In a message dated 8/28/2000 2:37:42 PM Eastern Daylight Time, BeejC1@aol.com writes: << I'm sorry. I didn't make myself clear. The point I was making was that Sarah, wife of Isham, was not necessarily a Wilkinson as there were two Sarah Blankenships in the same area at the same time and as far as I have been able to determine there is no clear evidence of her maiden name. A Joseph also had a wife Sarah. Sarah and Edith Wilkinson had a brother, Stephen. Joseph and his wife, Sarah, named a son Stephen. That is not a Blankenship name and it is possible they named him after her brother. And the fact that Zachariah and Edith would have been double first cousins if both of their mothers were Wilkinsons made me question it also. >> Hi Betty, THANK YOU, That is so sweet of you to clear that up for me. Now I know that Sarah is just Sarah and may not have been a Wilkinson. I will update my family tree as soon as I close this e-mail to you. Thanks a ton, Sue