For the record, the Advisory Board has been considering two appeals filed against on the decision in grievance 2009-08-15. These were filed by two different individuals, otherwise only a single appeal would have been allowed that included all points. As a reminder, per the Grievance Procedures, Section V, E.9 at http://usgenweb.org/volunteers/standard-rules.shtml, the AB's role is to determine if the Grievance Procedures were followed, not to rehear the issues. The choices that the Advisory Board has are to affirm the determination or to return the grievance to the Grievance Committee for reconsideration, ensuring that the procedures were followed. The following are the decision of the Advisory Board: Grievance 2009-08-15, Appeal #1 - The Advisory Board has affirmed the decision of the Grievance Committee. Grievance 2009-08-15, Appeal #2 - The Advisory Board has affirmed the decision of the Grievance Committee. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at <http://usgenweb.org> http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda <http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php

It doesn't since there is a separate section describing different type of motion. This one is very specific with no specified time to return to it, allowing us more time to get it right and use simple motion to get it off the table when we are ready. The other tabling motion is more risky because of time constraints it impose on us. In this case the main motion is 2009/10-23 and any subsidiary motions that are attached to this one are tabled same time. David On 4/24/2010 3:28 PM, Lesley L Shockey wrote: > Item 6 leads to a question in which Sturgis seems to contradict itself > or uses language that can cause confusion. > > Page 69, bottom of the page states "When a main motion is postponed > temporarily, all pending amendments and other adhering motions are > postponed with it. > > Page 71, item 7 "Applies to main motion only > > W David Samuelsen wrote: >> Page 68-71 Sturgis >> It is not ambiguous. The explanation is very defined. >> >> There are two different types of tabling motions. >> >> The one I am using: >> >> 1.Requires a second >> 2.is not debatable >> 3.cannot be amended >> 4.requires majority vote >> 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions >> 6.applies to main motions only >> 7.can have no motion applied to it except the motion to withdraw >> >> "To stop debate on the main motion and remove it, with amendments and >> adhering motions, from consideration of the assembly during the current >> meeting or convention unless the posposted motion is brought back before >> the assembly by a motion to resume consideration or to take from the table." >> >> Again, not ambigious, it is a very specifici motion. The other one >> requires specific date, which the current assembly can not act upon >> until that specific date. >> >> David >> >> >> >> On 4/24/2010 1:26 PM, Tina S. Vickery wrote: >>> David, do you have a defintion of temporarily, prior to this being seconded. >>> Temporarily is pretty ambiguous. >>> >>> Tina >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> From: "W David Samuelsen"<[email protected]> >>> To:<[email protected]>; "Linda Lewis"<[email protected]>; >>> <[email protected]>; "Larry Flesher"<[email protected]>; "Les Shockley" >>> <[email protected]>; "Jeff Kemp"<[email protected]>; "Denise >>> Wells"<[email protected]>; "Colleen Pustola"<[email protected]>; >>> <[email protected]>; "Dale Grimm"<[email protected]>; "DC& Alice Allen" >>> <[email protected]>; "Pauli Smith"<[email protected]>; "Cyndie >>> Enfinger"<[email protected]>; "Tina Vickery"<[email protected]>; >>> "Sherri"<[email protected]> >>> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:01 PM >>> Subject: Re-laying the Motion to lay the table 2009/10-23 >>> >>> >>>> At request of the NC: >>>> >>>> I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. >>>> >>>> The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. >>>> >>>> Sturgis page 68-69. >>>> >>>> W. David Samuelsen >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

I don't see that I mentioned it being specific to your Point of Order, except to the extent that I responded to your message with that subject. I will apologize for that oversight on my part. The tabling motion is here: http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2010-04/1272128138 There has not been a second to the motion. I would request that a time frame is specifically stated, otherwise, per Sturgis, no additional debate could occur when the issue is revisited. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of W David Samuelsen Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 3:01 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" How interesting..... Where did I say anything about resign or be removed in this point of order? Much less where is the tabling motion which was sent to the board at your request which was very plain and simple? David Samuelsen On 4/24/2010 12:33 PM, Sherri wrote: > That may well be, David, but why bring it up in such an antagonistic way now > because everyone's not agreeing with your point of view? As pointed out > before, it appears that you're doing nothing except to try to force your own > agenda onto this AB, including trying to force certain members to either > resign or to be removed. > > Sherri > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of W David Samuelsen > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" > > I'm following what the Sturgis says when it comes to the motions. > > David > > On 4/24/2010 11:51 AM, Denise Wells wrote: >> For goodness sake, David, why does everything have to be such a >> fiasco? Can't you just ask a darn question instead of deciding >> everything is a conspiracy? >> >> Denise Wells > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

David, do you have a defintion of temporarily, prior to this being seconded. Temporarily is pretty ambiguous. Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: "W David Samuelsen" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; "Linda Lewis" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Larry Flesher" <[email protected]>; "Les Shockley" <[email protected]>; "Jeff Kemp" <[email protected]>; "Denise Wells" <[email protected]>; "Colleen Pustola" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Dale Grimm" <[email protected]>; "DC & Alice Allen" <[email protected]>; "Pauli Smith" <[email protected]>; "Cyndie Enfinger" <[email protected]>; "Tina Vickery" <[email protected]>; "Sherri" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:01 PM Subject: Re-laying the Motion to lay the table 2009/10-23 > At request of the NC: > > I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. > > The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. > > Sturgis page 68-69. > > W. David Samuelsen >

I find the motion in the Archives, although I still cannot find it in my Board folder. Because I don't have the original email to reply to, I will go ahead and second this motion from this one. Alice Allen NENC CC Rep *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 4/24/2010 at 5:30 PM [email protected] wrote: >David I have seen no second since you made the proper motion four and >one half hours ago. If one was made, I did not receive it. > >Les > >W David Samuelsen wrote: >> This has nothing to do with Point of Order. It is completely separate. >> >> Quoting from Sturgis page 71 >> 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions. You ignored the >second. >> >> David >> >> On 4/24/2010 1:39 PM, Sherri wrote: >>> I don't see that I mentioned it being specific to your Point of Order, >>> except to the extent that I responded to your message with that >subject. I >>> will apologize for that oversight on my part. >>> >>> The tabling motion is here: >>> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2010-04/1272128138 >>> There has not been a second to the motion. I would request that a time >>> frame is specifically stated, otherwise, per Sturgis, no additional >debate >>> could occur when the issue is revisited. >>> >>> >>> Sherri Bradley >>> National Coordinator >>> USGenWeb Project >>> Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org >>> Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php >>>

David, I quote from the USGenWeb Special Rules at http://usgenweb.org/volunteers/special-rules.shtml " VIII. CLOSED SESSION/MEETING CONFIDENTIALITY. A closed session may be called by the Presiding Officer at any time and will be conducted on Mailing List Board-Exec. Discussions in closed session include, but are not limited to, personnel matters, grievances, legal problems and other matters of a highly sensitive nature. Any votes conducted in closed session shall be publicly announced on Mailing List Board. With each change in permanent National Coordinator, the Advisory Board members will be polled to honor the confidentiality of Board-Exec. Honoring confidentiality is not a requirement but those members who do not agree will not be subscribed to Mailing List Board-Exec." Also "II. PARLIAMENTARY AUTHORITY. The parliamentary authority is The Standard Code of Parliamentary Procedure by Alice Sturgis (current revised and updated edition), modified within USGenWeb Special Rules to adapt to the particular needs of conducting a meeting via an electronic internet mailing list." While Sturgis may require a formal motion and second to go into closed session, section VIII, quoted above, does not require a formal motion and second to go into closed (executive) session. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of W David Samuelsen Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:11 PM To: [email protected]; Sherri; Tina Vickery; Cyndie Enfinger; Dale Grimm; DC & Alice Allen; Pauli Smith; Colleen Pustola; [email protected]; Les Shockley; Jeff Kemp; Denise Wells; Larry Flesher; [email protected]; Linda Lewis Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" Point of Order Sturgis page 108-109 Motion must be made and seconded, is priviledged, not debatable or amendable, adopted by majority vote to go into closed session. Each time there is a issue. It can not be used as a blanket. David Samuelsen On 4/24/2010 7:14 AM, Sherri wrote: > It seems that things just keep rolling in one after the other. > For the record, the Advisory Board is continuing in executive session, the > new issue that we're dealing with is the appointment of a NWPL SC > representative. > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at<http://usgenweb.org> > http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> > http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I'm not sure I've seen the motion. My Board mail sorts into a specific folder, and I haven't seen anything in this folder that indicates this motion. I will check the Archives though, maybe my ISP is being persnickety today. Alice NENC CC Rep *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** On 4/24/2010 at 5:30 PM [email protected] wrote: >David I have seen no second since you made the proper motion four and >one half hours ago. If one was made, I did not receive it. > >Les > >W David Samuelsen wrote: >> This has nothing to do with Point of Order. It is completely separate. >> >> Quoting from Sturgis page 71 >> 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions. You ignored the >second. >> >> David >> >> On 4/24/2010 1:39 PM, Sherri wrote: >>> I don't see that I mentioned it being specific to your Point of Order, >>> except to the extent that I responded to your message with that >subject. I >>> will apologize for that oversight on my part. >>> >>> The tabling motion is here: >>> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2010-04/1272128138 >>> There has not been a second to the motion. I would request that a time >>> frame is specifically stated, otherwise, per Sturgis, no additional >debate >>> could occur when the issue is revisited. >>> >>> >>> Sherri Bradley >>> National Coordinator >>> USGenWeb Project >>> Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org >>> Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php

That may well be, David, but why bring it up in such an antagonistic way now because everyone's not agreeing with your point of view? As pointed out before, it appears that you're doing nothing except to try to force your own agenda onto this AB, including trying to force certain members to either resign or to be removed. Sherri -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of W David Samuelsen Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:17 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" I'm following what the Sturgis says when it comes to the motions. David On 4/24/2010 11:51 AM, Denise Wells wrote: > For goodness sake, David, why does everything have to be such a > fiasco? Can't you just ask a darn question instead of deciding > everything is a conspiracy? > > Denise Wells USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

This has nothing to do with Point of Order. It is completely separate. Quoting from Sturgis page 71 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions. You ignored the second. David On 4/24/2010 1:39 PM, Sherri wrote: > I don't see that I mentioned it being specific to your Point of Order, > except to the extent that I responded to your message with that subject. I > will apologize for that oversight on my part. > > The tabling motion is here: > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/BOARD/2010-04/1272128138 > There has not been a second to the motion. I would request that a time > frame is specifically stated, otherwise, per Sturgis, no additional debate > could occur when the issue is revisited. > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of W David Samuelsen > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 3:01 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" > > How interesting..... > > Where did I say anything about resign or be removed in this point of order? > > Much less where is the tabling motion which was sent to the board at > your request which was very plain and simple? > > David Samuelsen > > On 4/24/2010 12:33 PM, Sherri wrote: >> That may well be, David, but why bring it up in such an antagonistic way > now >> because everyone's not agreeing with your point of view? As pointed out >> before, it appears that you're doing nothing except to try to force your > own >> agenda onto this AB, including trying to force certain members to either >> resign or to be removed. >> >> Sherri >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> Behalf Of W David Samuelsen >> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:17 PM >> To: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" >> >> I'm following what the Sturgis says when it comes to the motions. >> >> David >> >> On 4/24/2010 11:51 AM, Denise Wells wrote: >>> For goodness sake, David, why does everything have to be such a >>> fiasco? Can't you just ask a darn question instead of deciding >>> everything is a conspiracy? >>> >>> Denise Wells >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes > in >> the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message >> >> > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

Page 68-71 Sturgis It is not ambiguous. The explanation is very defined. There are two different types of tabling motions. The one I am using: 1.Requires a second 2.is not debatable 3.cannot be amended 4.requires majority vote 5.take precedence over all other subsidiary motions 6.applies to main motions only 7.can have no motion applied to it except the motion to withdraw "To stop debate on the main motion and remove it, with amendments and adhering motions, from consideration of the assembly during the current meeting or convention unless the posposted motion is brought back before the assembly by a motion to resume consideration or to take from the table." Again, not ambigious, it is a very specifici motion. The other one requires specific date, which the current assembly can not act upon until that specific date. David On 4/24/2010 1:26 PM, Tina S. Vickery wrote: > David, do you have a defintion of temporarily, prior to this being seconded. > Temporarily is pretty ambiguous. > > Tina > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "W David Samuelsen"<[email protected]> > To:<[email protected]>; "Linda Lewis"<[email protected]>; > <[email protected]>; "Larry Flesher"<[email protected]>; "Les Shockley" > <[email protected]>; "Jeff Kemp"<[email protected]>; "Denise > Wells"<[email protected]>; "Colleen Pustola"<[email protected]>; > <[email protected]>; "Dale Grimm"<[email protected]>; "DC& Alice Allen" > <[email protected]>; "Pauli Smith"<[email protected]>; "Cyndie > Enfinger"<[email protected]>; "Tina Vickery"<[email protected]>; > "Sherri"<[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:01 PM > Subject: Re-laying the Motion to lay the table 2009/10-23 > > >> At request of the NC: >> >> I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. >> >> The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. >> >> Sturgis page 68-69. >> >> W. David Samuelsen

For goodness sake, David, why does everything have to be such a fiasco? Can't you just ask a darn question instead of deciding everything is a conspiracy? Denise Wells On Apr 24, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Sherri <[email protected]> wrote: > David, > > If you check the archives, the AB went into executive session to > deal with > the resolution of a grievance. That issue has not been completed at > this > point, so yes, the executive session continues and is not being used > as a > "blanket" (although I'm not sure what you're trying to convey with > this > word). > > The announcement of going into executive session has been done like > this in > the past with no objections, so it does follow past precedent. If > the rest > of you want me to change the way that executive sessions are > handled, by all > means, please let me know and I will be glad to do so. > > The opening of the NWPL SC representative position on the AB > occurred after > that session began, and we are required name a replacement within a > certain > time period per the bylaws. Since we're 7 days away from the end of > that > time frame, this is something that must be dealt with and putting it > in line > behind two or three other things is not going to work and still > allow us to > meet the time frame. > > > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: W David Samuelsen [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:11 PM > To: [email protected]; Sherri; Tina Vickery; Cyndie Enfinger; Dale > Grimm; > DC & Alice Allen; Pauli Smith; Colleen Pustola; [email protected]; > Les > Shockley; Jeff Kemp; Denise Wells; Larry Flesher; > [email protected]; Linda > Lewis > Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" > > Point of Order > > Sturgis page 108-109 > Motion must be made and seconded, is priviledged, not debatable or > amendable, adopted by majority vote to go into closed session. Each > time > there is a issue. It can not be used as a blanket. > > David Samuelsen > > On 4/24/2010 7:14 AM, Sherri wrote: >> It seems that things just keep rolling in one after the other. > >> For the record, the Advisory Board is continuing in executive >> session, the >> new issue that we're dealing with is the appointment of a NWPL SC >> representative. > >> Sherri Bradley >> National Coordinator >> USGenWeb Project >> Information about the USGenWeb Project at<http://usgenweb.org> >> http://usgenweb.org >> Advisory Board Agenda<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> >> http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] > with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and > the body of the message

Sherri, you might as well go ahead and declare the Board list(s) moderated. It is apparent that it can not be used for day to day business of the Project. Just set the agenda and then call on each of us in turn , first assuring we are present (2 days), then setting an order that we all speak (2 days), then giving time for each of us time to speak (13 days), then giving time for questions and answers (169 days). Then allowing the issue to come to a vote (2 days), then we have the discussion period (169 days) and then viola -- we have a motion passed -- of course the newly seated ab will have to deal with it, as our term is up. 357 days will have passed, just enough time for us all to use the 6 days left to wish each other the best in our future endeavors. What a plan! Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: "W David Samuelsen" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]>; "Sherri" <[email protected]>; "Tina Vickery" <[email protected]>; "Cyndie Enfinger" <[email protected]>; "Dale Grimm" <[email protected]>; "DC & Alice Allen" <[email protected]>; "Pauli Smith" <[email protected]>; "Colleen Pustola" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Les Shockley" <[email protected]>; "Jeff Kemp" <[email protected]>; "Denise Wells" <[email protected]>; "Larry Flesher" <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>; "Linda Lewis" <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:11 PM Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" > Point of Order > > Sturgis page 108-109 > Motion must be made and seconded, is priviledged, not debatable or > amendable, adopted by majority vote to go into closed session. Each time > there is a issue. It can not be used as a blanket. > > David Samuelsen > > On 4/24/2010 7:14 AM, Sherri wrote: >> It seems that things just keep rolling in one after the other. > >> For the record, the Advisory Board is continuing in executive session, >> the >> new issue that we're dealing with is the appointment of a NWPL SC >> representative. > >> Sherri Bradley >> National Coordinator >> USGenWeb Project >> Information about the USGenWeb Project at<http://usgenweb.org> >> http://usgenweb.org >> Advisory Board Agenda<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> >> http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php

David, If you check the archives, the AB went into executive session to deal with the resolution of a grievance. That issue has not been completed at this point, so yes, the executive session continues and is not being used as a "blanket" (although I'm not sure what you're trying to convey with this word). The announcement of going into executive session has been done like this in the past with no objections, so it does follow past precedent. If the rest of you want me to change the way that executive sessions are handled, by all means, please let me know and I will be glad to do so. The opening of the NWPL SC representative position on the AB occurred after that session began, and we are required name a replacement within a certain time period per the bylaws. Since we're 7 days away from the end of that time frame, this is something that must be dealt with and putting it in line behind two or three other things is not going to work and still allow us to meet the time frame. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php -----Original Message----- From: W David Samuelsen [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:11 PM To: [email protected]; Sherri; Tina Vickery; Cyndie Enfinger; Dale Grimm; DC & Alice Allen; Pauli Smith; Colleen Pustola; [email protected]; Les Shockley; Jeff Kemp; Denise Wells; Larry Flesher; [email protected]; Linda Lewis Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" Point of Order Sturgis page 108-109 Motion must be made and seconded, is priviledged, not debatable or amendable, adopted by majority vote to go into closed session. Each time there is a issue. It can not be used as a blanket. David Samuelsen On 4/24/2010 7:14 AM, Sherri wrote: > It seems that things just keep rolling in one after the other. > For the record, the Advisory Board is continuing in executive session, the > new issue that we're dealing with is the appointment of a NWPL SC > representative. > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at<http://usgenweb.org> > http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> > http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php

How interesting..... Where did I say anything about resign or be removed in this point of order? Much less where is the tabling motion which was sent to the board at your request which was very plain and simple? David Samuelsen On 4/24/2010 12:33 PM, Sherri wrote: > That may well be, David, but why bring it up in such an antagonistic way now > because everyone's not agreeing with your point of view? As pointed out > before, it appears that you're doing nothing except to try to force your own > agenda onto this AB, including trying to force certain members to either > resign or to be removed. > > Sherri > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of W David Samuelsen > Sent: Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:17 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [BOARD] Executive Session "Point of Order" > > I'm following what the Sturgis says when it comes to the motions. > > David > > On 4/24/2010 11:51 AM, Denise Wells wrote: >> For goodness sake, David, why does everything have to be such a >> fiasco? Can't you just ask a darn question instead of deciding >> everything is a conspiracy? >> >> Denise Wells > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in > the subject and the body of the message > > > USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > >

I'm following what the Sturgis says when it comes to the motions. David On 4/24/2010 11:51 AM, Denise Wells wrote: > For goodness sake, David, why does everything have to be such a > fiasco? Can't you just ask a darn question instead of deciding > everything is a conspiracy? > > Denise Wells

Thank you Sherri! That is so generous of you. Pauli Smith NENC CC Rep ---- Original Message ---- From: Sherri <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Sent: Sat, April 24, 2010 8:07:59 AM Subject: Re: [BOARD] Volunteer Projects Help Family Historians For the record, the stipend that I was paid to write this article will be applied to the cost of the domain registrations and hosting for the USGenWeb Project. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project -----Original Message----- From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tina S. Vickery Sent: Friday, April 23, 2010 10:58 PM To: Archives Discussion List; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; usgenweb-discuss; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Subject: [BOARD] Volunteer Projects Help Family Historians USGenWeb Project featured! http://experts.archives.com/<http://experts.archives.com/> Congratulations to our National Coordinator, Sherri Bradley! You have done the USGenWeb Project proud! Tina Vickery USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml> ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml> ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message USGenWeb Advisory Board Agenda: http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.shtml> ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Point of Order Sturgis page 108-109 Motion must be made and seconded, is priviledged, not debatable or amendable, adopted by majority vote to go into closed session. Each time there is a issue. It can not be used as a blanket. David Samuelsen On 4/24/2010 7:14 AM, Sherri wrote: > It seems that things just keep rolling in one after the other. > For the record, the Advisory Board is continuing in executive session, the > new issue that we're dealing with is the appointment of a NWPL SC > representative. > Sherri Bradley > National Coordinator > USGenWeb Project > Information about the USGenWeb Project at<http://usgenweb.org> > http://usgenweb.org > Advisory Board Agenda<http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> > http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php

I second the motion. Colleen Pustola NWPL CC Rep On 4/24/2010 5:54 AM, W David Samuelsen wrote: > I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. > > The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. > > Sturgis page 68-69. > > W. David Samuelsen >

At request of the NC: I move to table the motion "2009/10-23" temporarily. The reason: Insufficient time to resolve more concerns. Sturgis page 68-69. W. David Samuelsen

It seems that things just keep rolling in one after the other. For the record, the Advisory Board is continuing in executive session, the new issue that we're dealing with is the appointment of a NWPL SC representative. Sherri Bradley National Coordinator USGenWeb Project Information about the USGenWeb Project at <http://usgenweb.org> http://usgenweb.org Advisory Board Agenda <http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php> http://usgenweb.org/agenda2.php