In a message dated 1/22/2003 7:49:31 AM Central Standard Time, griffith@freenet.tlh.fl.us writes: > I think we have pretty much decided that Nancy was the d/o Travis Stowers, > there is an unidentified girl in the 1820 census. > Sandra - you are referring to Nancy FRENCH possibly being a STOWERS instead? This is first time I have seen this - do you have any discussions on this theory you could share other than the unidentified girl on the 1820 cencus and why would it be assumed this was "our" Nancy??? Kay

this is from Mike, I have this at home so you need to use aol if you want me to check my files. Thanks for writing, Sandy in Florida **REPLY TO SandraG627@aol.com** On Wed, 22 Jan 2003 BKAYMEL@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 1/22/2003 7:49:31 AM Central Standard Time, > griffith@freenet.tlh.fl.us writes: > > > I think we have pretty much decided that Nancy was the d/o Travis Stowers, > > there is an unidentified girl in the 1820 census. > > > > Sandra - you are referring to Nancy FRENCH possibly being a STOWERS instead? > This is first time I have seen this - do you have any discussions on this > theory you could share other than the unidentified girl on the 1820 cencus > and why would it be assumed this was "our" Nancy??? > > Kay > > > ==== BLANKENSHIP Mailing List ==== > Please remember to post your family information putting the SURNAME in all caps and using dates and places. The more information you provide, the easier it is for someone to make a connection. >