this motion tabling the main motion in first > place until the voting is over. (I know from my experience in other > organizations following that type of motions.) > > David > > On 4/23/2010 9:13 PM, Tina S. Vickery wrote: >> The chair has not recognized the call failed. I mentioned it in my note >> to >> give a point of reference. I am sure Sherri will send the results and >> your >> motion will subsequently be recognized. Dale is correct, there is still >> a >> motion on the table. >> >> David, I look forward to your contructive contributions crafting this >> motion. >> >> Tina

The chair has not recognized the call failed. I mentioned it in my note to give a point of reference. I am sure Sherri will send the results and your motion will subsequently be recognized. Dale is correct, there is still a motion on the table. David, I look forward to your contructive contributions crafting this motion. Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: "W David Samuelsen" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Cc: "Cyndie Enfinger" <[email protected]>; "Dale Grimm" <[email protected]>; "DC & Alice Allen" <[email protected]>; "Pauli Smith" <[email protected]>; "Colleen Pustola" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Les Shockley" <[email protected]>; "Jeff Kemp" <[email protected]>; "Denise Wells" <[email protected]>; "Larry Flesher" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Linda Lewis" <[email protected]>; "Tina Vickery" <[email protected]>; "Sherri" <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 11:01 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD] To Lay on the Table > This is the one tabling that motion. I checked Sturgis. > > By the way the "call the question" motion failed. Hence Tina commented as > soon as she didn't get 9 (6 disagrees killed it out of 13) prompted this > motion. > > David Samuelsen > > On 4/23/2010 8:23 PM, Dale Grimm wrote: >> We already have a motion on the floor. You can only have one open at a >> time. >> >> >> Dale >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of Colleen >> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:11 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BOARD] To Lay on the Table >> >> I second the motion. >> >> Colleen Pustola >> NWPL CC Rep >> >> On 4/24/2010 5:54 AM, W David Samuelsen wrote: >>> I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. >>> >>> The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. >>> >>> Sturgis page 68-69. >>> >>> W. David Samuelsen >>> >> >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in >> the subject and the body of the message >> >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >> in the subject and the body of the message >> >>

USGenWeb Project featured! http://experts.archives.com/ Congratulations to our National Coordinator, Sherri Bradley! You have done the USGenWeb Project proud! Tina Vickery

We already have a motion on the floor. You can only have one open at a time. Dale -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Colleen Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:11 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BOARD] To Lay on the Table I second the motion. Colleen Pustola NWPL CC Rep On 4/24/2010 5:54 AM, W David Samuelsen wrote: > I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. > > The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. > > Sturgis page 68-69. > > W. David Samuelsen > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Much better communication, David. Thank. Denise Wells SEMA CC. Rep On Apr 23, 2010, at 4:54 PM, W David Samuelsen <[email protected]> wrote: > I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. > > The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. > > Sturgis page 68-69. > > W. David Samuelsen

I made the call on this question to finally vote on this motion. "Two days of discussion is not enough time to discuss" being the reason by some of you voting 'disagree' to the call. This motion in one rendition or another has been presented and discussed since January 25, 2010, with each time being disrupted as it has been again this time with no solutions, just rhetoric. As we discuss this time, (as it appears the call will fail), those of you that are calling for changes, suggest wording for those changes, state your reasons why you feel they are necessary and please don't call the intentions and good work of you fellow Project members into question as we work to finalize this motion. Tina

I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. Sturgis page 68-69. W. David Samuelsen

Disagree. Colleen NWPL CC Rep On 4/22/2010 7:02 PM, Sherri wrote: > The question has been called on Motion 2009/10-23 by Tina Vickery and > seconded by Jeff Kemp. As stated below by Tina, a 2/3 majority is required > to pass, which would call for an immediate vote on the motion being > discussed. > > Please signify your response to the Calling of the Question by either > "agree" (which would indicate that your choice is that a vote on Motion > 2009/10-23 would be taken immediately) or "disagree" (which would indicate > that discussion should continue on Motion 2009/10-23). > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Tina S. Vickery > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:32 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [BOARD] MOTION 2009/10-23 - Call the Question > > Sherri, I believe the phrase in Parlimentary Procedure is "Calling the > question". > > "The motion to call the previous question requires a second, may not be > debated, and requires a two-thirds majority to pass. If it passes, a vote on > > the pending motion is taken immediately. If it fails, discussion continues > on the pending motion." > > I call the question on MOTION 2009/10-23 - Augmentation of the Grievance > Procedures. > > Tina Vickery > Representive at Large > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

disagree Pauli Smith NENC CC Rep On 4/22/2010 4:02 AM, Sherri wrote: > The question has been called on Motion 2009/10-23 by Tina Vickery and > seconded by Jeff Kemp. As stated below by Tina, a 2/3 majority is required > to pass, which would call for an immediate vote on the motion being > discussed. > > Please signify your response to the Calling of the Question by either > "agree" (which would indicate that your choice is that a vote on Motion > 2009/10-23 would be taken immediately) or "disagree" (which would indicate > that discussion should continue on Motion 2009/10-23). > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org<http://usgenweb.org/> > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Tina S. Vickery > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:32 AM > To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> > Subject: [BOARD] MOTION 2009/10-23 - Call the Question > > Sherri, I believe the phrase in Parlimentary Procedure is "Calling the > question". > > "The motion to call the previous question requires a second, may not be > debated, and requires a two-thirds majority to pass. If it passes, a vote on > > the pending motion is taken immediately. If it fails, discussion continues > on the pending motion." > > I call the question on MOTION 2009/10-23 - Augmentation of the Grievance > Procedures. > > Tina Vickery > Representive at Large > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml> > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml> > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml> ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I thought that this was ready for a vote but since so many want more discussion so will.... Disagree Les Shockey Sherri wrote: > The question has been called on Motion 2009/10-23 by Tina Vickery and > seconded by Jeff Kemp. As stated below by Tina, a 2/3 majority is required > to pass, which would call for an immediate vote on the motion being > discussed. > > Please signify your response to the Calling of the Question by either > "agree" (which would indicate that your choice is that a vote on Motion > 2009/10-23 would be taken immediately) or "disagree" (which would indicate > that discussion should continue on Motion 2009/10-23). > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Tina S. Vickery > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:32 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [BOARD] MOTION 2009/10-23 - Call the Question > > Sherri, I believe the phrase in Parlimentary Procedure is "Calling the > question". > > "The motion to call the previous question requires a second, may not be > debated, and requires a two-thirds majority to pass. If it passes, a vote on > > the pending motion is taken immediately. If it fails, discussion continues > on the pending motion." > > I call the question on MOTION 2009/10-23 - Augmentation of the Grievance > Procedures. > > Tina Vickery > Representive at Large > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

AGREE R/S Larry Flesher SWSC SC Rep ----- Original Message ---- From: Sherri <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Sent: Thu, April 22, 2010 5:02:12 AM Subject: Re: [BOARD] MOTION 2009/10-23 - Call the Question The question has been called on Motion 2009/10-23 by Tina Vickery and seconded by Jeff Kemp.  As stated below by Tina, a 2/3 majority is required to pass, which would call for an immediate vote on the motion being discussed. Please signify your response to the Calling of the Question by either "agree" (which would indicate that your choice is that a vote on Motion 2009/10-23 would be taken immediately) or "disagree" (which would indicate that discussion should continue on Motion 2009/10-23). Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tina S. Vickery Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:32 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [BOARD] MOTION 2009/10-23 - Call the Question Sherri, I believe the phrase in Parlimentary Procedure is "Calling the question". "The motion to call the previous question requires a second, may not be debated, and requires a two-thirds majority to pass. If it passes, a vote on the pending motion is taken immediately. If it fails, discussion continues on the pending motion." I call the question on MOTION 2009/10-23 - Augmentation of the Grievance Procedures. Tina Vickery Representive at Large USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Alice, If you check the message that finally showed up in everyone's mail boxes this morning, you'll see that I sent it on the 12th, not the 21st. I have to wonder as to the cause of the delay in its appearance? Sherri -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DC & Alice Allen Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:13 PM To: [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [USGENWEB-NW] [BOARD] FW: AB Vacancy - NWPL State Coordinator Representative Which was last week ago................. Alice Allen NENC CC Rep *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 4/12/2010 at 6:08 AM [email protected] wrote: >Please note that the message forwarded by David Samuelsen earlier this >morning was incorrect. Applications are being accepted through 15 April >2010 as indicated here below. > >Sherri > >********************** >Reposting as a reminder - applications are being accepted through 15 April >2010. > > >Sherri Bradley >National Coordinator >USGenWeb Project >Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org >Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > ><snip> ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I thought it looked familiar, couldn't figure out why it was showing up now. Alice *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 4/22/2010 at 8:25 PM [email protected] wrote: >Alice, > >If you check the message that finally showed up in everyone's mail boxes >this morning, you'll see that I sent it on the 12th, not the 21st. I have >to wonder as to the cause of the delay in its appearance? > >Sherri > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of DC & Alice Allen >Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:13 PM >To: [email protected]; [email protected] >Subject: Re: [USGENWEB-NW] [BOARD] FW: AB Vacancy - NWPL State Coordinator >Representative > >Which was last week ago................. > >Alice Allen >NENC CC Rep > >*********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > >On 4/12/2010 at 6:08 AM [email protected] wrote: > >>Please note that the message forwarded by David Samuelsen earlier this >>morning was incorrect. Applications are being accepted through 15 April >>2010 as indicated here below. >> >>Sherri >> >>********************** >>Reposting as a reminder - applications are being accepted through 15 April >>2010. >> >> >>Sherri Bradley >>National Coordinator >>USGenWeb Project >>Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org >>Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php >> >><snip> > > > > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >[email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > >USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >[email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes >in the subject and the body of the message

Disagree David Samuelsen On 4/22/2010 4:02 AM, Sherri wrote: > The question has been called on Motion 2009/10-23 by Tina Vickery and > seconded by Jeff Kemp. As stated below by Tina, a 2/3 majority is required > to pass, which would call for an immediate vote on the motion being > discussed. > > Please signify your response to the Calling of the Question by either > "agree" (which would indicate that your choice is that a vote on Motion > 2009/10-23 would be taken immediately) or "disagree" (which would indicate > that discussion should continue on Motion 2009/10-23). > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Tina S. Vickery > Sent: Thursday, April 22, 2010 12:32 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [BOARD] MOTION 2009/10-23 - Call the Question > > Sherri, I believe the phrase in Parlimentary Procedure is "Calling the > question". > > "The motion to call the previous question requires a second, may not be > debated, and requires a two-thirds majority to pass. If it passes, a vote on > > the pending motion is taken immediately. If it fails, discussion continues > on the pending motion." > > I call the question on MOTION 2009/10-23 - Augmentation of the Grievance > Procedures. > > Tina Vickery > Representive at Large > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >